Matos Bruno de, Paludeto Gabriel Tonini, Neto Alcindo Cerci, Bignardi Paulo Roberto
Bratisl Lek Listy. 2023;124(11):848-855. doi: 10.4149/BLL_2023_131.
Thromboembolic events are common in hospitalized patients with COVID-19, suggesting that SARS-CoV-2 infection may be related to a prothrombotic state. Several clinical trials evaluating different anticoagulation strategies were developed. Thus, we proposed conducting a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials that evaluated the efficacy and safety of therapeutic anticoagulation with heparins in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. We searched PubMed, Cochrane, and Epistemonikos for studies published until December 22, 2022. Nine studies compared prophylactic/intermediate anticoagulation versus therapeutic anticoagulation with heparins were included. Four efficacy and one safety endpoints were analyzed: all-cause mortality, thromboembolic events, pulmonary embolism, need of intensive care unit or non-invasive ventilation, and major bleeding. Compared with prophylactic/intermediate anticoagulation, therapeutic anticoagulation with heparins was not associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality and need of intensive care unit or non-invasive ventilation in hospitalized patients with COVID-19, but showed a reduction in the number of thromboembolic events (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.41-0.71, I2 = 0 %) and pulmonary embolisms (RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.24-0.57, I2 = 0 %), besides an increase in major bleeding (RR 1.67, 95% CI 1.05-2.64, I2 = 0 %). This meta-analysis did not show a reduction in all-cause mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 who received anticoagulation with heparin at a therapeutic dose compared to those who received a prophylactic/intermediate dose, as well as no significant differences were found in the need of intensive care unit admission or use of non-invasive ventilation. There was, however, a reduction in thromboembolic events, pulmonary embolism, and increased bleeding (Tab. 1, Fig. 5, Ref. 31). Keywords: COVID-19, anticoagulation, heparins, meta-analysis.
血栓栓塞事件在新冠肺炎住院患者中很常见,这表明严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染可能与血栓前状态有关。开展了几项评估不同抗凝策略的临床试验。因此,我们提议对评估肝素治疗性抗凝在新冠肺炎住院患者中的疗效和安全性的随机临床试验进行荟萃分析。我们在PubMed、Cochrane和Epistemonikos数据库中检索截至2022年12月22日发表的研究。纳入了9项比较肝素预防性/中度抗凝与治疗性抗凝的研究。分析了4个疗效终点和1个安全性终点:全因死亡率、血栓栓塞事件、肺栓塞、入住重症监护病房或无创通气的需求以及大出血。与预防性/中度抗凝相比,肝素治疗性抗凝在新冠肺炎住院患者中与全因死亡率降低以及入住重症监护病房或无创通气需求降低无关,但血栓栓塞事件数量(风险比[RR]0.54,95%置信区间[CI]0.41 - 0.71,I² = 0%)和肺栓塞数量(RR 0.37,95% CI 0.24 - 0.57,I² = 0%)有所减少,此外大出血有所增加(RR 1.67,95% CI 1.05 - 2.64,I² = 0%)。这项荟萃分析未显示与接受预防性/中度剂量肝素抗凝的新冠肺炎住院患者相比,接受治疗剂量肝素抗凝的患者全因死亡率有所降低,在入住重症监护病房或使用无创通气方面也未发现显著差异。然而,血栓栓塞事件、肺栓塞有所减少,出血有所增加(表1、图5、参考文献31)。关键词:新冠肺炎、抗凝、肝素、荟萃分析