Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2023 Oct 25;31(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s13049-023-01122-9.
The presence of in-house attending trauma surgeons has improved efficiency of processes in the treatment of polytrauma patients. However, literature remains equivocal regarding the influence of the presence of in-house attendings on mortality. In our hospital there is a double trauma surgeon on-call system. In this system an in-house trauma surgeon is 24/7 backed up by a second trauma surgeon to assist with urgent surgery or multiple casualties. The aim of this study was to evaluate outcome in severely injured patients in this unique trauma system.
From 2014 to 2021, a prospective population-based cohort consisting of consecutive polytrauma patients aged ≥ 15 years requiring both urgent surgery (≤ 24h) and admission to Intensive Care Unit (ICU) was investigated. Demographics, treatment, outcome parameters and pre- and in-hospital transfer times were analyzed.
Three hundred thirteen patients with a median age of 44 years (71% male), and median Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 33 were included. Mortality rate was 19% (68% due to traumatic brain injury). All patients stayed ≤ 32 min in ED before transport to either CT or OR. Fifty-one percent of patients who needed damage control surgery (DCS) had a more deranged physiology, needed more blood products, were more quickly in OR with shorter time in OR, than patients with early definitive care (EDC). There was no difference in mortality rate between DCS and EDC patients. Fifty-six percent of patients had surgery during off-hours. There was no difference in outcome between patients who had surgery during daytime and during off-hours. Death could possibly have been prevented in 1 exsanguinating patient (1.7%).
In this cohort of severely injured patients in need of urgent surgery and ICU support it was demonstrated that surgical decision making was swift and accurate with low preventable death rates. 24/7 Physical presence of a dedicated trauma team has likely contributed to these good outcomes.
院内主治创伤外科医生的存在提高了多发伤患者治疗过程的效率。然而,文献对于院内主治医生的存在对死亡率的影响仍存在争议。在我们医院,有一个双重创伤外科医生值班系统。在这个系统中,一名院内创伤外科医生 24/7 由第二名创伤外科医生提供支持,以协助紧急手术或处理多名伤员。本研究的目的是评估在这个独特的创伤系统中严重受伤患者的结果。
从 2014 年到 2021 年,对连续的需要紧急手术(≤24 小时)和入住重症监护病房(ICU)的≥15 岁多发伤患者进行了一项前瞻性基于人群的队列研究。分析了人口统计学、治疗、结局参数以及术前和院内转运时间。
共纳入 313 名中位年龄为 44 岁(71%为男性)、损伤严重度评分(ISS)为 33 的患者。死亡率为 19%(68%死于创伤性脑损伤)。所有患者在急诊科停留时间均≤32 分钟,然后转运至 CT 或手术室。需要损伤控制性手术(DCS)的患者中有 51%的生理状况更不稳定,需要更多的血液制品,更快进入手术室,在手术室的停留时间更短,与接受早期确定性治疗(EDC)的患者相比。DCS 和 EDC 患者的死亡率无差异。56%的患者在非工作时间接受手术。在白天和非工作时间接受手术的患者之间,结果无差异。可能有 1 例出血性休克患者(1.7%)的死亡是可以预防的。
在本队列中,需要紧急手术和 ICU 支持的严重受伤患者中,手术决策迅速准确,可预防的死亡率较低。24/7 有专门创伤团队的实际存在可能促成了这些良好的结局。