Servicio de Medicina Interna, Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Marina Baixa, Av Jaime Botella Mayor, 7, 03570, Villajoyosa, Alicante, Spain.
Department of Public Health, University Miguel Hernandez, Alicante, Spain.
Clin Exp Med. 2023 Aug;23(4):1189-1196. doi: 10.1007/s10238-022-00876-3. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
We carried out a meta-analysis since there is not enough evidence to recommend for or against therapeutic-dose anticoagulation compared with thromboprophylaxis in noncritically ill patients hospitalized with Covid-19.
We performed a systematic literature search using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and MedRxiv for randomized trials that included therapeutic-dose with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMW) or thromboprophylaxis with LMW heparin in noncritically ill patients admitted to the hospital with Covid-19. We identified five open-label studies for analysis with a total of 3220 patients. Two independent researchers selected, assessed, and extracted the data in duplicate. The outcomes evaluated were all-cause mortality, progression to invasive mechanical ventilation, incidence of venous thromboembolism, and major bleeding. The studies did not show risk for selection, detection, attrition, or reporting bias.
Therapeutic-dose anticoagulation with LMW heparin compared with thromboprophylaxis with LMW heparin had no significant effect of all-cause death (risk ratio [RR] 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-1.07; P = 0.16; I = 48%), or progression to invasive mechanical ventilation (RR 0.89; CI 0.73-1.08; P = 0.24; I: 0%). Therapeutic-dose anticoagulation significantly reduced the risk of venous thromboembolic disease (RR 0.42; 95% CI 0.28-0.62; P = 0.0001; I = 0%) [Number needed to treat = 37]. Major bleeding occurred in 1.79% of the patients receiving therapeutic-dose anticoagulation and in 0.97% of those receiving thromboprophylaxis [Number needed to harm 125].
Therapeutic-dose anticoagulation in noncritically ill patients with Covid-19 could be indicated for patients at high risk of venous thromboembolic disease and low risk of bleeding.
由于没有足够的证据推荐非危重症 COVID-19 住院患者进行治疗剂量抗凝治疗与血栓预防治疗,因此我们进行了这项荟萃分析。
我们使用 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆和 MedRxiv 进行了系统的文献检索,纳入了非危重症 COVID-19 住院患者接受治疗剂量低分子肝素(LMW)或血栓预防剂量 LMW 肝素的随机试验。我们分析了 5 项开放标签研究,共纳入 3220 例患者。两名独立的研究人员对数据进行了重复选择、评估和提取。评估的结局包括全因死亡率、进展为有创机械通气、静脉血栓栓塞发生率和大出血发生率。这些研究未显示出选择、检测、失访或报告偏倚的风险。
与血栓预防剂量 LMW 肝素相比,LMW 肝素的治疗剂量抗凝治疗对全因死亡(风险比 [RR] 0.85;95%置信区间 [CI] 0.67-1.07;P=0.16;I=48%)或进展为有创机械通气(RR 0.89;95% CI 0.73-1.08;P=0.24;I:0%)均无显著影响。治疗剂量抗凝治疗显著降低了静脉血栓栓塞疾病的风险(RR 0.42;95% CI 0.28-0.62;P=0.0001;I=0%)[需要治疗的人数为 37]。接受治疗剂量抗凝治疗的患者中,大出血发生率为 1.79%,接受血栓预防治疗的患者中,大出血发生率为 0.97%[需要伤害的人数为 125]。
对于静脉血栓栓塞疾病风险高且出血风险低的非危重症 COVID-19 患者,治疗剂量抗凝治疗可能是合理的。