Suppr超能文献

背负式、喷杆式和无人机喷雾器用于大豆(Glycine max L.)杂草治理的比较研究。

Comparative studies of knapsack, boom, and drone sprayers for weed management in soybean (Glycine max L.).

作者信息

Hiremath Chaitanya, Khatri Narendra, Jagtap Megha P

机构信息

Department of Agronomy, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani, 431402, Maharashtra, India.

Department of Mechatronics, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, Karnataka., India.

出版信息

Environ Res. 2024 Jan 1;240(Pt 1):117480. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.117480. Epub 2023 Oct 27.

Abstract

The study titled, "Comparative Evaluation of Knapsack, Boom, and Drone Sprayers for Weed Management in Soybean (Glycine max L.)" was carried out during the Kharif season 2021-22 at an experimental farm affiliated with the Department of Agronomy, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani. The primary objective was to evaluate the comparative efficacy of various sprayers in controlling weeds in soybeans and their work efficiency. The Randomized Block Design (RBD) included ten treatments of pre-emergence (PE) and post-emergence (POE) herbicides applied by knapsack, boom, and drone sprayers. Pendimethalin 30% EC @ 750 g a.i ha was used for pre-emergence herbicide application, and Imazamox 35% EC + Imazethapyr 35% WG @ 70 g a.i ha were used for post-emergence. These treatments were tested on soybean Monocot and Dicot weed count, weed dry weight, weed index, and weed control efficiency. The sprayers were compared for time, water, labor, herbicide, and overall work efficiency. A knapsack sprayer showed the best results for pre- and post-emergence herbicide application, with the lowest weed count, dry weight, control efficiency, and weed index. Boom and drone sprayers followed in effectiveness. Herbicide application was faster with the drone sprayer than with hand weeding, cultural practices, boom sprayer, and knapsack sprayer. Compared to knapsack and boom sprayers, the drone sprayer used less water and labour. Drone sprayers work most efficiently, followed by boom and knapsack sprayers. This study focuses on the prevalence of herbicides and their impact on non-target ecosystems. It aims to develop mitigation strategies by optimizing spraying efficiency and reducing herbicide usage during pre and post emergence. The dissemination of efficient weed management practices that reduce environmental impacts and increase the efficiency of soybean cultivation is consistent with Sustainable Development Goal 15: life on land.

摘要

题为《背负式、喷杆式和无人机喷雾器对大豆(Glycine max L.)杂草治理的比较评估》的研究于2021 - 2022年雨季在位于帕尔巴尼的瓦桑特拉奥·奈克马哈拉施特拉农业大学农学系附属的试验农场进行。主要目的是评估各种喷雾器在控制大豆杂草方面的比较效果及其工作效率。随机区组设计(RBD)包括通过背负式、喷杆式和无人机喷雾器施用的十种苗前(PE)和苗后(POE)除草剂处理。30%乙草胺乳油750克有效成分/公顷用于苗前除草剂施用,35%甲氧咪草烟乳油 + 35%咪唑乙烟酸可湿性粉剂70克有效成分/公顷用于苗后施用。这些处理在大豆上进行了单子叶和双子叶杂草计数、杂草干重、杂草指数和杂草控制效率测试。对喷雾器在时间、水、劳动力、除草剂和总体工作效率方面进行了比较。背负式喷雾器在苗前和苗后除草剂施用方面显示出最佳效果,杂草计数、干重、控制效率和杂草指数最低。喷杆式和无人机喷雾器的效果次之。无人机喷雾器施用除草剂比人工除草、栽培措施、喷杆式喷雾器和背负式喷雾器更快。与背负式和喷杆式喷雾器相比,无人机喷雾器用水和劳动力更少。无人机喷雾器工作效率最高,其次是喷杆式和背负式喷雾器。本研究关注除草剂的普遍性及其对非目标生态系统的影响。旨在通过优化喷雾效率和减少苗前和苗后除草剂使用来制定缓解策略。传播减少环境影响并提高大豆种植效率的高效杂草治理实践符合可持续发展目标15:陆地生物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验