Centre for Human Movement and Rehabilitation Research, School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Salford, Greater Manchester, UK.
Occupational Therapy, School of Health & Wellbeing, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK.
Musculoskeletal Care. 2023 Dec;21(4):1578-1591. doi: 10.1002/msc.1835. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
The aims were to: revise the Work Experience Survey-Rheumatic Conditions (WES-RC- UK), a work assessment listing 142 workplace barriers; investigate content validity, reliability, and concurrent validity; update the accompanying WES-RC and WORKWELL Solutions Manuals; and investigate workplace barriers of people with inflammatory arthritis.
Rheumatology therapists, following vocational rehabilitation (VR) training, assessed participants in the WORKWELL VR trial using the WES-RC. Data were extracted from the WES-RC to identify the frequency of workplace barriers, and from trial baseline questionnaires (e.g., Work Limitations Questionnaire-25 (WLQ-25). Barriers reported by ≤5 participants were considered for removal. WES-RC content validity was assessed by linking to the International Classification of Functioning, Health, and Disability Core Set for VR (ICF-VR). Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's α and concurrent validity by correlating the total number of workplace barriers reported with WLQ-25 scores.
WES-RCs were completed with 116 employed participants: 79% women, age 48.72 (SD 9.49) years, and 57% working full-time. The WES-RC was reduced to 121 barriers. Content validity was good, with 73/90 ICF-VR items linked. Cronbach's α = 0.92, that is, suitable for individual use. Concurrent validity was moderate: WLQ-25 (r = 0.40). The three most common barriers were Physical Job Demands (100%: e.g., mobility 99%; hand use 74%), Mental, Time, Energy, Emotional Job Demands (91%, e.g., concentration 47%, remembering 41%); Getting Ready for and Travel to Work (87%, e.g., driving 60%).
The WES-RC (UK) has good content validity, reliability, and concurrent validity. The wide range of barriers emphasises the need for biopsychosocial work rehabilitation.
修订工作经验调查-风湿性疾病(WES-RC-英国),这是一份列出 142 个工作场所障碍的工作评估清单;研究内容效度、信度和同时效度;更新配套的 WES-RC 和 WORKWELL 解决方案手册;并研究炎症性关节炎患者的工作场所障碍。
在接受职业康复(VR)培训后,风湿病治疗师使用 WES-RC 对 WORKWELL VR 试验的参与者进行评估。从 WES-RC 中提取数据以确定工作场所障碍的频率,并从试验基线问卷(例如,工作限制问卷-25(WLQ-25)。报告的障碍少于 5 名参与者的障碍将被考虑删除。WES-RC 的内容效度通过与国际功能、健康和残疾分类核心 VR 集(ICF-VR)相关联来评估。可靠性通过 Cronbach's α 进行评估,同时效度通过报告的工作场所障碍总数与 WLQ-25 评分的相关性进行评估。
116 名在职参与者完成了 WES-RC:79%为女性,年龄 48.72(SD 9.49)岁,57%全职工作。WES-RC 减少到 121 个障碍。内容效度良好,与 90 个 ICF-VR 项目中的 73 个项目相关联。Cronbach's α=0.92,即适合个人使用。同时效度中等:WLQ-25(r=0.40)。最常见的三个障碍是身体工作要求(100%:例如,移动性 99%;手部使用 74%)、心理、时间、能量、情绪工作要求(91%,例如,注意力 47%,记忆力 41%);准备和前往工作(87%,例如,驾驶 60%)。
WES-RC(英国)具有良好的内容效度、信度和同时效度。广泛的障碍强调了进行生物心理社会工作康复的必要性。