• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

带有偏心种植体植入的混合基台-冠修复体的保留率:冠材料和钛基台高度的影响。

Retention of hybrid-abutment-crowns with offset implant placement: influence of Crown materials and Ti-base height.

机构信息

Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, El Gomhouria St, P.O. Box 35516, Mansoura, Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2023 Oct 24;23(1):784. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03490-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12903-023-03490-1
PMID:37875871
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10594673/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the current study was to assess the impact of three esthetic CAD/CAM material, titanium base height and their interaction on the retention strength of a hybrid-abutment-crown.

METHODS

A total of 42 hybrid-abutment crowns with identical external geometries were designed in CAD software to fit two different Ti-Base abutment heights (n = 42/abutment height): either short (S) with 4 mm (n = 21) or long (L) 7 mm (n = 21) height. Each main group was divided into 3 subgroups (n = 7), according to esthetic crown material, Zirconia (Z), Lithium disilicate (L) and Hybrid ceramic (V). A universal primer and an adhesive resin cement were used for bonding according to the manufacturer instructions. Artificial aging in form of water storage (30 days), chewing simulation (50,000-cycles, 49 N, 1.67 Hz) and thermal cyclic (5000 cycles at 5-55 °C) were applied, specimens were pulled-out under tension load in (N) using a universal testing machine. Two and one-way ANOVA and Post Hoc Tukey test were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Long lithium disilicate (LL) group showed the highest retention (738.7 ± 178.5) followed by short lithium disilicate (LS) group (688.6 ± 169.9). Meanwhile, short zirconia (ZS) showed the lowest retention strength (231.1 ± 86.9).

CONCLUSION

CAD/CAM fabricated lithium disilicate hybrid-abutment-crown can be used instead of conventional crowns over implant abutment. Etchable ceramics are recommended as a material of choice for CAD/CAM fabricated hybrid-abutment-crowns instead of zirconia in terms of retention durability.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估三种美学 CAD/CAM 材料、钛基底高度及其相互作用对混合基台-冠固位力的影响。

方法

共设计了 42 个具有相同外部几何形状的混合基台冠,以适合两种不同的 Ti-Base 基台高度(n=42/基台高度):高度为 4mm 的短(S)基台(n=21)或高度为 7mm 的长(L)基台(n=21)。每个主要组根据美学冠材料分为 3 个亚组(n=7),分别为氧化锆(Z)、锂硅玻璃陶瓷(L)和混合陶瓷(V)。根据制造商的说明,使用通用底涂剂和黏结树脂水门汀进行黏结。采用水储存(30 天)、咀嚼模拟(50000 次循环,49N,1.67Hz)和热循环(5-55°C 下 5000 次循环)进行人工老化,使用万能试验机在张力(N)下进行试件拔出试验。采用双因素和单因素方差分析以及事后 Tukey 检验进行统计学分析。

结果

长锂硅玻璃陶瓷(LL)组的固位力最高(738.7±178.5),其次是短锂硅玻璃陶瓷(LS)组(688.6±169.9)。同时,短氧化锆(ZS)组的固位力最低(231.1±86.9)。

