Department of Health Care Management, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Hamburg Center for Health Economics (HCHE), Hamburg, Germany.
Health Econ. 2024 Feb;33(2):229-247. doi: 10.1002/hec.4771. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
We investigated the impact of an integrated care initiative in a socially deprived urban area in Germany. Using administrative data, we empirically assessed the causal effect of its two sub-interventions, which differed by the extent to which their instruments targeted the supply and demand side of healthcare provision. We addressed confounding using propensity score matching via the Super Learner machine learning algorithm. For our baseline model, we used a two-way fixed-effects difference-in-differences approach to identify causal effects. We then employed difference-in-differences analyses within an event-study framework to explore the heterogeneity of treatment effects over time, allowing us to disentangle the effects of the sub-interventions and improve causal interpretation and generalizability. The initiative led to a significant increase in hospital and emergency admissions and non-hospital outpatient visits, as well as inpatient, non-hospital outpatient, and total costs. Increased utilization may indicate that the intervention improved access to care or identified unmet need.
我们研究了德国一个社会贫困城市地区综合医疗保健计划的影响。我们利用行政数据,通过超级学习者机器学习算法进行倾向评分匹配,实证评估了其两个子干预措施的因果效应,这两个子干预措施在多大程度上针对医疗保健提供的供需双方。对于我们的基线模型,我们使用双向固定效应差异中的差异方法来确定因果效应。然后,我们在事件研究框架内使用差异中的差异分析来随时间探索治疗效果的异质性,这使我们能够区分子干预措施的效果,并提高因果解释和推广的能力。该计划导致医院和急诊入院以及非医院门诊就诊次数以及住院、非医院门诊和总费用显著增加。利用率的增加可能表明干预措施改善了获得护理的机会或发现了未满足的需求。