• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

旅行者中原发性与继发性登革热的临床和实验室参数比较。

Comparison of clinical and laboratory parameters of primary vs secondary dengue fever in travellers.

机构信息

Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Infectious Diseases Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.

出版信息

J Travel Med. 2023 Nov 18;30(7). doi: 10.1093/jtm/taad129.

DOI:10.1093/jtm/taad129
PMID:37877966
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dengue fever (DF), caused by the dengue virus (DENV), is the most common arboviral disease in travellers worldwide. It is hypothesized that compared with primary DF, secondary DF may result in antibody-dependent enhancement of the immune response, resulting in more severe disease. We aimed to compare clinical and laboratory parameters in travellers with primary and secondary DF to determine whether secondary DF is associated with markers of severe disease.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study, which included all patients diagnosed with DF at the Central Virology Laboratory of the Israeli Ministry of Health during 2008-19. Clinical, laboratory and virological data were extracted from laboratory and patient records. A diagnosis of DENV infection was based on a positive nonstructural protein 1 (NS1) test, polymerase chain reaction or serology testing for immunoglobulin M (IgM) and immunoglobulin G (IgG). Primary and secondary infections were classified based on travel history, NS1 result and IgM/IgG ratio. Severe DF was defined according to WHO classification.

RESULTS

We identified 245 DF cases: 210 (86%) primary and 35 (14%) secondary. Whilst fever duration was significantly longer in secondary compared with primary infections (6.4 vs 5.3 days, P = 0.027), mean Aspartate aminotransferase levels were significantly higher in primary compared with secondary cases (146 vs 65 U/L, P < 0.001), and no other clinical or laboratory parameter differed significantly between the groups. Of note, only four patients had severe DF, all had primary infections and none died.

CONCLUSIONS

In a cohort of returning travellers with DF, secondary infection, compared with primary infection, was not associated with a consistent trend towards greater severity of the clinical and laboratory markers examined in this study.

摘要

背景

登革热(DF)是由登革病毒(DENV)引起的,是全球旅行者中最常见的虫媒病毒病。据推测,与原发性 DF 相比,继发性 DF 可能导致免疫反应的抗体依赖性增强,从而导致更严重的疾病。我们旨在比较旅行者中原发性和继发性 DF 的临床和实验室参数,以确定继发性 DF 是否与严重疾病的标志物有关。

方法

我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,该研究包括 2008 年至 2019 年期间在以色列卫生部中央病毒学实验室诊断为 DF 的所有患者。从实验室和患者记录中提取临床、实验室和病毒学数据。DENV 感染的诊断基于非结构蛋白 1(NS1)检测、聚合酶链反应或免疫球蛋白 M(IgM)和免疫球蛋白 G(IgG)的血清学检测阳性。原发性和继发性感染是根据旅行史、NS1 结果和 IgM/IgG 比值进行分类的。严重 DF 根据世界卫生组织的分类进行定义。

结果

我们确定了 245 例 DF 病例:210 例(86%)为原发性,35 例(14%)为继发性。虽然继发性感染的发热持续时间明显长于原发性感染(6.4 天 vs 5.3 天,P=0.027),但原发性感染的天冬氨酸转氨酶水平明显高于继发性感染(146 U/L vs 65 U/L,P<0.001),两组之间没有其他临床或实验室参数有显著差异。值得注意的是,只有 4 例患者患有严重 DF,均为原发性感染,且无人死亡。

