• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[评估医疗保健管理人员患者安全文化的问卷的验证:心理测量特性和可用性]

[Validation of a questionnaire to assess patient safety culture in healthcare managers: Psychometric properties and usability].

作者信息

Garzón González G, Parra Ramírez L M

机构信息

Unidad de Calidad y Seguridad del Paciente, Gerencia Asistencial de Atención Primaria, Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Madrid, España.

Unidad de Calidad y Seguridad del Paciente, Gerencia Asistencial de Atención Primaria, Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Madrid, España.

出版信息

J Healthc Qual Res. 2023 Nov-Dec;38(6):354-365. doi: 10.1016/j.jhqr.2023.09.004. Epub 2023 Oct 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhqr.2023.09.004
PMID:37891095
Abstract

AIM

To validate a reduced and applicable to distinct location version of the only validated questionnaire of patient safety culture in managers in Spanish language.

METHOD

Questionnaire validation study. Community of Madrid 2022. Reduction/adaptation of the original questionnaire: Giménez-Aibar-Gutiérrez, 2013 Questionnaire was reduced from 85 items to 25; those local or not applicable were removed. Pre-test: Semi-structured survey on comprehension and response scale. There was no need to modify the questionnaire.

VALIDATION

It was tested in 39 primary care managers without care activity. Internal consistency (α Cronbach), content validity (experts) and construct validity (factor analysis) were analysed. Usability analysis: Survey on time spent and non-response rate.

RESULTS

α Cronbach=0.894. Content validity: Experts deemed questionnaire was complete. Factor analysis: five factors explain 68% of variance. The factors corresponded to the dimensions of the theoretical construct. Factors, internal consistency of each and correlation with global score were: commitment with patient safety: α Cronbach=0.793, r=0.778; P<.001; procedures/reporting: α Cronbach=0.83, r=0.806; P<.001; attitudes with patient safety: α Cronbach=0.766, r=0.596; P<.001; clinicians involving: α Cronbach=0.773, r=0.798; P<.001; patient safety communication: α Cronbach=0.615, r=0.518; P=.001; usability survey: 95% thought spent time was adequate. Non-response rate was 0%, except one item.

CONCLUSION

In this work, a reduced and adapted version of questionnaire of Giménez-Aibar-Gutiérrez was validated at distinct location (Madrid region). Psychometric properties and usability, which were found, suggest that the reduced questionnaire is a reliable, valid and usable instrument to assess patient safety culture in managers of any place.

摘要

目的

验证一份经过简化且适用于不同地点的西班牙语版患者安全文化调查问卷,该问卷是唯一经过验证的针对管理人员的问卷。

方法

问卷验证研究。马德里自治区,2022年。对原始问卷进行简化/改编:希门尼斯 - 艾瓦尔 - 古铁雷斯,2013年。问卷从85项减少到25项;删除了那些具有局限性或不适用的项目。预测试:关于理解和回答量表的半结构化调查。无需修改问卷。

验证

在39名无护理活动的基层医疗管理人员中进行测试。分析内部一致性(克朗巴赫α系数)、内容效度(专家评估)和结构效度(因子分析)。可用性分析:关于完成时间和无回答率的调查。

结果

克朗巴赫α系数 = 0.894。内容效度:专家认为问卷完整。因子分析:五个因子解释了68%的方差。这些因子与理论结构的维度相对应。各因子、每个因子的内部一致性以及与总体得分的相关性分别为:对患者安全的承诺:克朗巴赫α系数 = 0.793,r = 0.778;P <.001;程序/报告:克朗巴赫α系数 = 0.83,r = 0.806;P <.001;对患者安全的态度:克朗巴赫α系数 = 0.766,r = 0.596;P <.001;临床医生参与度:克朗巴赫α系数 = 0.773,r = 0.798;P <.001;患者安全沟通:克朗巴赫α系数 = 0.615,r = 0.518;P =.001;可用性调查:95%的人认为完成时间足够。除一项外,无回答率为0%。

结论

在本研究中,希门尼斯 - 艾瓦尔 - 古铁雷斯问卷的简化改编版在不同地点(马德里地区)得到验证。所发现的心理测量特性和可用性表明,简化后的问卷是评估任何地方管理人员患者安全文化的可靠、有效且可用的工具。

相似文献

1
[Validation of a questionnaire to assess patient safety culture in healthcare managers: Psychometric properties and usability].[评估医疗保健管理人员患者安全文化的问卷的验证:心理测量特性和可用性]
J Healthc Qual Res. 2023 Nov-Dec;38(6):354-365. doi: 10.1016/j.jhqr.2023.09.004. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
2
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture 2.0 - Brazilian version.跨文化调适与验证《医院患者安全文化调查 2.0 版》- 巴西版。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jan 14;23(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08890-7.
3
[Creation and validation of a new in-house synthetic scale to measure patient safety culture].[一种用于衡量患者安全文化的新型内部综合量表的创建与验证]
J Healthc Qual Res. 2019 Jan-Feb;34(1):12-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jhqr.2018.12.001. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
4
Accidental Bowel Leakage Evaluation: A New Patient-Centered Validated Measure of Accidental Bowel Leakage Symptoms in Women.意外性肠漏评估:一种新的以患者为中心的女性意外性肠漏症状的验证性测量方法。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2020 May;63(5):668-677. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001596.
5
[Translation, adaptation and validation in Catalan of a questionnaire about patient safety culture: The MOSPSC (Medical Office Survey on Patient Safety Culture) questionnaire].[一份关于患者安全文化问卷(医疗办公室患者安全文化调查问卷,即MOSPSC问卷)的加泰罗尼亚语翻译、改编及验证]
J Healthc Qual Res. 2019 Sep-Oct;34(5):248-257. doi: 10.1016/j.jhqr.2019.05.012. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
6
Psychometric Properties of the Latin American Spanish Version of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture Questionnaire in the Surgical Setting.拉丁美洲西班牙语版医院患者安全文化调查问卷在外科环境下的心理计量特性。
J Patient Saf. 2021 Dec 1;17(8):e1806-e1813. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000644.
7
The safety attitudes questionnaire in Chinese: psychometric properties and benchmarking data of the safety culture in Beijing hospitals.中文版安全态度问卷:北京医院安全文化的心理测量特性及基准数据
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug 23;17(1):590. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2543-2.
8
Assessing the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ), German language version in Swiss university hospitals--a validation study.评估安全态度问卷(SAQ),德语版,瑞士大学医院-验证研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Sep 10;13:347. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-347.
9
Cultural adaptation and validation of a peninsular Spanish version of the MSTCQ (Multiple Sclerosis Treatment Concerns Questionnaire).《多发性硬化症治疗关注问卷》西班牙半岛版本的文化适应性与验证
Neurologia. 2017 Jan-Feb;32(1):29-39. doi: 10.1016/j.nrl.2014.12.011. Epub 2015 Feb 16.
10
Transcultural adaptation and psychometric study of the French version of the nursing home survey on patient safety culture questionnaire.跨文化调适与护理院患者安全文化问卷法语版的心理计量学研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jul 15;19(1):490. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4333-5.

引用本文的文献

1
[Walkrounds: Do this improve safety culture of clinicians and managers? Cross-sectional study at Primary Care setting].[巡诊:这是否能改善临床医生和管理人员的安全文化?基层医疗环境中的横断面研究]
Aten Primaria. 2023 Nov;55(11):102733. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2023.102733. Epub 2023 Aug 23.