• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对与应用于卡尔加里医院入院患者的STOPP/START及美国老年医学会Beers标准相关的死亡率和再入院率的多年回顾性分析。

Multi-Year Retrospective Analysis of Mortality and Readmissions Correlated with STOPP/START and the American Geriatric Society Beers Criteria Applied to Calgary Hospital Admissions.

作者信息

Thomas Roger E, Azzopardi Robert, Asad Mohammad, Tran Dactin

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.

Oracle Canada, Mississauga, ON L5R 4H1, Canada.

出版信息

Geriatrics (Basel). 2023 Oct 9;8(5):100. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics8050100.

DOI:10.3390/geriatrics8050100
PMID:37887973
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10606166/
Abstract

The goals of this retrospective cohort study of 129,443 persons admitted to Calgary acute care hospitals from 2013 to 2021 were to ascertain correlations of "potentially inappropriate medications" (PIMs), "potential prescribing omissions" (PPOs), and other risk factors with readmissions and mortality. : Processing and analysis codes were built in Oracle Database 19c (PL/SQL), R, and Excel. The percentage of patients dying during their hospital stay rose from 3.03% during the first admission to 7.2% during the sixth admission. The percentage of patients dying within 6 months of discharge rose from 9.4% after the first admission to 24.9% after the sixth admission. Odds ratios were adjusted for age, gender, and comorbidities, and for readmission, they were the post-admission number of medications (1.16; 1.12-1.12), STOPP PIMs (1.16; 1.15-1.16), AGS Beers PIMs (1.11; 1.11-1.11), and START omissions not corrected with a prescription (1.39; 1.35-1.42). The odds ratios for readmissions for the second to thirty-ninth admission were consistently higher if START PPOs were not corrected for the second (1.41; 1.36-1.46), third (1.41;1.35-1.48), fourth (1.35; 1.28-1.44), fifth (1.38; 1.28-1.49), sixth (1.47; 1.34-1.62), and seventh admission to thirty-ninth admission (1.23; 1.14-1.34). The odds ratios for mortality were post-admission number of medications (1.04; 1.04-1.05), STOPP PIMs (0.99; 0.96-1.00), AGS Beers PIMs (1.08; 1.07-1.08), and START omissions not corrected with a prescription (1.56; 1.50-1.63). START omissions for all admissions corrected with a prescription by a hospital physician correlated with a dramatic reduction in mortality (0.51; 0.49-0.53) within six months of discharge. This was also true for the second (0.52; 0.50-0.55), fourth (0.56; 0.52-0.61), fifth (0.63; 0.57-0.68), sixth (0.68; 0.61-0.76), and seventh admission to thirty-ninth admission (0.71; 0.65-0.78). "Potential prescribing omissions" (PPOs) consisted mostly of needed cardiac medications. These omissions occurred before the first admission of this cohort, and many persisted through their readmissions and discharges. Therefore, these omissions should be corrected in the community before admission by family physicians, in the hospital by hospital physicians, and if they continue after discharge by teams of family physicians, pharmacists, and nurses. These community teams should also meet with patients and focus on patients' understanding of their illnesses, medications, PPOs, and ability for self-care.

