Rheumatic Disease Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Phramongkutklao Hospital and College of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand.
Int J Rheum Dis. 2023 Dec;26(12):2509-2516. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.14949. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the effect of the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Score (SLE-DAS) with the SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) remission state on damage accrual.
This study classified SLE patients from the Lupus Clinic of the Royal Thai Army (LUCRA) cohort based on the SLE-DAS index, or Boolean-based, and SLEDAI-2K (Doria) remission state. Regression analysis models were constructed to identify predictors of the Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index (SDI) during follow-up.
There were 197 patients identified; 97 patients met at least one definition of remission state, and 100 patients were in the non-remission group at enrollment. Of 97 patients, 97 achieved the SLE-DAS index-based definition, 74 achieved the SLE-DAS Boolean-based definition, and 55 achieved the Doria definition. The mean ± SD of follow-up was 4.77 ± 0.6 years. The changes in SDI over time were non-significantly lower in patients who met any definition of remission compared with those who did not. Multivariate analysis revealed that predictive factors for increased SDI were age and baseline SDI ≥ 1. SLE-DAS index, Boolean, and Doria-based definitions of remission at enrollment had no significant risk reduction on SDI compared with the non-remission group (HR 0.7, 95% CI 0.37-1.32, p = .27; HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.37-1.44, p = .37; HR 0.8, 95% CI 0.39-1.65, p = .55, respectively).
Patients with SLE who achieved remission status according to the SLE-DAS index or SLEDAI-2K definitions did not show any significant difference in damage accrual compared to those who were not in remission.
背景/目的:本研究旨在比较系统性红斑狼疮疾病活动度评分(SLE-DAS)与系统性红斑狼疮疾病活动指数 2000(SLEDAI-2K)缓解状态对累积损害的影响。
本研究根据 SLE-DAS 指数或基于布尔的 SLEDAI-2K(Doria)缓解状态,对来自泰国皇家陆军狼疮诊所(LUCRA)队列的 SLE 患者进行分类。构建回归分析模型以确定随访期间狼疮国际协作诊所/美国风湿病学会损害指数(SDI)的预测因素。
共确定了 197 名患者;97 名患者至少符合一种缓解状态定义,100 名患者在入组时处于非缓解组。在 97 名患者中,97 名患者符合 SLE-DAS 指数定义,74 名患者符合 SLE-DAS 布尔定义,55 名患者符合 Doria 定义。随访的平均随访时间为 4.77±0.6 年。与未达到缓解标准的患者相比,任何缓解标准的患者 SDI 的变化均无统计学意义。多变量分析显示,SDI 增加的预测因素是年龄和基线 SDI≥1。与非缓解组相比,SLE-DAS 指数、布尔和 Doria 定义的缓解在入组时对 SDI 没有显著的降低风险(HR 0.7,95%CI 0.37-1.32,p=0.27;HR 0.73,95%CI 0.37-1.44,p=0.37;HR 0.8,95%CI 0.39-1.65,p=0.55)。
根据 SLE-DAS 指数或 SLEDAI-2K 定义达到缓解状态的 SLE 患者与未缓解的患者相比,在累积损害方面没有明显差异。