• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲基于价值的医疗保健基准评估:从理论到实践

European value-based healthcare benchmarking: moving from theory to practice.

作者信息

García-Lorenzo Borja, Gorostiza Ania, Alayo Itxaso, Castelo Zas Susana, Cobos Baena Patricia, Gallego Camiña Inés, Izaguirre Narbaiza Begoña, Mallabiabarrena Gaizka, Ustarroz-Aguirre Iker, Rigabert Alina, Balzi William, Maltoni Roberta, Massa Ilaria, Álvarez López Isabel, Arévalo Lobera Sara, Esteban Mónica, Fernández Calleja Marta, Gómez Mediavilla Jenifer, Fernández Manuela, Del Oro Hitar Manuel, Ortega Torres María Del Carmen, Sanz Ferrandez María Consuelo, Manso Sánchez Luís, Serrano Balazote Pablo, Varela Rodríguez Carolina, Campone Mario, Le Lann Sophie, Vercauter Piet, Tournoy Kurt, Borges Marina, Oliveira Ana Sofía, Soares Marta, Fullaondo Ane

机构信息

Biosistemak Institute for Health Systems Research, Torre del Bilbao Exhibition Centre, Barakaldo, Spain.

Osakidetza Basque Health Service, Ezkerraldea Enkarterri Cruces Integrated Health Organisation, Innovation and Quality Assistant Service, Barakaldo-Bizkaia, Spain.

出版信息

Eur J Public Health. 2024 Feb 5;34(1):44-51. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad181.

DOI:10.1093/eurpub/ckad181
PMID:37875008
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10843953/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Value-based healthcare (VBHC) is a conceptual framework to improve the value of healthcare by health, care-process and economic outcomes. Benchmarking should provide useful information to identify best practices and therefore a good instrument to improve quality across healthcare organizations. This paper aims to provide a proof-of-concept of the feasibility of an international VBHC benchmarking in breast cancer, with the ultimate aim of being used to share best practices with a data-driven approach among healthcare organizations from different health systems.

METHODS

In the VOICE community-a European healthcare centre cluster intending to address VBHC from theory to practice-information on patient-reported, clinical-related, care-process-related and economic-related outcomes were collected. Patient archetypes were identified using clustering techniques and an indicator set following a modified Delphi was defined. Benchmarking was performed using regression models controlling for patient archetypes and socio-demographic characteristics.

RESULTS

Six hundred and ninety patients from six healthcare centres were included. A set of 50 health, care-process and economic indicators was distilled for benchmarking. Statistically significant differences across sites have been found in most health outcomes, half of the care-process indicators, and all economic indicators, allowing for identifying the best and worst performers.

CONCLUSIONS

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first international experience providing evidence to be used with VBHC benchmarking intention. Differences in indicators across healthcare centres should be used to identify best practices and improve healthcare quality following further research. Applied methods might help to move forward with VBHC benchmarking in other medical conditions.

摘要

背景

基于价值的医疗保健(VBHC)是一个概念框架,旨在通过健康、护理过程和经济结果来提高医疗保健的价值。基准评估应提供有用信息以识别最佳实践,因此是提高各医疗保健组织质量的良好工具。本文旨在提供乳腺癌国际VBHC基准评估可行性的概念验证,最终目标是用于在不同卫生系统的医疗保健组织之间以数据驱动的方法分享最佳实践。

方法

在VOICE社区(一个旨在将VBHC从理论应用到实践的欧洲医疗保健中心集群)中,收集了患者报告的、临床相关的、护理过程相关的和经济相关结果的信息。使用聚类技术识别患者原型,并定义了经过改进的德尔菲法后的指标集。使用控制患者原型和社会人口特征的回归模型进行基准评估。

结果

纳入了来自六个医疗保健中心的690名患者。提炼出一组50个健康、护理过程和经济指标用于基准评估。在大多数健康结果、一半的护理过程指标和所有经济指标方面,各站点之间发现了具有统计学意义的差异,从而能够识别表现最佳和最差的机构。

结论

据我们所知,这是首次提供具有VBHC基准评估意图的证据的国际经验。医疗保健中心之间指标的差异应被用于识别最佳实践,并在进一步研究后提高医疗保健质量。应用的方法可能有助于推动其他医疗状况下的VBHC基准评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b35/10843953/215da4ba28fa/ckad181f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b35/10843953/c0d47c6a765f/ckad181f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b35/10843953/215da4ba28fa/ckad181f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b35/10843953/c0d47c6a765f/ckad181f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b35/10843953/215da4ba28fa/ckad181f2.jpg

