Suppr超能文献

三种扁桃体切除技术的比较:冷剥离、单极电烙术和低温等离子射频消融术。

Comparison of Three Tonsillectomy Techniques: Cold Dissection, Monopolar Electrocautery, and Coblation.

作者信息

Kandemir Süheyla, Pamuk Ahmet Erim, Özel Gökçe, Şencan Ziya

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kırıkkale Yüksek İhtisas Hospital, Kırıkkale, Turkey.

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Private Practice, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Mar 29;27(4):e694-e698. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1758715. eCollection 2023 Oct.

Abstract

Tonsillectomy is among the most common otolaryngological surgeries.  To evaluate and compare three tonsillectomy techniques: cold steel dissection (CSD), monopolar electrocautery (MEC), and coblation.  The present study retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent tonsillectomy between January 2014 and January 2016. Postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, analgesic use, surgical duration, time to return to normal activity, and postoperative bleeding status were noted.  The CSD group had less analgesic use and shorter return to normal activity than the MEC group (  = 0.037 and  < 0.001, respectively). The coblation group had lower VAS pain scores than the MEC group only at 1 hour to 4 hours postsurgery (  < 0.016). The postoperative bleeding rate was similar in all groups (  = 0.096).  Cold steel dissection tonsillectomy is associated with less postoperative pain and shorter recovery than MEC. Coblation is better than MEC in terms of postoperative pain at 1 hour to 4 hours only, whereas CSD is associated with less postoperative pain than coblation at 2 days to 7 days.

摘要

扁桃体切除术是最常见的耳鼻喉科手术之一。为了评估和比较三种扁桃体切除技术:冷钢剥离术(CSD)、单极电烙术(MEC)和低温等离子刀切除术。本研究回顾性分析了2014年1月至2016年1月期间接受扁桃体切除术患者的病历。记录术后视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分、镇痛药使用情况、手术时间、恢复正常活动的时间以及术后出血情况。CSD组的镇痛药使用量少于MEC组,恢复正常活动的时间也短于MEC组(分别为P = 0.037和P < 0.001)。低温等离子刀切除术组仅在术后1小时至4小时的VAS疼痛评分低于MEC组(P < 0.016)。所有组的术后出血率相似(P = 0.096)。冷钢剥离扁桃体切除术与MEC相比,术后疼痛更少,恢复时间更短。低温等离子刀切除术仅在术后1小时至4小时的术后疼痛方面优于MEC,而CSD在术后2天至7天的术后疼痛方面少于低温等离子刀切除术。

相似文献

9
Coblation Versus Cold Dissection Tonsillectomy: A Comparative Study.等离子消融术与冷刀扁桃体切除术:一项对比研究。
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Dec;74(Suppl 3):5706-5711. doi: 10.1007/s12070-022-03079-0. Epub 2022 Jan 25.

本文引用的文献

2
Comparison of three tonsillectomy techniques in children.三种儿童扁桃体切除术技术的比较。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Jun;278(6):2011-2015. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06299-8. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
4
Cold Technique in Adult Tonsillectomy Reduces Waste and Cost.成人扁桃体切除术中的低温技术可减少浪费并降低成本。
Ear Nose Throat J. 2021 Sep;100(5_suppl):427S-430S. doi: 10.1177/0145561319882779. Epub 2019 Oct 20.
5
Utilization and trends in surgical instrument use in pediatric adenotonsillectomy.小儿腺样体扁桃体切除术中手术器械的使用情况及趋势
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Sep;100:8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.06.019. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
6
Coblation tonsillectomy: a systematic review and descriptive analysis.低温等离子体扁桃体切除术:系统评价与描述性分析
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Jun;274(6):2637-2647. doi: 10.1007/s00405-017-4529-4. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
7
Hemorrhage after tonsillectomy: does the surgical technique really matter?扁桃体切除术后出血:手术技术真的重要吗?
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2013;75(3):123-32. doi: 10.1159/000342314. Epub 2013 Aug 22.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验