• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

模型预测终末期肝病 3.0 对韩国肝癌患者和非肝癌患者之间差异的影响。

The Effect of Model for End-Stage Liver Disease 3.0 on Disparities between Patients with and without Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Korea.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Surgery, Institute for Transplantation, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Yonsei Med J. 2023 Nov;64(11):647-657. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2023.0163.

DOI:10.3349/ymj.2023.0163
PMID:37880845
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10613763/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) 3.0 has recently been suggested for determining liver allocation. We aimed to apply MELD 3.0 to a Korean population and to discover differences between patients with and without hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study is a retrospective study of 2203 patients diagnosed with liver cirrhosis at Severance Hospital between 2016-2022. Harrell's concordance index was used to validate the ability of MELD scores to predict 90-day survival.

RESULTS

During a mean follow-up of 12.9 months, 90-day survival was 61.9% in all patients, 50.4% in the HCC patients, and 74.8% in the non-HCC patients. Within the HCC patients, the concordance index for patients on the waitlist was 0.653 using MELD, which increased to 0.753 using MELD 3.0. Among waitlisted patients, the 90-day survival of HCC patients was worse than that of non-HCC patients with MELD scores of 31-37 only (69.7% vs. 30.0%, =0.001). Applying MELD 3.0, the 90-day survival of HCC patients was worse than that of non-HCC patients across a wider range of MELD 3.0 scores, compared to MELD, with MELD 3.0 scores of 21-30 and 31-37 (82.0% vs. 72.5% and 72.3% vs. 24.3%, =0.02 and <0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

MELD 3.0 predicted 90-day survival of the HCC patients more accurately than original MELD score; however, the disparity between HCC and non-HCC patients increased, particularly in patients with MELD scores of 21-30. Therefore, a novel exception score is needed or the current exception score system should be modified.

摘要

目的

终末期肝病模型(MELD)3.0 最近被建议用于确定肝脏分配。我们旨在将 MELD 3.0 应用于韩国人群,并发现患有和不患有肝细胞癌(HCC)的患者之间的差异。

材料和方法

本研究是对 2016 年至 2022 年期间在 Severance 医院诊断为肝硬化的 2203 名患者进行的回顾性研究。哈雷尔一致性指数用于验证 MELD 评分预测 90 天生存率的能力。

结果

在平均 12.9 个月的随访中,所有患者的 90 天生存率为 61.9%,HCC 患者为 50.4%,非 HCC 患者为 74.8%。在 HCC 患者中,使用 MELD 时候补名单上患者的一致性指数为 0.653,使用 MELD 3.0 时增加到 0.753。在候补名单上的患者中,只有 MELD 评分在 31-37 分的 HCC 患者的 90 天生存率比非 HCC 患者差(69.7%比 30.0%,=0.001)。应用 MELD 3.0 时,与 MELD 相比,HCC 患者的 90 天生存率在更广泛的 MELD 3.0 评分范围内比非 HCC 患者差,MELD 3.0 评分在 21-30 分和 31-37 分(82.0%比 72.5%和 72.3%比 24.3%,=0.02 和<0.001)。

结论

MELD 3.0 比原始 MELD 评分更准确地预测 HCC 患者的 90 天生存率;然而,HCC 和非 HCC 患者之间的差距增加,特别是在 MELD 评分在 21-30 分的患者中。因此,需要一个新的例外评分,或者应该修改当前的例外评分系统。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d896/10613763/e92eb5fd1029/ymj-64-647-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d896/10613763/77bea56e919f/ymj-64-647-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d896/10613763/21b11171890a/ymj-64-647-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d896/10613763/e92eb5fd1029/ymj-64-647-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d896/10613763/77bea56e919f/ymj-64-647-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d896/10613763/21b11171890a/ymj-64-647-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d896/10613763/e92eb5fd1029/ymj-64-647-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
The Effect of Model for End-Stage Liver Disease 3.0 on Disparities between Patients with and without Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Korea.模型预测终末期肝病 3.0 对韩国肝癌患者和非肝癌患者之间差异的影响。
Yonsei Med J. 2023 Nov;64(11):647-657. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2023.0163.
2
Increasing disparity in waitlist mortality rates with increased model for end-stage liver disease scores for candidates with hepatocellular carcinoma versus candidates without hepatocellular carcinoma.肝癌患者与非肝癌患者的终末期肝病模型评分增加导致等待名单死亡率差异增大。
Liver Transpl. 2012 Apr;18(4):434-43. doi: 10.1002/lt.23394.
3
MELDEQ : An alternative Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.MELDEQ:一种用于肝细胞癌患者的终末期肝病评分替代模型。
Liver Transpl. 2015 May;21(5):612-22. doi: 10.1002/lt.24098. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
4
Development of a Korean Liver Allocation System using Model for End Stage Liver Disease Scores: A Nationwide, Multicenter study.应用终末期肝脏疾病评分模型开发韩国肝脏分配系统:一项全国性、多中心研究。
Sci Rep. 2019 May 16;9(1):7495. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43965-2.
5
A method for establishing allocation equity among patients with and without hepatocellular carcinoma on a common liver transplant waiting list.一种在共同的肝移植等待名单上为肝癌患者和非肝癌患者分配公平性的方法。
J Hepatol. 2014 Feb;60(2):290-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.10.010. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
6
Lower rates of receiving model for end-stage liver disease exception and longer time to transplant among nonalcoholic steatohepatitis hepatocellular carcinoma.非酒精性脂肪性肝炎肝细胞癌患者接受终末期肝病模型例外情况的比例较低,且移植等待时间较长。
Liver Transpl. 2016 Oct;22(10):1356-66. doi: 10.1002/lt.24507.
7
Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: impact of the MELD allocation system and predictors of survival.肝细胞癌的肝移植:终末期肝病模型(MELD)分配系统的影响及生存预测因素
Gastroenterology. 2008 May;134(5):1342-51. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.02.013. Epub 2008 Feb 13.
8
Liver transplantation in the MELD era--analysis of the OPTN/UNOS registry.终末期肝病模型(MELD)时代的肝移植——器官获取与移植网络(OPTN)/美国器官共享联合网络(UNOS)登记处分析
Clin Transpl. 2012:41-65.
9
Proposal of a novel MELD exception point system for hepatocellular carcinoma based on tumor characteristics and dynamics.基于肿瘤特征和动态的新型肝癌 MELD 例外评分系统的提出。
J Hepatol. 2017 Feb;66(2):374-381. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.10.008. Epub 2016 Oct 15.
10
Improved outcome of adult recipients with a high model for end-stage liver disease score and a small-for-size graft.终末期肝病模型评分高且移植物过小的成年受者的预后改善。
Liver Transpl. 2009 May;15(5):496-503. doi: 10.1002/lt.21606.

