Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 1717 East Monument St., Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe St., Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
AIDS Behav. 2024 Mar;28(3):1068-1076. doi: 10.1007/s10461-023-04217-7. Epub 2023 Oct 27.
HIV-related stigma remains a significant barrier to implementing effective HIV treatment and prevention strategies in Nigeria. Despite the high uptake of peer support groups among people living with HIV (PLHIV) in Nigeria, the potential role of such peer support on the burden of internalized stigma remains understudied. To address this gap, we conducted a secondary analysis of the PLHIV Stigma Index 2.0, a socio-behavioral survey implemented by PLHIV led-organizations to assess the relationship between group membership and internalized stigma. Internalized stigma was measured using the Internalized AIDS-related Stigma Scale. Multinomial logistic regression was used to measure the association between self-reported engagement in peer support groups and internalized stigma adjusting for age, education, duration since HIV diagnosis, employment, disclosure status, and sex-work engagement. Of the 1,244 respondents in this study, 75.1% were engaged in HIV peer support groups. Over half (55.5%) and about one-fourth (27.3%) demonstrated low/moderate and high levels of internalized stigma, respectively. PLHIV engaged in HIV peer support groups were less likely to report both low/moderate (versus no) (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 0.47 [95% CI: 0.27 to 0.81]; p = 0.006) and high (versus no) (aOR: 0.30 [95% CI: 0.17 to 0.53]; p < 0.001) levels of internalized stigma compared to those not engaged. In this study, the burden of internalized stigma is high among PLHIV in Nigeria. However, engagement in peer support groups appears to mitigate these stigmas. Stigma mitigation strategies to increase peer support may represent a critical tool in decreasing sustained HIV treatment gaps among PLHIV in Nigeria.
艾滋病毒相关耻辱感仍然是在尼日利亚实施有效艾滋病毒治疗和预防战略的重大障碍。尽管尼日利亚艾滋病毒感染者(PLHIV)对同伴支持团体的接受程度很高,但此类同伴支持对内化耻辱感负担的潜在作用仍研究不足。为了解决这一差距,我们对 PLHIV 耻辱指数 2.0 进行了二次分析,该指数是由 PLHIV 领导的组织实施的一项社会行为调查,用于评估团体成员身份与内化耻辱感之间的关系。内化耻辱感使用内化艾滋病相关耻辱量表进行衡量。使用多项逻辑回归来衡量自我报告参与同伴支持团体与内化耻辱感之间的关联,同时调整年龄、教育程度、艾滋病毒诊断后时间、就业状况、披露状况和性工作参与状况等因素。在这项研究中,有 1244 名受访者,其中 75.1%参与了艾滋病毒同伴支持团体。超过一半(55.5%)和大约四分之一(27.3%)分别表现出低度/中度和高度内化耻辱感。与未参与的人相比,参与艾滋病毒同伴支持团体的 PLHIV 报告低度/中度(与无)(调整后的优势比(aOR):0.47 [95%置信区间:0.27 至 0.81];p=0.006)和高度(与无)(aOR:0.30 [95%置信区间:0.17 至 0.53];p<0.001)内化耻辱感的可能性较小。在这项研究中,尼日利亚 PLHIV 的内化耻辱感负担很高。然而,参与同伴支持团体似乎可以减轻这些耻辱感。增加同伴支持的耻辱感缓解策略可能是减少尼日利亚 PLHIV 持续艾滋病毒治疗差距的关键工具。