• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

纽约心脏协会心功能分级和堪萨斯城心肌病问卷在急性心力衰竭中的应用。

New York Heart Association Class and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire in Acute Heart Failure.

机构信息

National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Oct 2;6(10):e2339458. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.39458.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.39458
PMID:37874564
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10599126/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Sparse data exist regarding how clinician-assigned New York Heart Association (NYHA) class compares with heart failure (HF)-specific Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) in acute HF.

OBJECTIVE

To compare concordance between NYHA class and KCCQ overall summary score (KCCQ-OS) in acute HF and investigate associations of changes in NYHA class and KCCQ-OS with long-term outcomes.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this cohort study, patients with HF were enrolled from 52 hospitals in China between August 2016 and May 2018. Among patients with NYHA class and KCCQ-OS at admission and 1 month, levels of each scale were categorized into 4 groups from worst to best. Mild and moderate to severe discordance were defined as NYHA class and KCCQ-OS differing by 1 level or 2 or more levels, respectively. Multivariable models evaluated associations between improvements in the 2 measures and outcomes. Analysis was conducted from January to March 2023.

EXPOSURE

Changes in NYHA class and KCCQ-OS from admission to 1 month.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

All-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, or first HF rehospitalization.

RESULTS

A total of 2683 patients (1709 [63.7%] male; median [IQR] age, 66 [56-75] years) were included. NYHA class II, III, and IV were presented in 374 patients (13.9%), 1179 patients (44.0%), and 1130 patients (42.1%), respectively, and the median (IQR) KCCQ-OS was 44.4 (28.3-61.9). Concordance, mild discordance, and moderate to severe discordance between admission NYHA class and KCCQ-OS occurred in 954 patients (35.6%), 1203 patients (44.8%), and 526 patients (19.6%), respectively. For KCCQ-OS, kernel density overlaps were 73.6% between NYHA II and III, 63.8% between NYHA II and IV, and 88.3% between NYHA III and IV. Most patients experienced improvements in NYHA and KCCQ-OS from admission to 1 month. After adjustment, there was no significant association between improvements in NYHA class and 4-year all-cause mortality, whereas 5 or more point improvements in KCCQ-OS were independently associated with a lower risk of 4-year mortality (hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.74-0.96; P = .01). NYHA class and KCCQ-OS improvements were both associated with decreased risk of 1-year composite cardiovascular death or HF rehospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort study of acute HF, discordance between NYHA class and KCCQ was common, and KCCQ was more relevant to subsequent mortality than NYHA class.

摘要

重要性

关于临床医生分配的纽约心脏协会(NYHA)心功能分级与急性心力衰竭(HF)特异性堪萨斯城心肌病问卷(KCCQ)在急性 HF 中的比较,相关数据稀疏。

目的

比较急性 HF 中 NYHA 心功能分级与 KCCQ 总概括评分(KCCQ-OS)的一致性,并探讨 NYHA 心功能分级和 KCCQ-OS 变化与长期结局的关系。

设计、设置和参与者:在这项队列研究中,从 2016 年 8 月至 2018 年 5 月,在中国的 52 家医院招募了 HF 患者。在有 NYHA 心功能分级和入院及 1 个月时的 KCCQ-OS 的患者中,将各量表的水平分为从最差到最好的 4 组。轻度和中重度至重度不匹配分别定义为 NYHA 心功能分级和 KCCQ-OS 相差 1 级或 2 级或更多级。多变量模型评估了这两个指标的改善与结局之间的关系。分析于 2023 年 1 月至 3 月进行。

