Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Tennessee Oncology PLCC, Nashville, Tennessee.
Clin Cancer Res. 2024 May 15;30(10):2233-2244. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-3573.
To identify potential predictors of response and resistance mechanisms in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC) treated with the cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor abemaciclib ± endocrine therapy (ET), baseline and acquired genomic alterations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) were analyzed and associated with clinical outcomes.
MONARCH 3: postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2- ABC and no prior systemic therapy in the advanced setting were randomly assigned to abemaciclib or placebo plus nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI). nextMONARCH: women with HR+, HER2- metastatic breast cancer that progressed on/after prior ET and chemotherapy were randomly assigned to abemaciclib alone (two doses) or plus tamoxifen. Baseline and end-of-treatment plasma samples from patients in MONARCH 3 and nextMONARCH (monotherapy arms) were analyzed to identify somatic genomic alterations. Association between genomic alterations and median progression-free survival (mPFS) was assessed.
Most patients had ≥1 genomic alteration detected in baseline ctDNA. In MONARCH 3, abemaciclib+NSAI was associated with improved mPFS versus placebo+NSAI, regardless of baseline alterations. ESR1 alterations were less frequently acquired in the abemaciclib+NSAI arm than placebo+NSAI. Acquired alterations potentially associated with resistance to abemaciclib ± NSAI included RB1 and MYC.
In MONARCH 3, certain baseline ctDNA genomic alterations were prognostic for ET but not predictive of abemaciclib response. Further studies are warranted to assess whether ctDNA alterations acquired during abemaciclib treatment differ from other CDK4/6 inhibitors. Findings are hypothesis generating; further exploration is warranted into mechanisms of resistance to abemaciclib and ET. See related commentary by Wander and Bardia, p. 2008.
鉴定激素受体阳性(HR+)、HER2 阴性(HER2-)晚期乳腺癌(ABC)患者接受细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶 4 和 6(CDK4/6)抑制剂 abemaciclib±内分泌治疗(ET)的潜在反应预测因子和耐药机制,分析基线和获得性循环肿瘤 DNA(ctDNA)中的基因组改变,并将其与临床结果相关联。
MONARCH 3:绝经后 HR+、HER2-ABC 且无晚期系统治疗史的患者被随机分配至 abemaciclib 或安慰剂+非甾体芳香化酶抑制剂(NSAI)。nextMONARCH:先前 ET 和化疗进展后的 HR+、HER2-转移性乳腺癌患者被随机分配至 abemaciclib 单药(两种剂量)或 abemaciclib+他莫昔芬。MONARCH 3 和 nextMONARCH(单药治疗组)患者的基线和治疗结束时的血浆样本被分析以鉴定体细胞基因组改变。评估基因组改变与中位无进展生存期(mPFS)之间的关联。
大多数患者的基线 ctDNA 中均检测到≥1 个基因组改变。在 MONARCH 3 中,abemaciclib+NSAI 与安慰剂+NSAI 相比,mPFS 得到改善,而与基线改变无关。abemaciclib+NSAI 组中 ESR1 改变较安慰剂+NSAI 组少见。可能与 abemaciclib±NSAI 耐药相关的获得性改变包括 RB1 和 MYC。
在 MONARCH 3 中,某些基线 ctDNA 基因组改变对 ET 具有预后意义,但不能预测 abemaciclib 的反应。需要进一步研究以评估 abemaciclib 治疗期间获得的 ctDNA 改变是否与其他 CDK4/6 抑制剂不同。这些发现是推测性的;需要进一步探索 abemaciclib 和 ET 耐药的机制。有关 Wander 和 Bardia 的相关评论,请参见 2008 年第 2008 页。