Department of Genetics, Kaiser Permanente Oakland Medical Center, Oakland, California, USA.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
J Genet Couns. 2024 Oct;33(5):943-951. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1819. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
Critically examining the way that the field of clinical genetics has impacted queer communities offers the field an opportunity to strengthen our commitment to inclusive high-quality care to all patients, families, and communities. This article reviews the origins of clinical genetics and genetic counseling in the eugenics movement and how this ontology promoted harmful medical practices grounded in assumptions of what is "normal." We critically examine existing clinical genetics practices and how commonly used binary frameworks for gender, sex, and sexuality perpetuate heteronormative, cisnormative, and bioessentialist assumptions. In order to move toward queer inclusivity, the genetic counseling field must first take accountability for past injustices. Restorative justice and trauma-informed approaches offer a way to engage with the queer community and to begin to rectify the history of medical harm. Through our analysis, we advocate for expanding efforts to depathologize queerness, promote bodily autonomy, and provide equitable healthcare for the queer community.
批判性地审视临床遗传学领域对酷儿群体的影响,为该领域提供了一个机会,使其能够加强我们对所有患者、家庭和社区提供包容和高质量护理的承诺。本文回顾了优生学运动中临床遗传学和遗传咨询的起源,以及这种本体论如何促进了基于“正常”假设的有害医疗实践。我们批判性地审视了现有的临床遗传学实践,以及性别、性和性取向的常用二元框架如何延续了异性恋、顺性别和生物本质主义的假设。为了实现酷儿包容,遗传咨询领域必须首先对过去的不公正行为负责。恢复性司法和创伤知情方法为与酷儿社区接触并开始纠正医疗伤害的历史提供了一种途径。通过我们的分析,我们主张扩大努力,消除酷儿的病态化,促进身体自主,并为酷儿社区提供公平的医疗保健。