Safety netting: now doctors need it too.
作者信息
Neighbour Roger
机构信息
Royal College of General Practitioners.
出版信息
Br J Gen Pract. 2018 May;68(670):214-215. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X695849.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Safety netting: now doctors need it too.安全保障：现在医生也需要它。
Br J Gen Pract. 2018 May;68(670):214-215. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X695849.
2
How do general practitioners use 'safety netting' in acutely ill children?全科医生如何在急症患儿中运用“安全网”措施？
Eur J Gen Pract. 2016;22(1):3-8. doi: 10.3109/13814788.2015.1092516. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
3
The consulting room fog.诊疗室迷雾。
Br J Gen Pract. 2013 Jan;63(606):38-9. doi: 10.3399/bjgp13X660869.
4
Safeguarding adults in primary care: making a safeguarding adults referral.在初级医疗保健中保护成年人：进行成人保护转介。
Br J Gen Pract. 2016 Jun;66(647):e454-6. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X685525.
5
Why do physicians vary so widely in their referral rates?为什么医生的转诊率差异如此之大？
J Gen Intern Med. 2000 Mar;15(3):163-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.04079.x.
6
Are general practitioners getting the information they need from hospitals and specialists to provide quality cancer care for Indigenous Australians?全科医生是否能从医院和专科医生那里获得所需的信息，为澳大利亚原住民提供高质量的癌症护理？
Intern Med J. 2020 Jan;50(1):38-47. doi: 10.1111/imj.14356.
7
Referral patterns of children with poor growth in primary health care.基层医疗保健中生长发育不良儿童的转诊模式。
BMC Public Health. 2007 May 11;7:77. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-77.
8
Palliative care consultations in primary care: a cross-sectional survey among Dutch general practitioners.初级保健中的姑息治疗咨询：荷兰全科医生的横断面调查。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2019 Dec;9(4):e30. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2015-000967. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
9
Old boys' network in general practitioners' referral behavior?全科医生转诊行为中的校友关系网？
J Health Econ. 2015 Sep;43:56-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2015.06.005. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
10
A closer look at the social prescribing phenomenon.深入剖析社会处方现象。
Br J Community Nurs. 2018 Dec 2;23(12):620-621. doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2018.23.12.620.
引用本文的文献
1
Role of communicating diagnostic uncertainty in the safety-netting process: insights from a vignette study.沟通诊断不确定性在安全网过程中的作用：来自情景研究的见解。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2024 Nov 20;33(12):769-779. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2023-017037.
2
What is important to the GP in recognizing acute appendicitis in children: a delphi study.对全科医生识别儿童急性阑尾炎重要的因素：德尔菲研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Oct 23;24(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02167-6.
3
Are rare diseases overlooked by medical education? Awareness of rare diseases among physicians in Poland: an explanatory study.罕见病是否被医学教育所忽视？波兰医生对罕见病的认知：一项解释性研究。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021 Sep 28;16(1):400. doi: 10.1186/s13023-021-02023-9.
4
Identifying safe care processes when GPs work in or alongside emergency departments: a realist evaluation.当全科医生在急诊部门或与之合作时，确定安全的护理流程：一个实际评估。
Br J Gen Pract. 2021 Nov 25;71(713):e931-e940. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0090. Print 2021 Dec.
5
How do GPs and patients share the responsibility for cancer safety netting follow-up actions? A qualitative interview study of GPs and patients in Oxfordshire, UK.全科医生和患者如何分担癌症安全网后续行动的责任？对英国牛津郡的全科医生和患者进行的定性访谈研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 12;9(9):e029316. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029316.
6
Skill-mix change in general practice: a qualitative comparison of three 'new' non-medical roles in English primary care.全科医生技能组合的变化：英国初级保健中三种“新”非医疗角色的定性比较。
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Jul;69(684):e489-e498. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X704117. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
7
The stable rower: identifying a rare disease.稳定的划桨手：识别一种罕见疾病。
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Feb;69(679):86. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X701117.
本文引用的文献
1
Acceptability of text messages for safety netting patients with low-risk cancer symptoms: a qualitative study.低危癌症症状患者安全网短信可接受性的定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2018 May;68(670):e333-e341. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X695741. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
2
Books: The Appointment: What Your Doctor Really Thinks During Your Ten-Minute Consultation: The Most Important Job.书籍：《预约：十分钟会诊期间医生的真实想法：最重要的工作》
Br J Gen Pract. 2016 Nov;66(652):577. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X687853.
3
How do general practitioners use 'safety netting' in acutely ill children?全科医生如何在急症患儿中运用“安全网”措施？
Eur J Gen Pract. 2016;22(1):3-8. doi: 10.3109/13814788.2015.1092516. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
Zotero 插件