• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美罗培南持续输注与间歇输注治疗医院获得性肺炎的回顾性单中心研究

Extended Versus Intermittent Meropenem Infusion in the Treatment of Nosocomial Pneumonia: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.

作者信息

Hyun Dong-Gon, Seo Jarim, Lee Su Yeon, Ahn Jee Hwan, Hong Sang-Bum, Lim Chae-Man, Koh Younsuck, Huh Jin Won

机构信息

Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Asan Medical Centre, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Republic of Korea.

Department of Pharmacy, Asan Medical Centre, Seoul 05505, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Oct 15;12(10):1542. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12101542.

DOI:10.3390/antibiotics12101542
PMID:37887243
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10604670/
Abstract

The efficacy of extended meropenem infusions in patients with nosocomial pneumonia is not well defined. Therefore, we compared the clinical outcomes of extended versus intermittent meropenem infusions in the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia. We performed a retrospective analysis of extended versus intermittent meropenem infusions in adult patients who had been treated for nosocomial pneumonia at a medical ICU between 1 May 2018 and 30 April 2020. The primary outcome was mortality at 14 days. Overall, 64 patients who underwent an extended infusion and 97 with an intermittent infusion were included in this study. At 14 days, 10 (15.6%) patients in the extended group and 22 (22.7%) in the intermittent group had died (adjusted hazard ratio (HR), 0.55; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.23-1.31; = 0.174). In the subgroup analysis, significant differences in mortality at day 14 were observed in patients following empirical treatment with meropenem (adjusted HR, 0.17; 95% CI: 0.03-0.96; = 0.045) and in Gram-negative pathogens identified by blood or sputum cultures (adjusted HR, 0.01; 95% CI: 0.01-0.83; = 0.033). Extended infusion of meropenem compared with intermittent infusion as a treatment option for nosocomial pneumonia may have a potential advantage in specific populations.

摘要

美罗培南延长输注对医院获得性肺炎患者的疗效尚不明确。因此,我们比较了美罗培南延长输注与间歇输注治疗医院获得性肺炎的临床结局。我们对2018年5月1日至2020年4月30日期间在某医疗重症监护病房接受医院获得性肺炎治疗的成年患者中,美罗培南延长输注与间歇输注进行了回顾性分析。主要结局是14天的死亡率。总体而言,本研究纳入了64例接受延长输注的患者和97例接受间歇输注的患者。14天时,延长输注组有10例(15.6%)患者死亡,间歇输注组有22例(22.7%)患者死亡(校正风险比(HR)为0.55;95%置信区间(CI):0.23 - 1.31;P = 0.174)。在亚组分析中,美罗培南经验性治疗后的患者(校正HR,0.17;95% CI:0.03 - 0.96;P = 0.045)以及血培养或痰培养鉴定出的革兰阴性病原体患者(校正HR,0.01;95% CI:0.01 - 0.83;P = 0.033)在14天死亡率方面存在显著差异。作为医院获得性肺炎的一种治疗选择,与间歇输注相比,美罗培南延长输注可能在特定人群中具有潜在优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42ee/10604670/51bbf408655d/antibiotics-12-01542-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42ee/10604670/be4b18ea9ca2/antibiotics-12-01542-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42ee/10604670/4d74da3a9842/antibiotics-12-01542-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42ee/10604670/51bbf408655d/antibiotics-12-01542-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42ee/10604670/be4b18ea9ca2/antibiotics-12-01542-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42ee/10604670/4d74da3a9842/antibiotics-12-01542-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42ee/10604670/51bbf408655d/antibiotics-12-01542-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Extended Versus Intermittent Meropenem Infusion in the Treatment of Nosocomial Pneumonia: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.美罗培南持续输注与间歇输注治疗医院获得性肺炎的回顾性单中心研究
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Oct 15;12(10):1542. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12101542.
2
Cefiderocol versus high-dose, extended-infusion meropenem for the treatment of Gram-negative nosocomial pneumonia (APEKS-NP): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial.头孢地尔与大剂量延长输注美罗培南治疗革兰阴性菌医院获得性肺炎(APEKS-NP):一项随机、双盲、3期、非劣效性试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;21(2):213-225. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30731-3. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
3
Ceftazidime-avibactam versus meropenem in nosocomial pneumonia, including ventilator-associated pneumonia (REPROVE): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 non-inferiority trial.头孢他啶-阿维巴坦与美罗培南治疗医院获得性肺炎,包括呼吸机相关性肺炎(REPROVE):一项随机、双盲、III 期非劣效性试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Mar;18(3):285-295. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30747-8. Epub 2017 Dec 16.
4
Meropenem by continuous versus intermittent infusion in ventilator-associated pneumonia due to gram-negative bacilli.美罗培南持续输注与间歇输注治疗革兰阴性杆菌所致呼吸机相关性肺炎的疗效比较
Ann Pharmacother. 2006 Feb;40(2):219-23. doi: 10.1345/aph.1G467. Epub 2006 Jan 31.
5
Evaluation of Meropenem Extended Versus Intermittent Infusion Dosing Protocol in Critically Ill Patients.评价美罗培南持续输注与间断输注给药方案在危重症患者中的应用。
J Intensive Care Med. 2020 Aug;35(8):763-771. doi: 10.1177/0885066618784264. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
6
Effect of extended infusion of meropenem and nebulized amikacin on Gram-negative multidrug-resistant ventilator-associated pneumonia.美罗培南延长输注联合雾化阿米卡星对革兰阴性多重耐药呼吸机相关性肺炎的影响
Saudi J Anaesth. 2018 Jan-Mar;12(1):89-94. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_148_17.
7
Ceftolozane-tazobactam versus meropenem for treatment of nosocomial pneumonia (ASPECT-NP): a randomised, controlled, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial.头孢洛扎他唑巴坦与美罗培南治疗医院获得性肺炎(ASPECT-NP):一项随机、对照、双盲、3 期、非劣效性试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 Dec;19(12):1299-1311. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30403-7. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
8
[Comparison of 3-hour and 30-minute infusion regimens for meropenem in patients with hospital acquired pneumonia in intensive care unit: a randomized controlled clinical trial].[重症监护病房医院获得性肺炎患者美罗培南3小时与30分钟输注方案的比较:一项随机对照临床试验]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2014 Sep;26(9):644-9. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2014.09.008.
9
Comparison of clinical cure rates in adults with ventilator-associated pneumonia treated with intravenous ceftazidime administered by continuous or intermittent infusion: a retrospective, nonrandomized, open-label, historical chart review.持续输注与间歇输注静脉用头孢他啶治疗成人呼吸机相关性肺炎的临床治愈率比较:一项回顾性、非随机、开放标签、历史病历回顾研究。
Clin Ther. 2007 Nov;29(11):2433-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.11.003.
10
Extended infusion versus intermittent infusion of imipenem in the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia.亚胺培南持续输注与间歇输注治疗呼吸机相关性肺炎的对比研究
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2017 Sep 6;11:2677-2682. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S143021. eCollection 2017.