暴露

从入院到 1 个月时 NYHA 心功能分级和 KCCQ-OS 的变化。

主要结局和测量指标

全因死亡率、心血管死亡或首次 HF 再住院。

结果

共纳入 2683 例患者(1709 例[63.7%]为男性;中位[IQR]年龄,66[56-75]岁)。374 例(13.9%)、1179 例(44.0%)和 1130 例(42.1%)患者分别表现为 NYHA 心功能 II 级、III 级和 IV 级,中位(IQR)KCCQ-OS 为 44.4(28.3-61.9)。入院时 NYHA 心功能分级与 KCCQ-OS 之间存在一致性、轻度不匹配和中重度不匹配的患者分别为 954 例(35.6%)、1203 例(44.8%)和 526 例(19.6%)。对于 KCCQ-OS,NYHA II 与 III 之间的核密度重叠度为 73.6%,NYHA II 与 IV 之间为 63.8%,NYHA III 与 IV 之间为 88.3%。大多数患者从入院到 1 个月时 NYHA 和 KCCQ-OS 均有改善。调整后,NYHA 心功能分级的改善与 4 年全因死亡率之间无显著相关性,而 KCCQ-OS 改善 5 分或以上与 4 年死亡率降低独立相关(危险比,0.84;95%CI,0.74-0.96;P=0.01)。NYHA 心功能分级和 KCCQ-OS 的改善均与 1 年复合心血管死亡或 HF 再住院风险降低相关。

结论和相关性

在这项急性 HF 的队列研究中,NYHA 心功能分级与 KCCQ 之间存在明显不匹配,与 NYHA 心功能分级相比,KCCQ 与后续死亡率相关性更高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/663a/10599126/b2c22affef1b/jamanetwopen-e2339458-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/663a/10599126/58d8db415eaa/jamanetwopen-e2339458-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/663a/10599126/da41460602a2/jamanetwopen-e2339458-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/663a/10599126/b2c22affef1b/jamanetwopen-e2339458-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/663a/10599126/58d8db415eaa/jamanetwopen-e2339458-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/663a/10599126/da41460602a2/jamanetwopen-e2339458-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/663a/10599126/b2c22affef1b/jamanetwopen-e2339458-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
New York Heart Association Class and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire in Acute Heart Failure.纽约心脏协会心功能分级和堪萨斯城心肌病问卷在急性心力衰竭中的应用。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Oct 2;6(10):e2339458. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.39458.
2
Comparison of New York Heart Association Class and Patient-Reported Outcomes for Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.纽约心脏协会心功能分级与射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者报告结局的比较。
JAMA Cardiol. 2021 May 1;6(5):522-531. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.0372.
3
Patient-Reported Versus Physician-Assessed Health Status in Heart Failure With Reduced and Preserved Ejection Fraction From ASIAN-HF Registry.亚洲心力衰竭注册研究中射血分数降低和保留的心力衰竭患者自我报告与医生评估的健康状况
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2023 Jan;16(1):e009134. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.122.009134. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
4
Association of Serial Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Assessments With Death and Hospitalization in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved and Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Secondary Analysis of 2 Randomized Clinical Trials.连续堪萨斯城心肌病问卷评估与射血分数保留和降低的心衰患者死亡和住院的相关性:两项随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Dec 1;2(12):1315-1321. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.3983.
5
Characterization and natural history of patients with LMNA-related dilated cardiomyopathy in the phase 3 REALM-DCM trial.在3期REALM-DCM试验中,与LMNA相关的扩张型心肌病患者的特征及自然病史
ESC Heart Fail. 2024 Dec;11(6):4201-4208. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14955. Epub 2024 Aug 15.
6
Comparison Between the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire and New York Heart Association in Assessing Functional Capacity and Clinical Outcomes.堪萨斯城心肌病问卷与纽约心脏协会在评估功能能力和临床结局方面的比较
J Card Fail. 2017 Apr;23(4):280-285. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2016.12.002. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
7
Association of Dapagliflozin vs Placebo With Individual Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Components in Patients With Heart Failure With Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Secondary Analysis of the DELIVER Trial.达格列净与安慰剂对射血分数轻度降低或保留的心力衰竭患者个体堪萨斯城心肌病问卷各成分的影响:DELIVER 试验的二次分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2023 Jul 1;8(7):684-690. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2023.1342.
8
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire in Relation to New York Heart Association Class.堪萨斯城心肌病问卷与纽约心脏协会心功能分级的关系
J Card Fail. 2025 Feb;31(2):481-484. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2024.08.061. Epub 2024 Sep 28.
9
Health-Related Quality of Life and Mortality in Heart Failure: The Global Congestive Heart Failure Study of 23 000 Patients From 40 Countries.心力衰竭患者的健康相关生活质量与死亡率:来自 40 个国家的 23000 例心力衰竭患者的全球充血性心力衰竭研究。
Circulation. 2021 Jun;143(22):2129-2142. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.050850. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
10
Health Status Predicts Short- and Long-Term Risk of Composite Clinical Outcomes in Acute Heart Failure.健康状况可预测急性心力衰竭综合临床结局的短期和长期风险。
JACC Heart Fail. 2021 Dec;9(12):861-873. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2021.06.015. Epub 2021 Sep 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic evaluation of patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials of digital health in cardiovascular diseases.心血管疾病数字健康临床试验中患者报告结局的系统评价。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 May 2;8(1):238. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01637-8.
2
The Relationship Between the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire and Electrocardiographic Parameters in Predicting Outcomes After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.堪萨斯城心肌病问卷与心电图参数在预测心脏再同步治疗后结局中的关系
Life (Basel). 2024 Nov 28;14(12):1564. doi: 10.3390/life14121564.

