LeClair Renée J, Binks Andrew P, Gambala Cecilia T, Brenner Judith M, Willey Joanne M
Department of Basic Science Education, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA USA.
Office of Academic Affairs, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA USA.
Med Sci Educ. 2023 Sep 18;33(5):1197-1204. doi: 10.1007/s40670-023-01878-w. eCollection 2023 Oct.
Given the significance of the US Medical Licensing Exam (USMLE) Step 1 score moving from a 3-digit value to pass/fail, the authors investigated the impact of the change on students' anxiety, approach to learning, and curiosity.
Two cohorts of pre-clerkship medical students at three medical schools completed a composite of four instruments: the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, the revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire, the Interest/Deprivation Type Epistemic Curiosity Scale, and the Short Grit Scale prior to taking the last 3-digit scored Step 1 in 2021 or taking the first pass/fail scored Step 1 in 2022. Responses of 3-digit and pass/fail exam takers were compared (Mann-Whitney ) and multiple regression path analysis was performed to determine the factors that significantly impacted learning strategies.
There was no difference between 3-digit ( = 86) and pass/fail exam takers ( = 154) in anxiety (STA-I scores, 50 vs. 49, = 0.85), shallow learning strategies (22 vs. 23, = 0.84), or interest curiosity scores (median scores 15 vs. 15, = 0.07). However, pass/fail exam takers had lower deprivation curiosity scores (median 12 vs. 11, = 0.03) and showed a decline in deep learning strategies (30 vs. 27, = 0.0012). Path analysis indicated the decline in deep learning strategies was due to the change in exam scoring ( = - 2.0428, < 0.05).
Counter to the stated hypothesis and intentions, the initial impact of the change to pass/fail grading for USMLE Step 1 failed to reduce learner anxiety, and reduced curiosity and deep learning strategies.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-023-01878-w.
鉴于美国医师执照考试(USMLE)第一步考试成绩从三位数评分改为及格/不及格的重要性,作者调查了这一变化对学生焦虑、学习方法和好奇心的影响。
三所医学院的两批临床前医学生在2021年参加最后一次三位数评分的第一步考试或2022年参加第一次及格/不及格评分的第一步考试之前,完成了四项工具的综合测评:状态-特质焦虑量表、修订后的双因素学习过程问卷、兴趣/剥夺型认知好奇心量表和简短毅力量表。比较了三位数评分和及格/不及格评分考生的回答(曼-惠特尼检验),并进行了多元回归路径分析,以确定对学习策略有显著影响的因素。
三位数评分考生(n = 86)和及格/不及格评分考生(n = 154)在焦虑(状态焦虑量表-I得分,50对49,P = 0.85)、浅层学习策略(22对23,P = 0.84)或兴趣好奇心得分(中位数得分15对15,P = 0.07)方面没有差异。然而,及格/不及格评分考生的剥夺好奇心得分较低(中位数12对11,P = 0.03),并且深度学习策略有所下降(30对27,P = 0.0012)。路径分析表明,深度学习策略的下降是由于考试评分的变化(β = - 2.0428,P < 0.05)。
与既定假设和意图相反,USMLE第一步考试改为及格/不及格评分的最初影响未能减轻学习者的焦虑,反而降低了好奇心和深度学习策略。
在线版本包含可在10.1007/s406***-023-01878-w获取的补充材料。