Feliciano D V, Spjut-Patrinely V, Burch J M, Mattox K L, Bitondo C G, Cruse-Martocci P, Jordan G L
Cora and Webb Mading Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Ann Surg. 1990 May;211(5):569-80; discussion 580-2. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199005000-00007.
From 1980 to 1989, 240 adult patients underwent splenorrhaphy at one urban trauma center. This represents 43.4% of all splenic injuries seen during this time interval. Splenic injuries were graded I to V, and splenorrhaphy was attempted except when the spleen was shattered or when multiple injuries with associated hypotension were present. Penetrating wounds, blunt trauma, or iatrogenic/unknown etiologies were present in 54.2%, 41.6%, and 4.2% of patients, respectively. Grade I or II injuries were present in 51.7% of patients, grade III in 34.6%, grade IV or V in 9.6%, and unknown grade in 4.1%. The technique of splenorrhaphy was simple suture (usually chromic) with or without the addition of topical hemostatic agents in 200 patients (83.3%), topical agents alone in 12 (5%), unknown type of repair in 12 (5%), compression, cautery, or nonbleeding injury in 9 (3.8%), and partial or hemisplenectomy in 7 (2.9%). Postoperative rebleeding occurred in three patients (1.3%) with grade II, III, and IV injuries, respectively, and led to splenectomy at reoperation. In another patient who had a hemisplenectomy performed for a grade IV injury, subphrenic abscesses and septic shock led to the death of the patient. Splenorrhaphy can be safely performed in properly selected adult patients after a variety of injuries. The risk of rebleeding is practically nil when the spleen is fully mobilized and visualized during repair.
1980年至1989年期间,一家城市创伤中心对240例成年患者实施了脾修补术。这占该时间段内所见所有脾损伤病例的43.4%。脾损伤分为I至V级,除脾脏破碎或存在伴有低血压的多发伤外,均尝试进行脾修补术。穿透伤、钝性创伤或医源性/病因不明分别占患者的54.2%、41.6%和4.2%。I级或II级损伤的患者占51.7%,III级占34.6%,IV级或V级占9.6%,损伤分级不明的占4.1%。200例患者(83.3%)采用单纯缝合(通常为铬制缝线),加或不加局部止血剂进行脾修补术;12例(5%)仅使用局部止血剂;12例(5%)修补方式不明;9例(3.8%)采用压迫、烧灼或处理无出血的损伤;7例(2.9%)行部分脾切除术或半脾切除术。术后再出血分别发生在3例II级、III级和IV级损伤的患者中(1.3%),再次手术时行脾切除术。另1例因IV级损伤行半脾切除术的患者,膈下脓肿和感染性休克导致患者死亡。对于经过适当选择的成年患者,在遭受各种损伤后可安全地实施脾修补术。在修补过程中,如果脾脏充分游离并能直视,再出血的风险几乎为零。