结论

CAD/CAM 制作的锂硅玻璃陶瓷混合基台-冠可替代常规冠覆盖种植体基台。从固位耐久性的角度来看,建议在 CAD/CAM 制作的混合基台-冠中,陶瓷材料首选可酸蚀陶瓷,而不是氧化锆。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6399/10594673/a828da8dc255/12903_2023_3490_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6399/10594673/8dc262066c1f/12903_2023_3490_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6399/10594673/a259e495fec3/12903_2023_3490_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6399/10594673/0234f95f971c/12903_2023_3490_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6399/10594673/ab866ee2ee7f/12903_2023_3490_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6399/10594673/d1e5641a3c51/12903_2023_3490_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6399/10594673/a828da8dc255/12903_2023_3490_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6399/10594673/8dc262066c1f/12903_2023_3490_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6399/10594673/a259e495fec3/12903_2023_3490_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6399/10594673/0234f95f971c/12903_2023_3490_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6399/10594673/ab866ee2ee7f/12903_2023_3490_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6399/10594673/d1e5641a3c51/12903_2023_3490_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6399/10594673/a828da8dc255/12903_2023_3490_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Retention of hybrid-abutment-crowns with offset implant placement: influence of Crown materials and Ti-base height.带有偏心种植体植入的混合基台-冠修复体的保留率:冠材料和钛基台高度的影响。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Oct 24;23(1):784. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03490-1.
2
Failure Load of Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Implant-Supported Single Crowns Bonded to Ti-base Abutments versus to Customized Ceramic Abutments after Fatigue.疲劳后整体式二硅酸锂植入物支持的单冠与钛基基台粘结与定制陶瓷基台粘结的失败负荷。
J Prosthodont. 2022 Feb;31(2):136-146. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13369. Epub 2021 May 4.
3
Mechanical stability of fully personalized, abutment-free zirconia implant crowns on a novel implant-crown interface.新型种植体-冠界面上全个性化、无基台氧化锆种植体冠的机械稳定性。
J Dent. 2022 Jun;121:104121. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104121. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
4
Mechanical behavior of posterior all-ceramic hybrid-abutment-crowns versus hybrid-abutments with separate crowns-A laboratory study.全瓷混合基台-冠桥与分体冠桥的机械行为比较-一项实验室研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019 Jan;30(1):90-98. doi: 10.1111/clr.13395. Epub 2018 Dec 23.
5
Fatigue and Stress Distribution Analyses of Ceramic-Reinforced PEEK Abutments Restored with Monolithic Zirconia Crowns as an Alternative to Conventional Esthetic Abutments.陶瓷增强型聚醚醚酮(PEEK)基台修复单块氧化锆全瓷冠替代常规美学基台的疲劳和应力分布分析
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2022 May-Jun;37(3):533-542. doi: 10.11607/jomi.9334.
6
Fracture Resistance of Titanium, Zirconia, and Ceramic-Reinforced Polyetheretherketone Implant Abutments Supporting CAD/CAM Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Ceramic Crowns After Aging.钛、氧化锆和陶瓷增强聚醚醚酮种植体基台支持 CAD/CAM 整体式氧化锂硅陶瓷冠在老化后的抗折强度。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 May/June;34(3):622–630. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7036. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
7
Mechanical stability of zirconia meso-abutments bonded to titanium bases restored with different monolithic all-ceramic crowns.氧化锆中桥接基台与不同整体式全瓷冠修复的钛基的机械稳定性。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 September/October;34(5):1091–1097. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7431. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
8
Mechanical stability and technical outcomes of monolithic CAD/CAM fabricated abutment-crowns supported by titanium bases: An in vitro study.基于钛基底的整体式 CAD/CAM 制作的基台-冠的机械稳定性和技术效果:一项体外研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021 Feb;32(2):222-232. doi: 10.1111/clr.13693. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
9
Monolithic hybrid abutment crowns: Influence of crown height, crown morphology and material on the implant-abutment complex.整体式混合基台冠:冠高度、冠形态和材料对种植体-基台复合体的影响。
J Prosthodont Res. 2024 Oct 16;68(4):606-614. doi: 10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_23_00253. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
10
Fracture resistance of crowns cemented on titanium and zirconia implant abutments: a comparison of monolithic versus manually veneered all-ceramic systems.钛和氧化锆种植体基台烤瓷冠的抗折裂性能:全瓷单体冠与手工堆塑烤瓷冠的比较。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Nov-Dec;27(6):1448-55.

