• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“我已经放弃做母亲了”:183 名女性行腹扎术(TAC)的经历调查。

"I had given up on being a mother": a survey of 183 women's experience of transabdominal cerclage (TAC).

机构信息

Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.

UK TAC Support, Margate, UK.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Oct 24;23(1):751. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-06001-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12884-023-06001-w
PMID:37875796
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10599032/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transabdominal cerclage (TAC) is a relatively uncommon intervention for preventing preterm birth. This study aimed to investigate the experience of women who had undergone this procedure.

METHODS

The survey was designed in collaboration with a preterm birth studies public and patient involvement (PPI) group and ethical approval was granted by KCL BDM Research Ethics Panel (LRS-19/20-13205). Members of closed Facebook group, UK TAC Support, were invited to complete an online questionnaire about their experience of TAC, and pregnancies before and after having it placed. The survey was open between December 2019 and May 2020. Open and closed questions provided both qualitative and quantitative data for analysis, which was carried out using NVivo Pro 2020 v.1.4.1 qualitative data management software and SPSS Statistics 27 (IBM).

RESULTS

One hundred eighty-three participants completed the survey, having had TAC procedures carried out in 36 hospitals. Altogether, participants had experienced 287 preterm births (PTB) and late miscarriages (LM), equating to an average of 1.6 each (range 0-5), including 18 stillbirths. TAC was indicated in 123 (67%) for previous PTB and/or LM, 29 (16%) for cervical surgery and 31 (17%) for both. 151 (83%) TAC procedures were open, 32 (17%) laparoscopic. 86% (n = 157) were placed outside pregnancy. Of those placed in pregnancy, gestation at TAC ranged from 7 to 16 weeks. When comparing earliest pre- and post-TAC pregnancy gestation (excluding first trimester losses), median gestational weeks gained following TAC was 15.5 weeks (SD 6.89). Qualitative themes included: the struggle to get treatment; lack of TAC knowledge amongst clinicians; gratitude, hope and feeling protected; possible detrimental effects of TAC.

CONCLUSIONS

This very high-risk group found having a TAC gave great reassurance and hope, and were very grateful to have found the care they needed. However, they often struggled to get this support, frequently due to lack of clinician awareness. This may improve following roll-out of NHS England's Saving Babies Live Care Bundle and NHS commissioning guidelines for care of women at risk of PTB.

摘要

背景

经腹宫颈环扎术(TAC)是一种预防早产的相对少见的干预措施。本研究旨在调查接受该手术的女性的经验。

方法

该调查由早产研究公众和患者参与(PPI)小组合作设计,并获得 KCL BDM 研究伦理小组(LRS-19/20-13205)的伦理批准。封闭式 Facebook 群组 UK TAC Support 的成员被邀请完成一份关于 TAC 经历以及接受 TAC 前后妊娠的在线问卷。调查于 2019 年 12 月至 2020 年 5 月期间开放。开放式和封闭式问题为分析提供了定性和定量数据,使用 NVivo Pro 2020 v.1.4.1 定性数据管理软件和 SPSS Statistics 27(IBM)进行分析。

结果

183 名参与者完成了调查,他们在 36 家医院接受了 TAC 手术。总的来说,参与者经历了 287 次早产(PTB)和晚期流产(LM),平均每人经历了 1.6 次(范围 0-5),包括 18 例死产。123 例(67%)因既往 PTB 和/或 LM 而进行 TAC,29 例(16%)因宫颈手术而进行 TAC,31 例(17%)因两者兼有而进行 TAC。151 例(83%)TAC 手术为开放式,32 例(17%)为腹腔镜式。86%(n=157)TAC 手术在妊娠前进行。在妊娠中进行 TAC 的病例中,TAC 的妊娠周数范围为 7 至 16 周。比较 TAC 前和 TAC 后最早的妊娠周数(不包括早期妊娠丢失),TAC 后获得的中位妊娠周数为 15.5 周(SD 6.89)。定性主题包括:争取治疗的斗争;临床医生对 TAC 的知识缺乏;感激、希望和受到保护的感觉;TAC 可能产生的不利影响。

