Norby I I, Max M H
South Med J. 1986 Dec;79(12):1503-5. doi: 10.1097/00007611-198612000-00008.
Splenorrhaphy has become increasingly used for management of the traumatized spleen. This approach has been advocated to obviate the potential for fulminant postsplenectomy sepsis. We reviewed the records of 42 patients with penetrating or blunt trauma treated by splenectomy or splenorrhaphy at Norfolk General Hospital between 1979 and 1983. Twenty-six had splenectomy and 16 had splenorrhaphy. We evaluated age, sex, mechanism of injury, associated injuries, operative technique of splenorrhaphy, perioperative fluid requirements, and intraoperative and postoperative complications. Patients who had splenectomy had more associated injuries and more intraoperative hypotension, required more fluid replacement, and had more postoperative complications. Patients who had splenectomy were in a more unstable condition than those having splenorrhaphy; 22 of the 26 had an unsalvageable spleen. There were no complications related to splenorrhaphy. In stable patients with a potentially salvageable injured spleen, an attempt should be made to repair it before resorting to splenectomy. No added risk appears to accrue from this approach.
脾修补术在创伤性脾损伤的治疗中应用越来越广泛。这种方法被提倡以避免脾切除术后暴发性败血症的潜在风险。我们回顾了1979年至1983年间在诺福克总医院接受脾切除术或脾修补术治疗的42例穿透性或钝性创伤患者的记录。26例行脾切除术,16例行脾修补术。我们评估了年龄、性别、损伤机制、合并伤、脾修补术的手术技术、围手术期液体需求量以及术中及术后并发症。行脾切除术的患者合并伤更多,术中低血压更多,需要更多的液体补充,术后并发症也更多。行脾切除术的患者比行脾修补术的患者病情更不稳定;26例中有22例脾脏无法挽救。脾修补术无相关并发症。对于脾脏损伤且病情稳定、有可能挽救的患者,在进行脾切除术之前应尝试进行修补。这种方法似乎不会增加额外风险。