• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双侧与单侧内乳动脉在糖尿病患者中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Bilateral versus single internal mammary artery in diabetic patients: systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK.

Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2023 Nov;31(9):781-794. doi: 10.1177/02184923231209364. Epub 2023 Oct 25.

DOI:10.1177/02184923231209364
PMID:37877191
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Data on bilateral internal mammary artery (BIMA) versus single internal mammary artery (SIMA) on diabetics were analyzed; This is the only meta-analysis, the last 7 years.

METHODS

Medline through PubMed/EMBASE/CINHAL and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; 179 articles were studied; 19 studies deemed suitable and were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

The mortality was 2.41% for BIMA versus 1.71% for SIMA (odds ratio [OR] =  0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.74-1.22). Postoperative reopening for bleeding was higher at 3.75% for BIMA versus 2.91% for SIMA (OR =  1.49; 95% CI: 1.15-1.93). The incidence of MI was 0.87% for BIMA versus 0.83% for SIMA (OR =  0.73; 95% CI: 0.37-1.44). Deep sternal wound infection was 3.02% for BIMA and 1.95% for SIMA (OR =  1.57; 95% CI: 1.26-1.95). When skeletonized, the incidence of DSWI was 2.5% for BIMA versus 2.41% for SIMA. There was a significant difference at 5-year survival favoring the BIMA, 85.15% BIMA versus 80.77% SIMA (OR =  1.79; 95% CI: 1.60-2.01). The 10-year overall survival was 74.04% BIMA versus 61.57% SIMA (OR =  1.79; 95% CI: 1.61-1.98). The 15-year survival was 47.08% for BIMA versus 37.06% for SIMA (OR =  1.69; 95% CI: 1.52-1.88).

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative bleeding was higher in BIMA group. Bilateral internal mammary artery in diabetic patients should be carried out in a skeletonize fashion, to reduce DSWI. There is a survival benefit of using BIMA in diabetics within 5 years of surgery; it remains significant up to 15 years.

摘要

目的

分析糖尿病患者双侧内乳动脉(BIMA)与单根内乳动脉(SIMA)的相关数据;这是最近 7 年唯一的一项荟萃分析。

方法

通过 Medline(PubMed/EMBASE/CINHAL)和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库检索;研究了 179 篇文章,纳入了 19 项符合条件的研究进行分析。

结果

BIMA 组的死亡率为 2.41%,SIMA 组为 1.71%(比值比 [OR] =  0.95;95%置信区间 [CI]:0.74-1.22)。BIMA 组术后因出血而再次开放的发生率为 3.75%,SIMA 组为 2.91%(OR =  1.49;95% CI:1.15-1.93)。BIMA 组心肌梗死的发生率为 0.87%,SIMA 组为 0.83%(OR =  0.73;95% CI:0.37-1.44)。BIMA 组深部胸骨伤口感染的发生率为 3.02%,SIMA 组为 1.95%(OR =  1.57;95% CI:1.26-1.95)。当内乳动脉被骨骼化时,BIMA 组深部胸骨伤口感染的发生率为 2.5%,SIMA 组为 2.41%。BIMA 组 5 年生存率显著高于 SIMA 组,分别为 85.15%和 80.77%(OR =  1.79;95% CI:1.60-2.01)。10 年总生存率分别为 74.04%和 61.57%(OR =  1.79;95% CI:1.61-1.98)。15 年生存率分别为 47.08%和 37.06%(OR =  1.69;95% CI:1.52-1.88)。

结论

BIMA 组术后出血较多。糖尿病患者应采用骨骼化方式进行双侧内乳动脉,以降低深部胸骨伤口感染的发生率。在手术后 5 年内,使用 BIMA 对糖尿病患者有生存获益,这种获益在 15 年内仍然显著。

相似文献

1
Bilateral versus single internal mammary artery in diabetic patients: systematic review and meta-analysis.双侧与单侧内乳动脉在糖尿病患者中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2023 Nov;31(9):781-794. doi: 10.1177/02184923231209364. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
2
Impacts of Skeletonized Bilateral Internal Mammary Artery Bypass Grafting on the Risk of Deep Sternal Wound Infection.骨骼化双侧乳内动脉搭桥术对深部胸骨伤口感染风险的影响。
Int Heart J. 2020 Mar 28;61(2):201-208. doi: 10.1536/ihj.19-311. Epub 2020 Mar 14.
3
Hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass surgery with bilateral or single internal mammary artery grafts.杂交冠状动脉血运重建术与双侧或单根内乳动脉旁路移植术治疗冠心病的比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Apr;151(4):1081-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.10.061. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
4
Bilateral internal mammary artery grafting and risk of sternal wound infection: evidence from observational studies.双侧内乳动脉移植与胸骨伤口感染的风险:来自观察性研究的证据。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Jun;95(6):1938-45. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.12.038. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
5
Short-Term Risk of Bilateral Internal Mammary Artery Grafting in Diabetic Patients.糖尿病患者双侧内乳动脉移植的短期风险。
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021;33(2):382-392. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2020.09.002. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
6
Bilateral internal mammary artery grafting enhances survival in diabetic patients: a 30-year follow-up of propensity score-matched cohorts.双侧内乳动脉移植可提高糖尿病患者的生存率:倾向评分匹配队列的 30 年随访。
Circulation. 2012 Dec 18;126(25):2935-42. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.117606. Epub 2012 Nov 19.
7
Bilateral mammary artery grafting increases postoperative mediastinitis without survival benefit in obese patients.双侧乳内动脉移植术会增加肥胖患者术后纵隔炎的发生率,且对生存率无益处。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Dec;50(6):1188-1195. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw164. Epub 2016 May 26.
8
Coronary Revascularization With Single Versus Bilateral Mammary Arteries: Is It Time to Change?单支与双侧乳内动脉冠状动脉血运重建:是时候改变了吗?
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Aug;106(2):466-472. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.01.089. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
9
Bilateral Versus Single Internal Mammary Artery Use in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Propensity Matched Analysis.冠状动脉旁路移植术中双侧与单侧乳内动脉的应用:一项倾向匹配分析
Heart Lung Circ. 2019 May;28(5):807-813. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2018.03.022. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
10
Propensity-matched analysis of bilateral internal mammary artery vs single internal mammary artery in 7702 cases of isolated coronary artery bypass grafting.7702 例单纯冠状动脉旁路移植术中双侧内乳动脉与单支内乳动脉的倾向性匹配分析。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Oct;44(4):711-7. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt157. Epub 2013 Mar 29.