引用本文的文献

1
The Development and Appraisal of MELD 3.0 in Liver Diseases: Good Things Never Come Easy.终末期肝病模型(MELD)3.0在肝脏疾病中的发展与评估:好事多磨。
J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2025 Jan 28;13(1):62-68. doi: 10.14218/JCTH.2024.00303. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
2
Comparison between Nivolumab and Regorafenib as Second-line Systemic Therapies after Sorafenib Failure in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.纳武利尤单抗与regorafenib 作为索拉非尼治疗失败后肝癌二线系统治疗的比较。
Yonsei Med J. 2024 Jul;65(7):371-379. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2023.0263.

本文引用的文献

1
Deceased donor liver transplantation under the Korean model for end-stage liver disease score-based liver allocation system: 2-year allocation results at a high-volume transplantation center.基于韩国终末期肝病评分的肝脏分配系统下的尸体供肝肝移植:一家高容量移植中心的2年分配结果
Korean J Transplant. 2019 Dec 31;33(4):112-117. doi: 10.4285/jkstn.2019.33.4.112.
2
"Beyond MELD" - Emerging strategies and technologies for improving mortality prediction, organ allocation and outcomes in liver transplantation.“超越 MELD”-改善肝移植死亡率预测、器官分配和结局的新兴策略和技术。
J Hepatol. 2022 Jun;76(6):1318-1329. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.03.003.
3
Proposing a Sex-Adjusted Sodium-Adjusted MELD Score for Liver Transplant Allocation.
提出用于肝移植分配的性别校正钠校正终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分
JAMA Surg. 2022 Jul 1;157(7):618-626. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.1548.
4
Early Impact of MMaT-3 Policy on Liver Transplant Waitlist Outcomes for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.MMaT-3政策对肝细胞癌肝移植等待名单结果的早期影响
Transplant Direct. 2022 Apr 12;8(5):e1313. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001313. eCollection 2022 May.
5
Current status and outcome of liver transplantation in South Korea.韩国肝移植的现状与结果
Clin Mol Hepatol. 2022 Jan;28(1):117-119. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2021.0381. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
6
From Child-Pugh to MELD score and beyond: Taking a walk down memory lane.从Child-Pugh评分到终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分及其他:回顾往昔。
Ann Hepatol. 2022 Jan-Feb;27(1):100535. doi: 10.1016/j.aohep.2021.100535. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
7
MELD 3.0: The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Updated for the Modern Era.MELD 3.0:适应新时代的终末期肝病模型。
Gastroenterology. 2021 Dec;161(6):1887-1895.e4. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.08.050. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
8
Outcomes after liver transplantation in Korea: Incidence and risk factors from Korean transplantation registry.韩国肝移植的结局:韩国移植登记处的发生率和危险因素。
Clin Mol Hepatol. 2021 Jul;27(3):451-462. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2020.0292. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
9
[Current Status of Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation for Alcoholic Liver Disease in Korea in MELD Era].[韩国终末期肝病模型(MELD)时代酒精性肝病尸体供肝移植的现状]
Korean J Gastroenterol. 2021 Jan 25;77(1):4-11. doi: 10.4166/kjg.2020.167.
10
Child-Pugh, MELD, MELD-Na, and ALBI scores: which liver function models best predicts prognosis for HCC patient with ascites?Child-Pugh、MELD、MELD-Na 和 ALBI 评分:哪种肝功能模型最能预测腹水 HCC 患者的预后?
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2020 Aug;55(8):951-957. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2020.1788139. Epub 2020 Jul 23.