• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

跟腱修复中鞋带缝合技术的生物力学比较

Biomechanical comparison of shoelace suture technique for repairing calcaneal tendon.

机构信息

Homero de Miranda Gomes Regional Hospital, São José, and Adames Central Medic(CMA), Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.

Biomechanichal Engineering Laboratory, University Hospital, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.

出版信息

Injury. 2023 Dec;54(12):111134. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.111134. Epub 2023 Oct 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2023.111134
PMID:37890290
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The biomechanical assessment of tendon repair is essential for the evaluation of different tendon suturing techniques. The shoelace suture technique with absorbable Vicryl® is a modified technique of Achilles tendon repair that may have biomechanical advantages depending on the number of threads used and the direction of the suture.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the creep under constant pre-load, the stiffness, the maximum strength, and the failure mode for three different configurations of the shoelace suture in a bovine tendon biomechanical model.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled Laboratory Study.

METHODS

36 bovine Achilles tendon specimens were acquired and divided into three test groups of 12 Achilles tendons each. A model of the calcaneal tendon rupture was created through a transverse cut with a scalpel, performed 5 centimeters proximal to the calcaneal bone insertion. Group 1 was repaired using the simple shoelace technique with just one suture. Group 2 was repaired using the shoelace technique with three sutures individually sutured from distal to proximal at the site of rupture. Group 3 was repaired using the shoelace technique with three sutures individually sutured from proximal to distal at the site of rupture.

RESULTS

System creep after constant pre-load was 5.9 ± 2.5 mm, 3.0 ± 0.4 mm and 2.9 ± 0.4 mm for groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The system's stiffness was 23.2 ± 2.8 N/mm, 30.3 ± 1.1 N/mm and 29.8 ± 2.3 N/mm for groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. In the final load-to-failure test, the ultimate load force (ULF) was 158.2 ± 27.5 N, 346.5 ± 47.6 N and 358.1 ± 41.6 N for groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. There was statistical significance in the comparative tests between groups 1-2 and 1-3 in terms of means of creep, system stiffness and maximum system strength. No statistically significant difference was found between groups 2 and 3 when analyzing creep, system stiffness and ULF. Suture breakage was the prevalent mode of failure for all tested groups.

CONCLUSION

The shoelace with three sutures significantly reduced creep in the preloading phase and increased the stiffness and ultimate load force. The biomechanical results demonstrate better overall mechanical performance of the technique than the simple shoelace technique. The better mechanical performance indicates that the shoelace with three sutures could result in early postoperative rehabilitation.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study indicates that the shoelace suture technique with three sutures is biomechanically strong and stiff, being a possible therapeutic option to be used.

摘要

背景

对于不同的肌腱缝合技术,评估肌腱修复的生物力学至关重要。鞋带缝合技术(使用可吸收的 Vicryl®)是一种改良的跟腱修复技术,根据使用的缝线数量和缝线方向的不同,可能具有生物力学优势。

目的

在牛跟腱生物力学模型中,评估三种不同鞋带缝合方式的恒定预载下的蠕变、刚度、最大强度和失效模式。

研究设计

对照实验室研究。

方法

采集 36 个牛跟腱标本,分为三组,每组 12 个跟腱。通过手术刀进行横切,在距跟骨插入处 5 厘米处创建跟腱断裂模型。第 1 组采用简单的鞋带技术,仅使用一根缝线进行修复。第 2 组采用三根缝线的鞋带技术,每根缝线单独从远到近在断裂处缝合。第 3 组采用三根缝线的鞋带技术,每根缝线单独从近到远在断裂处缝合。

结果

恒定预载后的系统蠕变分别为组 1(5.9±2.5)mm、组 2(3.0±0.4)mm 和组 3(2.9±0.4)mm。系统刚度分别为组 1(23.2±2.8)N/mm、组 2(30.3±1.1)N/mm 和组 3(29.8±2.3)N/mm。在最终的破坏试验中,极限载荷力(ULF)分别为组 1(158.2±27.5)N、组 2(346.5±47.6)N 和组 3(358.1±41.6)N。在组 1-2 和组 1-3 之间的比较测试中,蠕变、系统刚度和最大系统强度的平均值存在统计学意义。在分析蠕变、系统刚度和 ULF 时,组 2 和组 3 之间没有发现统计学差异。缝线断裂是所有测试组的主要失效模式。