摘要

这项回顾性队列研究对2013年至2021年期间入住卡尔加里急症护理医院的129443人进行,其目的是确定“潜在不适当用药”(PIMs)、“潜在处方遗漏”(PPOs)及其他风险因素与再入院和死亡率之间的相关性。处理和分析代码是在Oracle数据库19c(PL/SQL)、R和Excel中构建的。住院期间死亡患者的比例从首次入院时的3.03%升至第六次入院时的7.2%。出院后6个月内死亡患者的比例从首次入院后的9.4%升至第六次入院后的24.9%。对年龄、性别和合并症进行了比值比调整,对于再入院情况,调整后的比值比涉及入院后用药数量(1.16;1.12 - 1.12)、STOPP PIMs(1.16;1.15 - 1.16)、AGS Beers PIMs(1.11;1.11 - 1.11)以及未通过处方纠正的START遗漏(1.39;1.35 - 1.42)。如果第二次(1.41;1.36 - 1.46)、第三次(1.41;1.35 - 1.48)、第四次(1.35;1.28 - 1.44)、第五次(1.38;1.28 - 1.49)、第六次(1.47;1.34 - 1.62)以及第七次至第三十九次入院时未纠正START PPOs,那么第二次至第三十九次入院再入院的比值比始终较高(1.23;1.14 - 1.34)。死亡率的比值比涉及入院后用药数量(1.04;1.04 - 1.05)、STOPP PIMs(0.99;0.96 - 1.00)、AGS Beers PIMs(1.08;1.07 - 1.08)以及未通过处方纠正的START遗漏(1.56;1.50 - 1.63)。医院医生通过处方纠正所有入院时的START遗漏与出院后六个月内死亡率大幅降低相关(0.51;0.49 - 0.53)。第二次(0.52;0.50 - 0.55)、第四次(0.56;0.52 - 0.61)、第五次(0.63;0.57 - 0.68)、第六次(0.68;0.61 - 0.76)以及第七次至第三十九次入院时也是如此(0.71;0.65 - 0.78)。“潜在处方遗漏”(PPOs)主要包括所需的心脏药物。这些遗漏发生在该队列首次入院之前,并且在他们的再入院和出院过程中许多一直存在。因此,这些遗漏应由家庭医生在社区入院前纠正,由医院医生在医院内纠正,如果出院后仍存在,则由家庭医生、药剂师和护士团队纠正。这些社区团队还应与患者会面,并关注患者对自身疾病、药物、PPOs以及自我护理能力的理解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11c9/10606166/38fec9d9deec/geriatrics-08-00100-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11c9/10606166/1791156e6789/geriatrics-08-00100-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11c9/10606166/e7ff3d6defbf/geriatrics-08-00100-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11c9/10606166/78272a8f7a9d/geriatrics-08-00100-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11c9/10606166/2cd934253774/geriatrics-08-00100-g004a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11c9/10606166/4d9a4f743aa8/geriatrics-08-00100-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11c9/10606166/38fec9d9deec/geriatrics-08-00100-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11c9/10606166/1791156e6789/geriatrics-08-00100-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11c9/10606166/e7ff3d6defbf/geriatrics-08-00100-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11c9/10606166/78272a8f7a9d/geriatrics-08-00100-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11c9/10606166/2cd934253774/geriatrics-08-00100-g004a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11c9/10606166/4d9a4f743aa8/geriatrics-08-00100-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11c9/10606166/38fec9d9deec/geriatrics-08-00100-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Multi-Year Retrospective Analysis of Mortality and Readmissions Correlated with STOPP/START and the American Geriatric Society Beers Criteria Applied to Calgary Hospital Admissions.对与应用于卡尔加里医院入院患者的STOPP/START及美国老年医学会Beers标准相关的死亡率和再入院率的多年回顾性分析。
Geriatrics (Basel). 2023 Oct 9;8(5):100. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics8050100.
2
Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing and Potential Prescribing Omissions in 82,935 Older Hospitalised Adults: Association with Hospital Readmission and Mortality Within Six Months.82935名老年住院患者中潜在不适当处方及潜在处方遗漏情况:与6个月内再次入院及死亡的关联
Geriatrics (Basel). 2020 Jun 12;5(2):37. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics5020037.
3
Title Assessing Potentially Inappropriate Medications in Seniors: Differences between American Geriatrics Society and STOPP Criteria, and Preventing Adverse Drug Reactions.标题:评估老年人潜在不适当用药情况:美国老年医学会标准与STOPP标准的差异以及预防药物不良反应
Geriatrics (Basel). 2020 Sep 30;5(4):68. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics5040068.
4
The Association Between Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing and Medication-Related Hospital Admissions in Older Patients: A Nested Case Control Study.老年患者潜在不适当处方与药物相关住院之间的关联:一项巢式病例对照研究。
Drug Saf. 2016 Jan;39(1):79-87. doi: 10.1007/s40264-015-0361-1.
5
Hospital readmissions, mortality and potentially inappropriate prescribing: a retrospective study of older adults discharged from hospital.住院患者再入院、死亡和潜在不适当处方:对出院老年患者的回顾性研究。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Aug;84(8):1757-1763. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13607. Epub 2018 May 22.
6
Clinical Implications of Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing According to STOPP/START Version 2 Criteria in Older Polymorbid Patients Discharged From Geriatric and Internal Medicine Wards: A Prospective Observational Multicenter Study.根据 STOPP/START 版本 2 标准,对老年多病患者出院后潜在不适当处方的临床意义:一项前瞻性观察性多中心研究。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Nov;20(11):1476.e1-1476.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.03.023. Epub 2019 May 17.
7
Potentially inappropriate medications and potentially prescribing omissions in Chinese older patients: Comparison of two versions of STOPP/START.潜在不适当药物和潜在处方遗漏在中国老年患者中的比较:两种版本的 STOPP/START。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2020 Dec;45(6):1405-1413. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13237. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
