Liu Qingyan, Li Rong, Li Lingling, Wang Gaokun, Ji Shiyu, Zheng Xuan, Jia Xiaodong, Tao Haitao, Hu Yi
Department of Oncology, Fifth Medical Center of the Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, ChinaMedical School of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Beijing, China.
Department of Health Medicine, Second Medical Center of the Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2023 Oct 24;15:17588359231206274. doi: 10.1177/17588359231206274. eCollection 2023.
The efficacy of anti-programmed cell death (PD)-1 monotherapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) is limited, and combination therapy with lenvatinib and pembrolizumab has shown promising results. However, comparative studies between immune monotherapies and combination therapies are lacking.
To investigate the efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1 monotherapy (PD-1) and anti-PD-1 plus lenvatinib (PD-1 + ) in patients with aHCC to guide clinical treatment decisions.
A retrospective study was conducted on a cohort of patients with aHCC who received either PD-1 monotherapy or PD-1 + combination therapy between January 2018 and January 2020.
The study retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 94 eligible patients with aHCC, with 39 in the PD-1 group and 55 in the PD-1 + group. The efficacy outcomes, including objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety, were assessed.
With a median follow-up of 30.1 months, the PD-1 + group demonstrated a significantly higher ORR (32.7% 10.3%, = 0.013), better DCR (80.0% 53.8%, = 0.012), longer median PFS (10.6 4.4 months, < 0.001) and longer median OS (18.4 8.5 months, = 0.013) than PD-1 group. For the responders, the efficacy of the two groups was durable (DOR was 11.6 3.5 months, = 0.009). Subgroup analyses based on prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment and the presence or absence of macrovascular tumor thrombosis or extrahepatic metastases favored the PD-1 + group. The combination therapy was a good predictor of PFS and OS in multivariate analysis. Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were more common in PD-1 + group, with higher incidences of hypertension and hand-foot skin reactions.
PD-1 monotherapy and PD-1 plus lenvatinib combination therapy were well-tolerated in patients with aHCC. PD-1 + showed significantly better survival benefits than PD-1 monotherapy.
抗程序性细胞死亡(PD)-1单药疗法在晚期肝细胞癌(aHCC)中的疗效有限,而乐伐替尼与帕博利珠单抗联合治疗已显示出有前景的结果。然而,免疫单药疗法与联合疗法之间的比较研究尚缺乏。
探讨抗PD-1单药疗法(PD-1)和抗PD-1联合乐伐替尼(PD-1 + )在aHCC患者中的疗效和安全性,以指导临床治疗决策。
对2018年1月至2020年1月期间接受PD-1单药疗法或PD-1 + 联合疗法的aHCC患者队列进行回顾性研究。
该研究回顾性分析了94例符合条件的aHCC患者的病历,其中PD-1组39例,PD-1 + 组55例。评估疗效结果,包括客观缓解率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)、缓解持续时间(DOR)、无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和安全性。
中位随访30.1个月,PD-1 + 组的ORR显著更高(32.7% 对10.3%,P = 0.013),DCR更好(80.0% 对53.8%,P = 0.012),中位PFS更长(10.6对4.4个月,P < 0.001),中位OS更长(18.4对8.5个月,P = 0.013)。对于缓解者,两组疗效持久(DOR为11.6对3.5个月,P = 0.009)。基于既往酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)治疗以及是否存在大血管肿瘤血栓形成或肝外转移的亚组分析有利于PD-1 + 组。在多变量分析中,联合疗法是PFS和OS的良好预测指标。3/4级治疗相关不良事件在PD-1 + 组中更常见,高血压和手足皮肤反应的发生率更高。
PD-1单药疗法和PD-1联合乐伐替尼联合疗法在aHCC患者中耐受性良好。PD-1 + 显示出比PD-1单药疗法显著更好的生存获益。