Nielsen K K, Qvist N, Jensen K M, Kristensen E S, Krarup T, Dalsgaard J, Pedersen D
Urol Res. 1986;14(4):187-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00441111.
In a prospective study 33 children (aged 6-14 years) consecutively referred for recurrent urinary tract infections (RUTI), underwent intravenous urography (IVU) as well as voiding cystography (VC). Seven children had unilateral and two children had bilateral renal scarring, while ten children had unilateral and six children had bilateral vesico-ureteral reflux (VUR). Following normal IVU VUR was demonstrated in 22% of the ureters, but in all cases of low grade. In abnormal IVU, i.e. renal scarring or dilatation of the ureters, VC showed high grade VUR in 54% of the ureters. Based on these results and the current theories on the significance of patient age and grade of VUR, we conclude that in case of a normal IVU in children with RUTI and age of at least 6 years, there is no reason to supplement the pre-treatment evaluation with VC.
在一项前瞻性研究中,33名连续因复发性尿路感染(RUTI)前来就诊的儿童(年龄6至14岁)接受了静脉肾盂造影(IVU)以及排尿性膀胱造影(VC)检查。7名儿童有单侧肾瘢痕,2名儿童有双侧肾瘢痕,而10名儿童有单侧膀胱输尿管反流(VUR),6名儿童有双侧VUR。静脉肾盂造影正常的情况下,22%的输尿管显示有VUR,但均为低级别。在静脉肾盂造影异常,即存在肾瘢痕或输尿管扩张的情况下,排尿性膀胱造影显示54%的输尿管有高级别VUR。基于这些结果以及目前关于患者年龄和VUR分级意义的理论,我们得出结论,对于年龄至少6岁且静脉肾盂造影正常的复发性尿路感染儿童,没有理由用排尿性膀胱造影来补充治疗前评估。