Aclan Roslyn, George Stacey, Laver Kate
College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
JMIR Aging. 2023 Oct 26;6:e49500. doi: 10.2196/49500.
Age-friendly environments in homes and communities play an important role in optimizing the health and well-being of society. Older people have strong preferences for remaining at home as they age. Home environment assessment tools that enable older people to assess their homes and prepare for aging in place may be beneficial.
This study aims to establish the validity of a digital self-assessment tool by assessing it against the current gold standard, an occupational therapy home assessment.
A cohort of adults aged ≥60 years living in metropolitan Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, assessed their homes using a digital self-assessment tool with 89 questions simultaneously with an occupational therapist. Adults who were living within their homes and did not have significant levels of disabilities were recruited. Cohen κ and Gwet AC were used to assess validity.
A total of 61 participants (age: mean 71.2, SD 7.03 years) self-assessed their own homes using the digital self-assessment tool. The overall levels of agreement were high, supporting the validity of the tool in identifying potential hazards. Lower levels of agreement were found in the following domains: steps (77% agreement, Gwet AC=0.56), toilets (56% agreement, κ=0.10), bathrooms (64% agreement, κ=0.46), and backyards (55% agreement, κ=0.24).
Older people were able to self-assess their homes using a digital self-assessment tool. Digital health tools enable older people to start thinking about their future housing needs. Innovative tools that can identify problems and generate solutions may improve the age-friendliness of the home environment.
家庭和社区中的适老化环境在优化社会健康和福祉方面发挥着重要作用。随着年龄增长,老年人强烈倾向于居家养老。能够让老年人评估自己的家并为就地养老做好准备的家庭环境评估工具可能会有所帮助。
本研究旨在通过将一种数字自我评估工具与当前的金标准——职业疗法家庭评估进行对比,来确定该工具的有效性。
一组年龄≥60岁、居住在澳大利亚南澳大利亚州阿德莱德市的成年人,在职业治疗师的同时参与下,使用一个包含89个问题的数字自我评估工具对自己的家进行评估。招募居住在自己家中且无明显残疾的成年人。使用Cohen κ系数和Gwet AC系数评估有效性。
共有61名参与者(年龄:平均71.2岁,标准差7.03岁)使用数字自我评估工具对自己的家进行了自我评估。总体一致性水平较高,支持该工具在识别潜在危险方面的有效性。在以下领域发现了较低的一致性水平:台阶(一致性为77%,Gwet AC = 0.56)、厕所(一致性为56%,κ = 0.10)、浴室(一致性为64%,κ = 0.46)和后院(一致性为55%,κ = 0.24)。
老年人能够使用数字自我评估工具对自己的家进行自我评估。数字健康工具能让老年人开始思考他们未来的住房需求。能够识别问题并生成解决方案的创新工具可能会提高家庭环境的适老化程度。