Lundwall Kristina, Kahan Thomas, Omboni Stefano
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Clinical Research Unit, Italian Institute of Telemedicine, Varese, Italy.
Hypertens Res. 2024 Feb;47(2):435-444. doi: 10.1038/s41440-023-01473-x. Epub 2023 Oct 23.
The coexistence of hypertension and atrial fibrillation (AF) is common and accounts for a worse prognosis. Uncertainties exist regarding blood pressure (BP) measurements in AF patients by automated oscillometric devices. The Microlife WatchBP 03 AFIB ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) device including an AF algorithm with each measurement was used in 430 subjects aged >65 years referred for ABPM and with assumed paroxysmal AF to perform intra-individual comparisons of BP during both AF-indicated and sinus rhythm. Only subjects with >30% of measurements indicating AF and episodes >30 min for assumed AF and for sinus rhythm were included. Mean age was 78 ± 7 years, 43% were male, 77% hypertensive, and 72% were treated. Compared to sinus rhythm, 24-h mean arterial pressure was similar (87.2 ± 9.5 vs 87.5 ± 10.6 mm Hg, p = 0.47), whereas 24-h systolic BP tended to be lower (123.6 ± 13.9 vs 124.7 ± 16.1 mm Hg, p = 0.05) and night-time diastolic BP higher (64.6 ± 10.9 vs 63.3 ± 10.4 mm Hg, p = 0.01) in assumed AF. Diastolic (not systolic) BP variability was higher in AF (p < 0.001). Results were similar with heart rates <90 and ≥90 bpm. In conclusion, this is the first study to use intra-individual comparisons of averaged BP during an ABPM in assumed paroxysmal AF and sinus rhythm. Our results imply that ABPM is feasible and informative also in patients with AF. We also suggest that an AF detection algorithm offers a new approach to evaluate the reliability of averaged BP values in AF compared to SR during an ABPM.
高血压与心房颤动(AF)并存很常见,且预示着更差的预后。通过自动示波装置测量房颤患者血压(BP)存在不确定性。430名年龄大于65岁、因行动态血压监测(ABPM)而被转诊且假定为阵发性房颤的受试者使用了Microlife WatchBP 03 AFIB动态血压监测设备,该设备每次测量均包含房颤算法,以对房颤发作期和窦性心律期间的血压进行个体内比较。仅纳入测量结果显示房颤占比超过30%且假定房颤和窦性心律发作时间超过30分钟的受试者。平均年龄为78±7岁,43%为男性,77%患有高血压,72%接受了治疗。与窦性心律相比,24小时平均动脉压相似(87.2±9.5 vs 87.5±10.6 mmHg,p = 0.47),而假定房颤时24小时收缩压趋于更低(123.6±13.9 vs 124.7±16.1 mmHg,p = 0.05),夜间舒张压更高(64.6±10.9 vs 63.3±10.4 mmHg,p = 0.01)。房颤时舒张压(而非收缩压)变异性更高(p < 0.001)。心率<90次/分和≥90次/分时结果相似。总之,这是第一项在假定阵发性房颤和窦性心律期间使用动态血压监测中平均血压个体内比较的研究。我们的结果表明,动态血压监测在房颤患者中也是可行且信息丰富的。我们还建议,房颤检测算法为评估动态血压监测期间房颤与窦性心律相比平均血压值的可靠性提供了一种新方法。