结论

在返回旅行者中,与原发性感染相比,继发性感染与本研究中检查的临床和实验室标志物的严重程度增加没有一致趋势。

相似文献

1
Comparison of clinical and laboratory parameters of primary vs secondary dengue fever in travellers.旅行者中原发性与继发性登革热的临床和实验室参数比较。
J Travel Med. 2023 Nov 18;30(7). doi: 10.1093/jtm/taad129.
2
Immunoglobulin G (IgG) to IgM ratio in secondary adult dengue infection using samples from early days of symptoms onset.采用发病早期样本检测 IgG 对 IgM 比值在成人二次感染登革热中的应用。
BMC Infect Dis. 2015 Jul 21;15:276. doi: 10.1186/s12879-015-1022-9.
3
A survey of clinical and laboratory characteristics of dengue fever epidemic from 2014 to 2018 in Guangzhou, China.中国广州2014年至2018年登革热疫情的临床和实验室特征调查。
Ann Palliat Med. 2020 Jan;9(1):70-81. doi: 10.21037/apm.2019.12.11.
4
Clinical features and laboratory findings of dengue fever in German travellers: A single-centre, retrospective analysis.德国旅行者登革热的临床特征和实验室检查结果:一项单中心回顾性分析。
Travel Med Infect Dis. 2016 Jan-Feb;14(1):39-44. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2016.01.007. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
5
Characterization of dengue virus infections in a sample of patients suggests unique clinical, immunological, and virological profiles that impact on the diagnosis of dengue and dengue hemorrhagic fever.对一组患者中的登革热病毒感染进行的特征描述提示了独特的临床、免疫和病毒学特征,这些特征影响登革热和登革出血热的诊断。
J Med Virol. 2016 Oct;88(10):1703-10. doi: 10.1002/jmv.24525. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
6
Assessment of diagnostic and analytic performance of the SD Bioline Dengue Duo test for dengue virus (DENV) infections in an endemic area (Savannakhet province, Lao People's Democratic Republic).在一个流行地区(老挝人民民主共和国沙拉湾省)评估 SD Bioline Dengue Duo 检测用于登革病毒(DENV)感染的诊断和分析性能。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 17;15(3):e0230337. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230337. eCollection 2020.
7
Distinguishing Secondary Dengue Virus Infection From Zika Virus Infection With Previous Dengue by a Combination of 3 Simple Serological Tests.通过三种简单血清学检测联合区分既往登革热基础上的二次登革病毒感染与寨卡病毒感染。
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Nov 13;65(11):1829-1836. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix672.
8
Dengue infection in international travellers visiting Bali, Indonesia.印度尼西亚巴厘岛国际旅行者登革热感染情况。
J Travel Med. 2018 Aug 1;25(1). doi: 10.1093/jtm/tay061.
9
Predominant secondary dengue infection among Vietnamese adults mostly without warning signs and severe disease.越南成年人中以无明显预警症状和无重症为主的主要次要登革热感染。
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Nov;100:316-323. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.08.082. Epub 2020 Sep 5.
10
Dengue NS1-specific antibody responses: isotype distribution and serotyping in patients with Dengue fever and Dengue hemorrhagic fever.登革热NS1特异性抗体反应:登革热和登革出血热患者的抗体类型分布及血清分型
J Med Virol. 2000 Oct;62(2):224-32. doi: 10.1002/1096-9071(200010)62:2<224::aid-jmv14>3.0.co;2-c.

引用本文的文献

1
Latin America's Dengue Outbreak Poses a Global Health Threat.拉丁美洲的登革热疫情对全球健康构成威胁。
Viruses. 2025 Jan 1;17(1):57. doi: 10.3390/v17010057.
2
Fatal dengue virus infection in an unvaccinated traveler.一名未接种疫苗的旅行者感染登革热病毒死亡。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2025 Mar;44(3):747-752. doi: 10.1007/s10096-024-05021-4. Epub 2024 Dec 28.
3
Epidemiology of travel-associated dengue from 2007 to 2022: A GeoSentinel analysis.2007 年至 2022 年旅行相关登革热的流行病学:GeoSentinel 分析。
J Travel Med. 2024 Oct 19;31(7). doi: 10.1093/jtm/taae089.
4
The 2023 Dengue Outbreak in Bangladesh: Exploring the Epidemiology in Hospitalized Patients.2023 年孟加拉登革热疫情:住院患者中的流行病学研究。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2024 Apr 9;110(6):1165-1171. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.23-0806. Print 2024 Jun 5.
5
Dengue severity in travellers: challenges and insights.旅行者中的登革热严重程度:挑战与见解。
J Travel Med. 2023 Dec 28;30(8). doi: 10.1093/jtm/taad146.