Goliskina Viktorija, Ceple Ilze, Kassaliete Evita, Serpa Evita, Truksa Renars, Svede Aiga, Krauze Linda, Fomins Sergejs, Ikaunieks Gatis, Krumina Gunta
Department of Optometry and Vision Science, Faculty of Physics, Mathematics and Optometry, University of Latvia, LV-1586 Riga, Latvia.
Institute of Solid State Physics, University of Latvia, LV-1063 Riga, Latvia.
Vision (Basel). 2023 Oct 23;7(4):68. doi: 10.3390/vision7040068.
(1) Background: Saccadic eye movements are rapid eye movements aimed to position the object image on the central retina, ensuring high-resolution data sampling across the visual field. Although saccadic eye movements are studied extensively, different experimental settings applied across different studies have left an open question of whether and how stimulus parameters can affect the saccadic performance. The current study aims to explore the effect of stimulus contrast and spatial position on saccadic eye movement latency, peak velocity and accuracy measurements. (2) Methods: Saccadic eye movement targets of different contrast levels were presented at four different spatial positions. The eye movements were recorded with a Tobii Pro Fusion video-oculograph (250 Hz). (3) Results: The results demonstrate a significant effect of stimulus spatial position on the latency and peak velocity measurements at a medium grey background, 30 cd/m (negative and positive stimulus polarity), light grey background, 90 cd/m (negative polarity), and black background, 3 cd/m (positive polarity). A significant effect of the stimulus spatial position was observed on the accuracy measurements when the saccadic eye movement stimuli were presented on a medium grey background (negative polarity) and on a black background. No significant effect of stimulus contrast was observed on the peak velocity measurements under all conditions. A significant stimulus contrast effect on latency and accuracy was observed only on a light grey background. (4) Conclusions: The best saccadic eye movement performance (lowest latency, highest peak velocity and accuracy measurements) can be observed when the saccades are oriented to the right and left from the central fixation point. Furthermore, when presenting the stimulus on a light grey background, a very low contrast stimuli should be considered carefully.
(1) 背景:扫视眼动是一种快速眼动,旨在将物体图像定位在中央视网膜上,以确保在整个视野范围内进行高分辨率的数据采样。尽管对扫视眼动进行了广泛研究,但不同研究中采用的不同实验设置留下了一个悬而未决的问题,即刺激参数是否以及如何影响扫视性能。本研究旨在探讨刺激对比度和空间位置对扫视眼动潜伏期、峰值速度和准确性测量的影响。(2) 方法:在四个不同空间位置呈现不同对比度水平的扫视眼动目标。使用Tobii Pro Fusion视频眼动仪(250 Hz)记录眼动。(3) 结果:结果表明,在中等灰色背景(30 cd/m²,正负刺激极性)、浅灰色背景(90 cd/m²,负极性)和黑色背景(3 cd/m²,正极性)下,刺激空间位置对潜伏期和峰值速度测量有显著影响。当扫视眼动刺激呈现在中等灰色背景(负极性)和黑色背景上时,观察到刺激空间位置对准确性测量有显著影响。在所有条件下,均未观察到刺激对比度对峰值速度测量有显著影响。仅在浅灰色背景上观察到刺激对比度对潜伏期和准确性有显著影响。(4) 结论:当扫视从中央注视点向右和向左定向时,可以观察到最佳的扫视眼动性能(最低潜伏期、最高峰值速度和准确性测量)。此外,当在浅灰色背景上呈现刺激时,应谨慎考虑对比度非常低的刺激。