• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对全科医生识别儿童急性阑尾炎重要的因素:德尔菲研究。

What is important to the GP in recognizing acute appendicitis in children: a delphi study.

机构信息

Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, PO Box 196, Groningen, 9700 AD, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Prim Care. 2023 Oct 23;24(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02167-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12875-023-02167-6
PMID:37872491
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10591392/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

For diagnostic research on appendicitis in registration data, insight is needed in the way GPs generate medical records. We aimed to reach a consensus on the features that GPs consider important in the consultation and medical records when evaluating a child with suspected appendicitis.

METHODS

We performed a three-round Delphi study among Dutch GPs selected by purposive sampling. An initial feature list was created based on a literature search and features in the relevant Dutch guideline. Finally, using a vignette describing a child who needed later reassessment, we asked participants to complete an online questionnaire about which consultation features should be addressed and recorded.

RESULTS

A literature review and Dutch guideline yielded 95 consultation features. All three rounds were completed by 22 GPs, with the final consensus list containing 26 symptoms, 29 physical assessments and signs, 2 additional tests, and 8 further actions (including safety-netting, i.e., informing the patient about when to contact the GP again). Of these, participants reached consensus that 37 should be actively addressed and that 20 need to be recorded if findings are negative.

CONCLUSIONS

GPs agreed that negative findings do not need to be recorded for most features and that records should include the prognostic and safety-netting advice given. The results have implications in three main domains: for research, that negative findings are likely to be missing; for medicolegal purposes, that documentation cannot be expected to be complete; and for clinical practice, that safety-netting advice should be given and documented.

摘要

背景

在注册数据中进行阑尾炎诊断研究时,需要深入了解全科医生生成医疗记录的方式。我们旨在就全科医生在评估疑似阑尾炎的儿童时,在咨询和医疗记录中认为重要的特征达成共识。

方法

我们在荷兰通过目的性抽样选择的全科医生中进行了三轮 Delphi 研究。最初的特征列表是根据文献检索和相关荷兰指南中的特征创建的。最后,使用描述需要进一步评估的儿童的案例,我们要求参与者在线填写一份问卷,内容是哪些咨询特征应被提及和记录。

结果

文献综述和荷兰指南共产生了 95 个咨询特征。所有三轮都由 22 名全科医生完成,最终的共识列表包含 26 个症状、29 个身体评估和体征、2 项额外检查和 8 项进一步行动(包括安全网,即告知患者何时再次联系全科医生)。其中,参与者达成共识,认为 37 项应积极处理,如果发现为阴性,则 20 项需要记录。

结论

全科医生一致认为,大多数特征的阴性发现无需记录,并且记录应包括提供的预后和安全网建议。研究结果对三个主要领域具有重要意义:对于研究而言,阴性发现可能会缺失;对于医疗法律目的而言,预计无法完成完整的记录;对于临床实践而言,应提供并记录安全网建议。

相似文献

1
What is important to the GP in recognizing acute appendicitis in children: a delphi study.对全科医生识别儿童急性阑尾炎重要的因素:德尔菲研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Oct 23;24(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02167-6.
2
Appendicitis in children with acute abdominal pain in primary care, a retrospective cohort study.基层医疗中急性腹痛儿童的阑尾炎:一项回顾性队列研究
Fam Pract. 2021 Nov 24;38(6):758-765. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmab039.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Point-of-care ultrasound for general practitioners: a systematic needs assessment.全科医生床旁超声:系统需求评估。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2020 Mar;38(1):3-11. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2020.1711572. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
5
Improving primary palliative care - a Delphi consensus study on measures for general practice in Germany.提高初级姑息治疗水平 - 德国全科医学的德尔菲共识研究:措施。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Jan 17;23(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01613-7.
6
Factors affecting the documentation of spoken safety-netting advice in routine GP consultations: a cross-sectional study.影响常规全科医生咨询中记录口头安全网建议的因素:一项横断面研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2021 Oct 28;71(712):e869-e876. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0195. Print 2021 Nov.
7
Core outcome set for uncomplicated acute appendicitis in children and young people.儿童和青少年单纯性急性阑尾炎的核心结局集。
Br J Surg. 2020 Jul;107(8):1013-1022. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11508. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
8
[Correspondence between general practitioners and cardiologists: Consensus from a study Delphi].[全科医生与心脏病专家之间的通信:德尔菲研究的共识]
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 2018 Sep;67(4):231-237. doi: 10.1016/j.ancard.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
9
How do general practitioners use 'safety netting' in acutely ill children?全科医生如何在急症患儿中运用“安全网”措施?
Eur J Gen Pract. 2016;22(1):3-8. doi: 10.3109/13814788.2015.1092516. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
10
Developing a model osteoarthritis consultation: a Delphi consensus exercise.开发一种模型骨关节炎咨询:德尔菲共识研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Jan 16;14:25. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-25.

本文引用的文献

1
Data Resource Profile: The Integrated Primary Care Information (IPCI) database, The Netherlands.数据资源简介:荷兰综合初级保健信息(IPCI)数据库
Int J Epidemiol. 2022 Dec 13;51(6):e314-e323. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyac026.
2
Factors affecting the documentation of spoken safety-netting advice in routine GP consultations: a cross-sectional study.影响常规全科医生咨询中记录口头安全网建议的因素:一项横断面研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2021 Oct 28;71(712):e869-e876. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0195. Print 2021 Nov.
3
Appendicitis in children with acute abdominal pain in primary care, a retrospective cohort study.基层医疗中急性腹痛儿童的阑尾炎:一项回顾性队列研究
Fam Pract. 2021 Nov 24;38(6):758-765. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmab039.
4
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts acute appendicitis and distinguishes between complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值预测急性阑尾炎,并区分复杂型与单纯型阑尾炎:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Am J Surg. 2020 Jan;219(1):154-163. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.04.018. Epub 2019 Apr 27.
5
Correspondence between primary and secondary care about patients with cancer: a Delphi consensus study.初级保健和二级保健之间关于癌症患者的沟通:德尔菲共识研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2019 Nov;27(11):4199-4205. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04712-5. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
6
Safety netting for primary care: evidence from a literature review.初级保健的安全网:文献综述证据。
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Jan;69(678):e70-e79. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X700193. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
7
Safety netting: now doctors need it too.安全保障:现在医生也需要它。
Br J Gen Pract. 2018 May;68(670):214-215. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X695849.
8
Characteristics of revisits of children at risk for serious infections in pediatric emergency care.儿科急诊中高危严重感染儿童复诊的特征。
Eur J Pediatr. 2018 Apr;177(4):617-624. doi: 10.1007/s00431-018-3095-0. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
9
Diagnostic Accuracy of History, Physical Examination, Laboratory Tests, and Point-of-care Ultrasound for Pediatric Acute Appendicitis in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.急诊科小儿急性阑尾炎病史、体格检查、实验室检查及床旁超声的诊断准确性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Acad Emerg Med. 2017 May;24(5):523-551. doi: 10.1111/acem.13181.
10
Pediatric appendicitis: state of the art review.小儿阑尾炎:最新综述
Pediatr Surg Int. 2017 Mar;33(3):269-283. doi: 10.1007/s00383-016-3990-2. Epub 2016 Oct 14.