• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在冠状动脉疾病的诊断和管理中,我们应该首先选择CT血管造影而不是首先选择SPECT/PET吗?

Should we choose CT angiography first instead of SPECT/PET first for the diagnosis and management of coronary artery disease?

作者信息

Pontone Gianluca, Rossi Alexia, Gimelli Alessia, Neglia Danilo

机构信息

Department of Periooperative Cardiology and Cardiovascular Imaging, Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Atherosclerosis. 2023 Nov;385:117315. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2023.117315. Epub 2023 Oct 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2023.117315
PMID:37890440
Abstract

In patients presenting with chest pain, current guidelines recommend the use of coronary computed tomography angiography and single-photon emission tomography/positron emission tomography, both with equal class 1 indication and level of evidence A. There is no clear recommendation on which test should be used as a first-line test. The choice of the test should be based on individualized clinical risk assessment, patient characteristics, local expertise/availability, and patient preferences. In this context, it is fair to ask which non-invasive imaging test to choose. The debate reproduced in this article answers this question by summarizing the considerations in selecting present state-of-the-art criteria of the right test for the right patient to ensure efficient resource utilization, minimize unnecessary testing, and maximize diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic efficacy.

摘要

对于出现胸痛的患者,当前指南推荐使用冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影术和单光子发射计算机断层扫描/正电子发射断层扫描,二者均具有同等的1类适应证和A类证据水平。对于应将哪种检查用作一线检查尚无明确推荐。检查的选择应基于个体化的临床风险评估、患者特征、当地的专业技术/可及性以及患者偏好。在这种情况下,询问选择哪种非侵入性成像检查是合理的。本文重现的这场辩论通过总结为合适的患者选择合适检查的当前最先进标准时的考量因素,回答了这个问题,以确保有效利用资源、尽量减少不必要的检查,并最大限度提高诊断准确性和治疗效果。

相似文献

1
Should we choose CT angiography first instead of SPECT/PET first for the diagnosis and management of coronary artery disease?在冠状动脉疾病的诊断和管理中,我们应该首先选择CT血管造影而不是首先选择SPECT/PET吗?
Atherosclerosis. 2023 Nov;385:117315. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2023.117315. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
2
Randomized Comparison of Clinical Effectiveness of Pharmacologic SPECT and PET MPI in Symptomatic CAD Patients.症状性 CAD 患者药物负荷 SPECT 和 PET MPI 临床疗效的随机比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Sep;12(9):1821-1831. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.04.020. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
3
Coronary computed tomography angiography vs. myocardial single photon emission computed tomography in patients with intermediate risk chest pain: a randomized clinical trial for cost-effectiveness comparison based on real-world cost.冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影与心肌单光子发射计算机断层扫描在中危胸痛患者中的比较:基于真实世界成本的成本效益随机临床试验。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Apr 1;20(4):417-425. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jey099.
4
SPECT/PET myocardial perfusion imaging versus coronary CT angiography in patients with known or suspected CAD.已知或疑似冠心病患者的SPECT/PET心肌灌注成像与冠状动脉CT血管造影对比
Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010 Apr;54(2):177-200.
5
Detection of significant coronary artery disease by noninvasive anatomical and functional imaging.通过非侵入性解剖和功能成像检测显著冠状动脉疾病。
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Mar;8(3). doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.114.002179.
6
Diagnostic performance of noninvasive myocardial perfusion imaging using single-photon emission computed tomography, cardiac magnetic resonance, and positron emission tomography imaging for the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.应用单光子发射计算机断层扫描、心脏磁共振和正电子发射断层成像术无创性心肌灌注成像对检测阻塞性冠状动脉疾病的诊断性能:一项荟萃分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 May 8;59(19):1719-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.12.040.
7
Diagnostic performance of non-invasive imaging for stable coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis.无创影像学在稳定型冠状动脉疾病诊断中的应用效能:一项荟萃分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2020 Feb 1;300:276-281. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.10.046. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
8
Prognostic Value of Combined CT Angiography and Myocardial Perfusion Imaging versus Invasive Coronary Angiography and Nuclear Stress Perfusion Imaging in the Prediction of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events: The CORE320 Multicenter Study.联合CT血管造影和心肌灌注成像与有创冠状动脉造影及核素负荷灌注成像在预测主要不良心血管事件中的预后价值:CORE320多中心研究
Radiology. 2017 Jul;284(1):55-65. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017161565. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
9
Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Versus Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Testing in Stable Patients With Intermediate-Range Coronary Lesions: Influence on Downstream Diagnostic Workflows and Invasive Angiography Findings.稳定性中等范围冠状动脉病变患者的心肌灌注成像与基于计算机断层扫描血管造影的血流储备分数检测:对下游诊断流程和有创血管造影结果的影响。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Aug 22;6(8):e005587. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.005587.
10
Characteristics and key differences between patient populations receiving imaging modalities for coronary artery disease diagnosis in the US.美国接受用于冠心病诊断的影像学方法的患者人群的特征和关键差异。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023 May 15;23(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s12872-023-03218-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Contemporary Functional Coronary Angiography: An Update.当代功能性冠状动脉造影:最新进展
Future Cardiol. 2024;20(14):755-778. doi: 10.1080/14796678.2024.2416817. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
2
The Role of Multimodality Imaging (CT & MR) as a Guide to the Management of Chronic Coronary Syndromes.多模态成像(CT与MR)在慢性冠状动脉综合征管理中的指导作用
J Clin Med. 2024 Jun 13;13(12):3450. doi: 10.3390/jcm13123450.