8
Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing and Related Hospital Admissions in Geriatric Patients: A Comparative Analysis between the STOPP and START Criteria Versions 1 and 2.潜在不适当处方和老年患者相关住院治疗:STOPP 和 START 标准版本 1 和 2 的比较分析。
Drugs Aging. 2019 May;36(5):453-459. doi: 10.1007/s40266-018-00635-8.
9
Potentially inappropriate prescribing in older patients admitted to psychiatric hospital.入住精神病医院的老年患者中潜在的不适当用药情况。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2016 Feb;31(2):137-45. doi: 10.1002/gps.4302. Epub 2015 May 31.
10
Potentially inappropriate medications and potential prescribing omissions in hospitalised older adults in New Zealand: A retrospective study.新西兰住院老年患者潜在不适当药物和潜在处方遗漏:一项回顾性研究。
Australas J Ageing. 2023 Dec;42(4):668-674. doi: 10.1111/ajag.13210. Epub 2023 May 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Influenza vaccination for healthcare workers who care for people aged 60 or older living in long-term care institutions.为照顾居住在长期护理机构中的60岁及以上老人的医护人员接种流感疫苗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Feb 27;2(2):CD005187. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005187.pub6.
2
Potentially inappropriate prescribing in polymedicated older adults with atrial fibrillation and multimorbidity: a Swedish national register-based cohort study.多药治疗的老年房颤患者合并多种疾病时潜在不适当处方情况:一项基于瑞典国家登记处的队列研究
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Sep 10;15:1476464. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1476464. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of integrating primary healthcare in aftercare for older patients after discharge from tertiary hospitals-a systematic review and meta-analysis.将初级医疗保健整合到三级医院出院后老年患者的康复护理中的效果-系统评价和荟萃分析。
Age Ageing. 2022 Jun 1;51(6). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac151.
2
Effectiveness of acute geriatric unit care on functional decline, clinical and process outcomes among hospitalised older adults with acute medical complaints: a systematic review and meta-analysis.急性老年医学单元护理对急性内科疾病住院老年患者功能下降、临床和治疗结局的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Age Ageing. 2022 Apr 1;51(4). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac081.
3
LACE Index to Predict the High Risk of 30-Day Readmission: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
预测30天再入院高风险的LACE指数:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Pers Med. 2022 Mar 30;12(4):545. doi: 10.3390/jpm12040545.
4
Risk Factors for Hospital Readmission and Death After Discharge of Older Adults from Acute Geriatric Units: Taking the Rank of Admission into Account.老年急性老年科出院后再入院和死亡的危险因素:考虑入院等级。
Clin Interv Aging. 2021 Oct 29;16:1931-1941. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S327486. eCollection 2021.
5
Impact of pharmacist and physician collaborations in primary care on reducing readmission to hospital: A systematic review and meta-analysis.初级保健中药师与医师合作对降低医院再入院率的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2022 Jun;18(6):2922-2943. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.07.015. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
6
Association of pharmacist counseling with adherence, 30-day readmission, and mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.药师咨询与依从性、30 天再入院率和死亡率的关联:一项随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2021 May-Jun;61(3):340-350.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2021.01.028. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
7
Improving the Care of Older Patients by Decreasing Potentially Inappropriate Medications, Potential Medication Omissions, and Serious Drug Events Using Pharmacogenomic Data about Variability in Metabolizing Many Medications by Seniors.通过利用老年人代谢多种药物的变异性的药物基因组学数据,减少潜在不适当用药、潜在用药遗漏和严重药物事件,改善老年患者的护理。
Geriatrics (Basel). 2020 Sep 27;5(4):64. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics5040064.
8
Optimising Seniors' Metabolism of Medications and Avoiding Adverse Drug Events Using Data on How Metabolism by Their P450 Enzymes Varies with Ancestry and Drug-Drug and Drug-Drug-Gene Interactions.利用老年人细胞色素P450酶代谢随祖先、药物相互作用和药物-药物-基因相互作用而变化的数据,优化老年人的药物代谢并避免药物不良事件。
J Pers Med. 2020 Aug 11;10(3):84. doi: 10.3390/jpm10030084.
9
Importance of previous hospital stays on the risk of hospital re-admission in older adults: a real-life analysis of the PAERPA study population.先前住院经历对老年人再次住院风险的影响:PAERPA 研究人群的真实生活分析。
Age Ageing. 2021 Jan 8;50(1):141-146. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaa139.
10
A Systematic Review of Studies of the STOPP/START 2015 and American Geriatric Society Beers 2015 Criteria in Patients ≥ 65 Years.对2015年STOPP/START标准和2015年美国老年医学会Beers标准在65岁及以上患者中应用的研究的系统评价
Curr Aging Sci. 2019;12(2):121-154. doi: 10.2174/1874609812666190516093742.