结论

三缝线鞋带技术可显著减少预加载阶段的蠕变,增加刚度和极限载荷力。生物力学结果表明,该技术的整体力学性能优于简单的鞋带技术。更好的机械性能表明,三缝线鞋带技术可能会导致术后早期康复。

临床相关性

本研究表明,三缝线鞋带技术具有较强的生物力学性能,坚固而僵硬,是一种可行的治疗选择。

相似文献

1
Biomechanical comparison of shoelace suture technique for repairing calcaneal tendon.跟腱修复中鞋带缝合技术的生物力学比较
Injury. 2023 Dec;54(12):111134. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.111134. Epub 2023 Oct 15.
2
[Biomechanical study of different suture methods in repairing tendon rupture].不同缝合方法修复肌腱断裂的生物力学研究
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Oct 15;31(10):1208-1213. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201705007.
3
Biomechanical properties of different techniques used in vitro for suturing mid-substance Achilles tendon ruptures.体外用于缝合跟腱中间部断裂的不同技术的生物力学特性。
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2017 Dec;50:78-83. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2017.10.008. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
4
Proximal and Distal Failure Site Analysis in Percutaneous Achilles Tendon Rupture Repair.经皮跟腱断裂修复术中近侧和远侧失效部位分析。
Foot Ankle Int. 2019 Dec;40(12):1424-1429. doi: 10.1177/1071100719867937. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
5
[Biomechanical comparison study of two ultra-strong sutures in repair of Achilles tendon via panda rope bridge technique].两种超强缝线经熊猫绳桥技术修复跟腱的生物力学比较研究
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Sep 15;33(9):1147-1150. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201811038.
6
Interlocking horizontal mattress suture versus Kakiuchi technique in repair of Achilles tendon rupture: a biomechanical study.跟腱断裂修复中交锁水平褥式缝合法与柿内 technique 的比较:一项生物力学研究
J Orthop Traumatol. 2017 Sep;18(3):251-257. doi: 10.1007/s10195-017-0455-x. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
7
Achilles tendon rupture repair: Biomechanical comparison of the locking block modified Krackow technique and the Giftbox technique.跟腱断裂修复:改良 Krackow 锁边技术与 Giftbox 技术的生物力学比较。
Injury. 2020 Feb;51(2):559-564. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.10.019. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
8
Does plastic suture deformation induce gapping after tendon repair? A biomechanical comparison of different suture materials.肌腱修复后塑料缝线变形会导致间隙形成吗?不同缝线材料的生物力学比较。
J Biomech. 2016 Sep 6;49(13):2607-2612. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.05.023. Epub 2016 May 25.
9
A comparative biomechanical study of the krackow suture technique with three common percutaneous suture techniques in the treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures.一种克氏缝合技术与三种常见经皮缝合技术治疗跟腱断裂的比较生物力学研究。
Foot Ankle Surg. 2024 Jul;30(5):366-370. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2024.02.006. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
10
A biomechanical comparison of Achilles tendon suture repair techniques: Locking Block Modified Krackow, Kessler, and Percutaneous Achilles Repair System with the early rehabilitation program in vitro bovine model.跟腱缝合修复技术的生物力学比较:锁定块改良Krackow法、Kessler法以及经皮跟腱修复系统与早期康复计划在体外牛模型中的比较
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020 Nov;140(11):1775-1782. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03535-y. Epub 2020 Jul 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Biomechanical analysis of different techniques for residual bone defect from tibial plateau bone cyst in total knee arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术中胫骨平台骨囊肿残余骨缺损不同技术的生物力学分析
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Oct 30;12:1498882. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1498882. eCollection 2024.