引用本文的文献

1
Retention of CAD-CAM Implant-Supported Ceramic Restorations Luted to Titanium Bases: A Systematic Review of in-vitro Studies.黏附于钛基的CAD-CAM种植体支持的陶瓷修复体的留存率:体外研究的系统评价
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2025 Aug 1;17:305-333. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S540951. eCollection 2025.
2
Influence of Abutment Geometry on Zirconia Crown Retention: An In Vitro Study.基台几何形状对氧化锆全冠固位力的影响:一项体外研究。
Materials (Basel). 2025 May 24;18(11):2469. doi: 10.3390/ma18112469.
3
How Much is Stable the Bonding of CAD-CAM Implant-Supported All-Ceramic Restorations to Titanium Bases Clinically? A Systematic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Tensile Bond Strength and Retention of Three Types of Ceramic Endocrowns.三种类型陶瓷内冠的拉伸粘结强度和固位力
J Dent (Shiraz). 2023 Mar;24(1):34-40. doi: 10.30476/DENTJODS.2022.92053.1619.
2
Retentive Strength of CAD/CAM-Fabricated All-Ceramic Crowns Luted on Titanium Implant Abutments Using Different Ceramic Materials and Luting Agents: An In Vitro Study.使用不同陶瓷材料和粘结剂在钛种植体基台上粘结的CAD/CAM制作全瓷冠的固位强度:一项体外研究
Materials (Basel). 2022 Oct 7;15(19):6968. doi: 10.3390/ma15196968.
3
Retention of different CAD/CAM endocrowns bonded to severely damaged endodontically treated teeth: An study.
CAD-CAM种植体支持的全瓷修复体与钛基在临床上的结合稳定性如何?一项系统评价。
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2025 Mar 26;17:181-200. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S510760. eCollection 2025.
4
Influence of the use of an adhesive connection on the joint strength of modular hip endoprostheses.黏合连接的使用对模块化髋关节假体接头强度的影响。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 18;19(11):e0313964. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313964. eCollection 2024.
5
Monolithic Hybrid Abutment Crowns (Screw-Retained) Versus Monolithic Hybrid Abutments With Monolithic Crowns (Adhesively Cemented): Three-Year Data of a Prospective Clinical Split-Mouth Study.整体式混合基台冠(螺丝固位)与带整体式冠的整体式混合基台(粘结固定):一项前瞻性临床双侧对照研究的三年数据
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2025 Jan;37(1):126-141. doi: 10.1111/jerd.13335. Epub 2024 Oct 26.
6
Static and dynamic stress analysis of different crown materials on a titanium base abutment in an implant-supported single crown: a 3D finite element analysis.不同冠材料对钛基种植体支持单冠的静态和动态应力分析:三维有限元分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 May 10;24(1):545. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04328-0.
7
Correction: Retention of hybrid-abutment-crowns with offset implant placement: influence of Crown materials and Ti-base height.更正:偏置种植体植入时混合基台冠的固位:冠材料和钛基高度的影响
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Feb 7;24(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03843-w.
不同 CAD/CAM 嵌体修复严重受损根管治疗后牙的保留率:一项研究。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2021 Jul-Sep;21(3):269-275. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_91_21.
4
Cementation Protocol for Bonding Zirconia Crowns to Titanium Base CAD/CAM Abutments.氧化锆全瓷冠粘结到钛基底 CAD/CAM 基台的粘结方案。
Int J Prosthodont. 2020 Sep/Oct;33(5):527-535. doi: 10.11607/ijp.6696.
5
Effect of airborne-particle abrasion of a titanium base abutment on the stability of the bonded interface and retention forces of crowns after artificial aging.空气中颗粒喷砂对钛基底台粘接界面稳定性及人工老化后冠固位力的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Aug;126(2):214-221. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.06.013. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
6
Evaluation of Adhesion Protocol for Titanium Base Abutments to Different Ceramic and Hybrid Materials.钛基基台与不同陶瓷及混合材料黏附方案的评估。
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2021 Feb 25;29(1):22-34. doi: 10.1922/EJPRD_2073Dhesi13.
7
Effect of Various Surface Treatments on Ti-Base Coping Retention.不同表面处理方法对钛基底全冠固位力的影响。
Oper Dent. 2020 Jul 1;45(4):426-434. doi: 10.2341/19-155-LR.
8
Clinical Recommendations for Implant Abutment Selection for Single-Implant Reconstructions: Customized vs Standardized Ceramic and Metallic Solutions.单颗种植体修复中种植体基台选择的临床建议:定制化与标准化陶瓷及金属解决方案
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2020 Jan/Feb;40(1):31-37. doi: 10.11607/prd.3913.
9
Monolithic CAD-CAM lithium disilicate versus monolithic CAD-CAM zirconia for single implant-supported posterior crowns using a digital workflow: A 3-year cross-sectional retrospective study.采用数字化工作流程的单种植体支持后牙冠的整体式 CAD-CAM 二硅酸锂与整体式 CAD-CAM 氧化锆的比较:一项为期 3 年的回顾性横断面研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Feb;123(2):252-256. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.11.016. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
10
Mechanical stability of zirconia meso-abutments bonded to titanium bases restored with different monolithic all-ceramic crowns.氧化锆中桥接基台与不同整体式全瓷冠修复的钛基的机械稳定性。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 September/October;34(5):1091–1097. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7431. Epub 2019 Apr 1.