本文引用的文献

1
Associations Between New York Heart Association Classification, Objective Measures, and Long-term Prognosis in Mild Heart Failure: A Secondary Analysis of the PARADIGM-HF Trial.纽约心脏协会分级、客观指标与轻度心力衰竭长期预后的相关性:PARADIGM-HF 试验的二次分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2023 Feb 1;8(2):150-158. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2022.4427.
2
Impact of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement in Heart Failure Clinic on Clinician Health Status Assessment and Patient Experience: A Substudy of the PRO-HF Trial.心力衰竭门诊中患者报告结局测量对临床医生健康状况评估和患者体验的影响:PRO-HF 试验的子研究。
Circ Heart Fail. 2023 Feb;16(2):e010280. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.122.010280. Epub 2022 Nov 5.
3
Comparing New York Heart Association Class and Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure.
比较因心力衰竭住院患者的纽约心脏协会分级与患者报告的结局。
Circ Heart Fail. 2023 Jan;16(1):e010107. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.122.010107. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
4
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical Research.临床研究中的患者报告结局指标
JAMA. 2022 Aug 2;328(5):472-473. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.11238.
5
2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2022年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会/美国心力衰竭学会心力衰竭管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南联合委员会报告
Circulation. 2022 May 3;145(18):e895-e1032. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001063. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
6
Mental health-related risk factors and interventions in patients with heart failure: a position paper endorsed by the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC).心力衰竭患者心理健康相关风险因素和干预措施:一项得到欧洲预防心脏病学协会(EAPC)认可的立场文件。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2022 May 25;29(7):1124-1141. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwac006.
7
2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: Developed by the Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). With the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC.2021 ESC 急性和慢性心力衰竭诊断和治疗指南:由欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)急性和慢性心力衰竭诊断和治疗工作组制定。特别感谢欧洲心脏病学会心力衰竭协会(HFA)的贡献。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2022 Jan;24(1):4-131. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2333.
8
Age and sex differences in associations between self-reported health, physical function, mental function and mortality.年龄和性别对自报健康、身体功能、心理功能与死亡率之间关联的影响差异。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2022 Jan-Feb;98:104537. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2021.104537. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
9
Health Status Predicts Short- and Long-Term Risk of Composite Clinical Outcomes in Acute Heart Failure.健康状况可预测急性心力衰竭综合临床结局的短期和长期风险。
JACC Heart Fail. 2021 Dec;9(12):861-873. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2021.06.015. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
10
How and Why Patient Concerns Influence Pain Reporting: A Qualitative Analysis of Personal Accounts and Perceptions of Others' Use of Numerical Pain Scales.患者的担忧如何以及为何会影响疼痛报告:对个人叙述以及对他人使用数字疼痛量表的看法的定性分析
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 2;12:663890. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.663890. eCollection 2021.