本文引用的文献

1
Continuous vs Intermittent Meropenem Administration in Critically Ill Patients With Sepsis: The MERCY Randomized Clinical Trial.连续性与间歇性美罗培南给药在脓毒症危重症患者中的比较:MERCY 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2023 Jul 11;330(2):141-151. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.10598.
2
Evaluation of Empirical Dosing Regimens for Meropenem in Intensive Care Unit Patients Using Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Target Attainment Analysis.使用群体药代动力学建模和目标达成分析评估 ICU 患者美罗培南的经验性给药方案。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2023 Jan 24;67(1):e0131222. doi: 10.1128/aac.01312-22. Epub 2023 Jan 9.
3
Why We May Need Higher Doses of Beta-Lactam Antibiotics: Introducing the 'Maximum Tolerable Dose'.
为何我们可能需要更高剂量的β-内酰胺类抗生素:引入“最大耐受剂量”
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Jul 4;11(7):889. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11070889.
4
External Evaluation of Population Pharmacokinetic Models to Inform Precision Dosing of Meropenem in Critically Ill Patients.用于指导重症患者美罗培南精准给药的群体药代动力学模型的外部评估。
Front Pharmacol. 2022 May 18;13:838205. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.838205. eCollection 2022.
5
Association of , ,   and β-Lactamase Genes with Resistance to Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Ceftolozane-Tazobactam in Multidrug-Resistant .多药耐药菌中 blaKPC、blaNDM、blaIMP 和 blaVIM 与对头孢他啶-阿维巴坦及头孢洛扎坦-他唑巴坦耐药的相关性
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Jan 19;11(2):130. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11020130.
6
Investigation of pharmacokinetic and clinical outcomes of various meropenem regimens in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia and augmented renal clearance.不同美罗培南给药方案在呼吸机相关性肺炎合并肾脏清除率增加患者中的药代动力学及临床结局研究。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 May;78(5):823-829. doi: 10.1007/s00228-022-03291-5. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
7
New Antibiotics for Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia and Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia.用于医院获得性肺炎和呼吸机相关性肺炎的新型抗生素
Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2022 Apr;43(2):280-294. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1740605. Epub 2022 Jan 27.
8
Penetration of Antibacterial Agents into Pulmonary Epithelial Lining Fluid: An Update.抗菌药物向肺部上皮衬液中的渗透:更新。
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2022 Jan;61(1):17-46. doi: 10.1007/s40262-021-01061-7. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
9
Target Site Pharmacokinetics of Meropenem: Measurement in Human Explanted Lung Tissue by Bronchoalveolar Lavage, Microdialysis, and Homogenized Lung Tissue.美罗培南的靶位药代动力学:支气管肺泡灌洗、微透析和肺组织匀浆在人离体肺组织中的测量。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2021 Nov 17;65(12):e0156421. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01564-21. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
10
Optimizing Antimicrobial Drug Dosing in Critically Ill Patients.优化重症患者的抗菌药物给药方案
Microorganisms. 2021 Jun 28;9(7):1401. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9071401.