• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从不同利益相关者的角度进行围手术期结果评估:是否需要重新考虑?

Perioperative outcome assessment from the perspectives of different stakeholders: need for reconsideration?

作者信息

Abbassi Fariba, Walbert Carmen, Kehlet Henrik, Grocott Michael P W, Puhan Milo A, Clavien Pierre-Alain

机构信息

Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Biogen International GmbH, Baar, Switzerland.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2023 Dec;131(6):969-971. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.09.014. Epub 2023 Oct 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.bja.2023.09.014
PMID:37879999
Abstract

Standardised and universal perioperative endpoint reporting are the cornerstone for outcomes assessment, reliable clinical trials, and health services research. The Outcome4medicine initiative recently reported consensus recommendations on how to assess the quality of surgical interventions, proposing a framework for surgical outcome assessment and quality improvement after medical interventions. In the same field, the Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine - Core Outcome Measures for Perioperative and Anaesthetic Care (StEP-COMPAC) group recently proposed standardised and valid measures of mortality and morbidity, derived from a three-stage Delphi process. Here a core group of the Outcome4medicine conference discusses how these two initiatives are aligned and emphasises the importance of standardised outcome assessment by integrating the perspectives of different stakeholders.

摘要

标准化和通用的围手术期终点报告是结果评估、可靠的临床试验以及卫生服务研究的基石。“医学结果4”倡议最近报告了关于如何评估手术干预质量的共识建议,提出了一个医疗干预后手术结果评估和质量改进的框架。在同一领域,围手术期医学标准化终点——围手术期和麻醉护理核心结果指标(StEP - COMPAC)小组最近通过三轮德尔菲法提出了标准化且有效的死亡率和发病率衡量指标。在此,“医学结果4”会议的一个核心小组讨论了这两项倡议如何相互协调,并通过整合不同利益相关者的观点强调了标准化结果评估的重要性。

相似文献

1
Perioperative outcome assessment from the perspectives of different stakeholders: need for reconsideration?从不同利益相关者的角度进行围手术期结果评估:是否需要重新考虑?
Br J Anaesth. 2023 Dec;131(6):969-971. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.09.014. Epub 2023 Oct 23.
2
Core Outcome Measures for Perioperative and Anaesthetic Care (COMPAC): a modified Delphi process to develop a core outcome set for trials in perioperative care and anaesthesia.围手术期和麻醉护理核心结局测量(COMPAC):一个改良的德尔菲法过程,用于开发围手术期护理和麻醉试验的核心结局集。
Br J Anaesth. 2022 Jan;128(1):174-185. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.09.027. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
3
Clinical indicators for reporting the effectiveness of patient quality and safety-related interventions: a protocol of a systematic review and Delphi consensus process as part of the international Standardised Endpoints for Perioperative Medicine initiative (StEP).报告患者质量与安全相关干预措施有效性的临床指标:作为围手术期医学国际标准化终点(StEP)倡议一部分的系统评价和德尔菲共识过程方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 2;8(11):e023427. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023427.
4
Systematic review and consensus definitions for the Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine (StEP) initiative: infection and sepsis.系统评价和共识定义在围手术期医学的标准化终点(StEP)倡议:感染和脓毒症。
Br J Anaesth. 2019 Apr;122(4):500-508. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.01.009. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
5
Systematic reviews and consensus definitions for the Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine (StEP) initiative: mortality, morbidity, and organ failure.围手术期医学标准化终点(StEP)倡议的系统评价与共识定义:死亡率、发病率和器官衰竭。
Br J Anaesth. 2023 Apr;130(4):404-411. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.12.012. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
6
Systematic review and consensus definitions for the Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine initiative: clinical indicators.系统评价和共识定义围手术期医学标准终点倡议:临床指标。
Br J Anaesth. 2019 Aug;123(2):228-237. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.04.041. Epub 2019 May 23.
7
Systematic review and consensus definitions for the Standardized Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine (StEP) initiative: cardiovascular outcomes.系统评价和共识定义标准化围手术期医学(StEP)倡议的标准终点:心血管结局。
Br J Anaesth. 2021 Jan;126(1):56-66. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.09.023. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
8
Systematic review and consensus definitions for the Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine initiative: patient-centred outcomes.系统评价和围手术期医学倡议的标准化结局的共识定义:以患者为中心的结局。
Br J Anaesth. 2019 Nov;123(5):664-670. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.07.020. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
9
Systematic review and consensus definitions for the Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine (StEP) initiative: patient comfort.系统评价和共识定义标准化围手术期医学(StEP)倡议的标准终点:患者舒适度。
Br J Anaesth. 2018 Apr;120(4):705-711. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.12.037. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
10
Systematic review and consensus definitions for the Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine (StEP) initiative: renal endpoints.系统评价和共识定义标准化围手术期医学(StEP)倡议的标准终点:肾脏终点。
Br J Anaesth. 2018 Nov;121(5):1013-1024. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.08.010. Epub 2018 Sep 21.

引用本文的文献

1
PBM and ERAS: mandatory bedfellows.药剂福利管理与加速康复外科:必然的伙伴。
Blood Transfus. 2025 Jan;23(1):9-11. doi: 10.2450/BloodTransfus.876. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
2
A critical approach to research on perioperative pain management.围手术期疼痛管理研究的批判性方法。
Br J Anaesth. 2025 Mar;134(3):621-626. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.11.004. Epub 2024 Nov 28.
3
Outcomes of clinical decision support systems in real-world perioperative care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.临床决策支持系统在现实围手术期护理中的效果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2024 Dec 1;110(12):8057-8072. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001821.
4
Exploring the need for reconsideration of trial design in perioperative outcomes research: a narrative review.探索围手术期结局研究中重新考虑试验设计的必要性:一项叙述性综述
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Feb 29;70:102510. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102510. eCollection 2024 Apr.