Zhang Fengbin, Zhou Yonghe, Li Xin, Wang Chunyan, Liu Jie, Li Shuang, Zhang Shuting, Luo Weiming, Zhao Lili, Li Jia
Clinical School of the Second People's Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China.
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tianjin Second People's Hospital, Tianjin 300192, China.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Oct 10;13(20):3164. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13203164.
Currently, most primary hospitals cannot routinely perform liver stiffness measurements (LSMs) and spleen stiffness measurements (SSMs), which are recommended by guidelines to exclude high-risk varices (HRVs). We tried to find more convenient indicators for HRV screening. We enrolled 213 cirrhosis patients as the training cohort (TC) and 65 primary biliary cirrhosis patients as the validation cohort (VC). We included indicators such as SSM by two-dimensional shear wave elastography, LSM by transient elastography, and other imaging and laboratory tests. Variable analysis revealed SSM, platelets (PLT), and spleen thickness (ST) as independent risk indicators for HRV. In TC, ST+PLT (ST < 42.2 mm and PLT > 113.5 × 10/L) could avoid 35.7% of the esophagogastroduodenoscopies (EGDs), with a 2.4% missed HRV rate. Although the proportion of EGDs spared by ST+PLT was less than SSM+PLT (SSM < 29.89 kPa + PLT > 113.5 × 10/L) (35.7% vs. 44.1%), it was higher than that of the Baveno VI criteria (B6) (35.7% vs. 28.2%). We did not validate SSM+PLT in VC considering our aims. ST+PLT safely spared 24.6% of EGDs in VC, identical to B6. Conclusions: The ability of ST+PLT to exclude HRVs was superior to B6 but slightly inferior to SSM+PLT. When SSM cannot be routinely performed, ST+PLT provides an extra option for patients to exclude HRVs as a more convenient model.
目前,大多数基层医院无法常规进行肝硬度测量(LSM)和脾硬度测量(SSM),而指南推荐这些检查用于排除高危静脉曲张(HRV)。我们试图寻找更便捷的HRV筛查指标。我们纳入了213例肝硬化患者作为训练队列(TC),65例原发性胆汁性肝硬化患者作为验证队列(VC)。我们纳入了诸如二维剪切波弹性成像的SSM、瞬时弹性成像的LSM以及其他影像学和实验室检查等指标。变量分析显示SSM、血小板(PLT)和脾厚度(ST)是HRV的独立风险指标。在TC中,ST + PLT(ST < 42.2 mm且PLT > 113.5×10⁹/L)可避免35.7%的食管胃十二指肠镜检查(EGD),HRV漏诊率为2.4%。尽管ST + PLT节省的EGD比例低于SSM + PLT(SSM < 29.89 kPa + PLT > 113.5×10⁹/L)(35.7%对44.1%),但高于巴韦诺VI标准(B6)(35.7%对28.2%)。考虑到我们的研究目的,我们未在VC中验证SSM + PLT。ST + PLT在VC中安全地节省了24.6%的EGD,与B6相同。结论:ST + PLT排除HRV的能力优于B6,但略逊于SSM + PLT。当无法常规进行SSM时,ST + PLT为患者提供了一个额外的选择,作为一种更便捷的模型来排除HRV。