结论

这个高风险群体发现进行 TAC 会带来极大的安慰和希望,并且非常感激能够获得所需的护理。然而,他们通常很难获得这种支持,这主要是由于临床医生缺乏意识。在英国国民保健署推出“拯救婴儿生命护理包”和国家卫生服务委员会发布针对早产风险妇女护理指南后,这种情况可能会有所改善。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36e9/10599032/eb09ee5777aa/12884_2023_6001_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36e9/10599032/eb09ee5777aa/12884_2023_6001_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36e9/10599032/eb09ee5777aa/12884_2023_6001_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
"I had given up on being a mother": a survey of 183 women's experience of transabdominal cerclage (TAC).“我已经放弃做母亲了”:183 名女性行腹扎术(TAC)的经历调查。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Oct 24;23(1):751. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-06001-w.
2
Cervical stitch (cerclage) in combination with other treatments for preventing spontaneous preterm birth in singleton pregnancies.宫颈环扎术联合其他治疗方法用于预防单胎妊娠自发性早产。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 24;9(9):CD012871. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012871.pub2.
3
Efficacy of ultrasound-indicated cerclage in twin pregnancies: a retrospective case-control study matched by cervical length.超声引导下宫颈环扎术在双胎妊娠中的疗效:一项根据宫颈长度匹配的回顾性病例对照研究
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 Mar;5(3):100847. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100847. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
4
Transabdominal cerclage: preconceptual versus first trimester insertion.经腹宫颈环扎术:孕前与孕早期置入
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Apr;199:27-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.01.035. Epub 2016 Feb 8.
5
Outcomes after transabdominal cerclage in twin pregnancy with previous unsuccessful transvaginal cerclage.经阴道宫颈环扎术失败的双胎妊娠经腹宫颈环扎术的结局。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 30;15(4):e0232463. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232463. eCollection 2020.
6
Robot-assisted transabdominal cerclage for the prevention of preterm birth: A multicenter experience.机器人辅助经腹宫颈环扎术预防早产:一项多中心经验
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Jan;232:70-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.11.013. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
7
Cerclage in surgically shortened uterine cervix and pregnancy outcome: A retrospective comparison between the abdominal and vaginal procedures.宫颈环扎术在缩短的子宫颈中的应用及其妊娠结局:腹部和阴道手术的回顾性比较。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2022 Dec;48(12):3087-3092. doi: 10.1111/jog.15428. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
8
Longitudinal change in cervical length following vaginal or abdominal cervical cerclage: a randomized comparison.经阴道或经腹宫颈环扎术后宫颈长度的纵向变化:一项随机比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 Jul;5(7):100987. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.100987. Epub 2023 May 4.
9
Obstetric outcomes of transabdominal cerclage: A retrospective observational study in Japan.经腹环扎术的产科结局:日本的一项回顾性观察研究。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2024 Oct;50(10):1835-1840. doi: 10.1111/jog.16063. Epub 2024 Aug 25.
10
MAVRIC: a multicenter randomized controlled trial of transabdominal vs transvaginal cervical cerclage.MAVRIC:经腹与经阴道宫颈环扎术的多中心随机对照试验。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Mar;222(3):261.e1-261.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.09.040. Epub 2019 Oct 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Women's Pregnancy Experiences With a Transvaginal Cervical Cerclage: A Qualitative Study.经阴道宫颈环扎术的女性妊娠经历:一项定性研究
BJOG. 2025 Sep;132(10):1481-1488. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.18218. Epub 2025 May 14.
2
Embedding the patient voice into research on spontaneous preterm birth-themes from a Preterm Birth Advisory Council.将患者声音融入自然早产研究——早产咨询委员会的主题
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 20;19(12):e0312370. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312370. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy of transvaginal cervical cerclage in women at risk of preterm birth following previous emergency cesarean section.经阴道宫颈环扎术在有剖宫产史的早产高危孕妇中的疗效。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Nov;99(11):1486-1491. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13972. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
2
MAVRIC: a multicenter randomized controlled trial of transabdominal vs transvaginal cervical cerclage.MAVRIC:经腹与经阴道宫颈环扎术的多中心随机对照试验。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Mar;222(3):261.e1-261.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.09.040. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
3
Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancy.
宫颈环扎术用于预防单胎妊娠早产。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 6;6(6):CD008991. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008991.pub3.
4
Full dilation cesarean section: a risk factor for recurrent second-trimester loss and preterm birth.完全扩张剖宫产:孕中期复发性流产和早产的一个风险因素。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017 Sep;96(9):1100-1105. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13160. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
5
What is the impact of preconception abdominal cerclage on fertility: evidence from a randomized controlled trial.孕前宫颈环扎术对生育能力有何影响:一项随机对照试验的证据
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017 May;96(5):543-546. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13107. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
6
Successful vaginal delivery following an abdominal cerclage, predicted by serial vaginal cervical ultrasound.经腹部宫颈环扎术后成功经阴道分娩,由系列经阴道宫颈超声预测。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016 Jul;36(5):674-5. doi: 10.3109/01443615.2015.1103720. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
7
Incidence, risk factors and treatment of cervical stenosis after radical trachelectomy: A systematic review.根治性宫颈切除术(radical trachelectomy)后宫颈狭窄的发生率、风险因素和治疗:系统评价。
Eur J Cancer. 2015 Sep;51(13):1751-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.05.012. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
8
Randomised trial of cervical cerclage, with and without occlusion, for the prevention of preterm birth in women suspected for cervical insufficiency.随机对照试验研究宫颈环扎术联合或不联合宫颈环扎术阻塞术预防疑似宫颈功能不全孕妇早产的效果。
BJOG. 2013 Apr;120(5):613-20. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12119. Epub 2013 Jan 18.
9
National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: a systematic analysis and implications.2010 年全球、区域和国家早产率估计及其自 1990 年以来的时间趋势:系统分析与意义。
Lancet. 2012 Jun 9;379(9832):2162-72. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60820-4.
10
Transabdominal cerclage: can we predict who fails?经腹宫颈环扎术:我们能预测哪些人会失败吗?
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2007 Jan;20(1):63-7. doi: 10.1080/14767050601059156.