相似文献

1
European value-based healthcare benchmarking: moving from theory to practice.欧洲基于价值的医疗保健基准评估:从理论到实践
Eur J Public Health. 2024 Feb 5;34(1):44-51. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad181.
2
Chronic Kidney Disease: Exploring Value-Based Healthcare as a Potential Viable Solution.慢性肾脏病:探索基于价值的医疗保健作为一种潜在可行的解决方案。
Blood Purif. 2019;47(1-3):156-165. doi: 10.1159/000496681. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
3
Five years' experience with value-based quality improvement teams: the key factors to a successful implementation in hospital care.五年基于价值的质量改进团队经验:医院护理中成功实施的关键因素。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Oct 20;22(1):1271. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08563-5.
4
Disentangling the value equation: a step forward in value-based healthcare.解析价值等式:基于价值的医疗保健向前迈进的一步。
Eur J Public Health. 2024 Aug 1;34(4):632-638. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckae060.
5
Value based healthcare - principles and recommendations for organizational solutions in Poland.基于价值的医疗保健 - 波兰组织解决方案的原则和建议。
Przegl Epidemiol. 2020;74(4):707-715. doi: 10.32394/pe.74.62.
6
Towards Efficient Value-Based Healthcare Measurement Across Hospital Care Pathways - A Scoping Review.迈向基于价值的高效医疗保健测量:医院护理路径的范围综述。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2024 Aug 22;316:1834-1838. doi: 10.3233/SHTI240788.
7
[Efficiency versus quality in the NHS, in Portugal: methodologies for evaluation].葡萄牙国民医疗服务体系中的效率与质量:评估方法
Acta Med Port. 2008 Sep-Oct;21(5):397-410. Epub 2009 Jan 16.
8
Value-Based Healthcare: A Primer for the Dermatologist.基于价值的医疗保健:皮肤科医生入门指南。
Dermatology. 2024;240(5-6):814-822. doi: 10.1159/000539372. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
9
Introducing value-based healthcare perspectives into hospital performance assessment: A scoping review.引入基于价值的医疗保健观点进行医院绩效评估:范围综述。
J Evid Based Med. 2023 Jun;16(2):200-215. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12534. Epub 2023 May 25.
10
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Disentangling the value equation: a step forward in value-based healthcare.解析价值等式:基于价值的医疗保健向前迈进的一步。
Eur J Public Health. 2024 Aug 1;34(4):632-638. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckae060.

本文引用的文献

1
The use of patient-reported outcome and experience measures for health policy purposes: A scoping review in oncology.基于患者报告结局和体验测量指标的卫生政策应用:肿瘤学领域的范围综述。
Health Policy. 2023 Mar;129:104702. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.12.010. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
2
Current and future burden of breast cancer: Global statistics for 2020 and 2040.乳腺癌的现状和未来负担:2020 年和 2040 年全球统计数据。
Breast. 2022 Dec;66:15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.08.010. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
3
The Roadmap for Implementing Value-Based Healthcare in European University Hospitals-Consensus Report and Recommendations.
《实施欧洲大学附属医院基于价值的医疗保健路线图:共识报告和建议》
Value Health. 2022 Jul;25(7):1148-1156. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.11.1355. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
4
Health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients: review of reviews from 2008 to 2018.乳腺癌患者的健康相关生活质量:2008 年至 2018 年的综述回顾。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Oct 12;18(1):338. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01591-x.
5
Understanding unwarranted variation in clinical practice: a focus on network effects, reflective medicine and learning health systems.理解临床实践中不必要的差异:关注网络效应、反思性医学和学习型健康系统。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2020 Jun 4;32(4):271-274. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaa023.
6
Defining and Implementing Value-Based Health Care: A Strategic Framework.定义和实施基于价值的医疗保健:战略框架。
Acad Med. 2020 May;95(5):682-685. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003122.
7
Template matching for benchmarking hospital performance in the veterans affairs healthcare system.用于评估退伍军人事务医疗系统中医院绩效的模板匹配
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 May;98(20):e15644. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015644.
8
Quality indicators in breast cancer care: An update from the EUSOMA working group.乳腺癌护理质量指标:EUSOMA工作组的最新报告。
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Nov;86:59-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.08.017. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
9
A Delphi study to develop indicators of cancer patient experience for quality improvement.一项用于制定癌症患者体验指标以改进质量的德尔菲研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2018 Jan;26(1):129-138. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3823-4. Epub 2017 Jul 15.
10
A Standard Set of Value-Based Patient-Centered Outcomes for Breast Cancer: The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) Initiative.基于价值的乳腺癌患者为中心的结局标准集:国际健康结果测量联合会(ICHOM)倡议。
JAMA Oncol. 2017 May 1;3(5):677-685. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.4851.