Aydin Aksu Sibel, Kursoglu Pinar, Turker Izim, Baskak Fulya, Ozen Sutuven Elifnaz, Meric Kaan, Cabbar Fatih
Department of Radiology, Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, 34668 Istanbul, Turkey.
Department of Prosthodontics, Yeditepe University Faculty of Dentistry, 34728 Istanbul, Turkey.
J Pers Med. 2023 Oct 6;13(10):1467. doi: 10.3390/jpm13101467.
We aimed to investigate whether the collaboration of shear wave elastosonography (SWE) and B-mode ultrasonography (US) could be offered as diagnostic tools to assess the presence, severity, and progress of bruxism, as well as a biomarker for the effectiveness of treatment in daily clinical practice. The study was designed as a quantitative evaluation of the masseter muscles (MMs) of the clinically diagnosed bruxism patients suffering from myofascial pain and MMs of the healthy individuals. Clinical examinations were made according to the diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD), and pain was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS). Painful MMs with VAS scores ≥ 4 were assigned to Group A, and healthy MMs were assigned to Group B. Also, the MMs of the painful bruxers were analyzed based on wearing occlusal splints. Group A was divided into two subgroups as splint users (Group AI) and non-users (Group AII). All the participants were scanned with dynamic US and SWE to quantify the size and stiffness of the MMs. Measurements of each muscle pair while the jaw is in a resting position (relaxation) and clenching position (contraction) were recorded. The significant differences in stiffness and thickness became visible in the relaxation state. Bruxism patients with myofascial pain had significantly harder and thinner MMs than healthy individuals. During the relaxation, the mean thickness and elasticity values were 9.17 ± 0.40 mm and 39.13 ± 4.52 kPa for Group A and 10.38 ± 0.27 and 27.73 ± 1.92 for Group B, respectively. Also, stiffer MMs were measured in Group AII (38.16 ± 3.61 kPa) than in Group AI (26.91 ± 2.13 kPa). In conclusion, the combination of SWE and US using a dynamic examination technique has the potential to be a valuable tool for the management of bruxism patients suffering from myofascial pain.
我们旨在研究剪切波弹性成像(SWE)与B型超声检查(US)的联合应用能否作为一种诊断工具,用于评估磨牙症的存在、严重程度及进展情况,以及作为日常临床实践中治疗效果的生物标志物。本研究设计为对临床诊断为患有肌筋膜疼痛的磨牙症患者的咬肌(MMs)和健康个体的咬肌进行定量评估。根据颞下颌关节紊乱病(DC/TMD)的诊断标准进行临床检查,并使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛程度。VAS评分≥4的疼痛咬肌被分配到A组,健康咬肌被分配到B组。此外,基于佩戴咬合板对疼痛磨牙症患者的咬肌进行分析。A组分为两个亚组,即使用咬合板者(AI组)和未使用者(AII组)。所有参与者均接受动态超声和SWE扫描,以量化咬肌的大小和硬度。记录下颌处于休息位(放松)和紧咬位(收缩)时每对肌肉的测量值。在放松状态下,硬度和厚度的显著差异变得明显。患有肌筋膜疼痛的磨牙症患者的咬肌比健康个体明显更硬且更薄。在放松状态下,A组的平均厚度和弹性值分别为9.17±0.40mm和39.13±4.52kPa,B组分别为10.38±0.27和27.73±1.92。此外,AII组(38.16±3.61kPa)的咬肌硬度测量值高于AI组(26.91±2.13kPa)。总之,使用动态检查技术的SWE和US联合应用有可能成为管理患有肌筋膜疼痛的磨牙症患者的有价值工具。