• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊科胸痛患者安全避免二次肌钙蛋白检测的HEAR路径推导

Derivation of a HEAR Pathway for Emergency Department Chest Pain Patients to Safely Avoid a Second Troponin Test.

作者信息

Chen Chen, Yu Yao, Chen Dongxu, Cai Canguang, Zhou Yannan, Liao Fengqing, Humarbek Alima, Li Xuan, Song Zhenju, Sun Zhan, Tong Chaoyang, Yao Chenling, Gu Guorong

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Oct 16;13(20):3217. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13203217.

DOI:10.3390/diagnostics13203217
PMID:37892038
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10605779/
Abstract

The study aims to develop a decision pathway based on HEAR score and 0 h high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) to safely avoid a second troponin test for suspected non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) in emergency departments. A HEAR score consists of history, electrocardiogram, age, and risk factors. A HEAR pathway is established using a Bayesian approach based on a predefined safety threshold of NSTEMI prevalence in the rule-out group. In total, 7131 patients were retrospectively enrolled, 582 (8.2%) with index visit NSTEMI and 940 (13.2%) with 180-day major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). For patients with a low-risk HEAR score (0 to 2) and low 0 h hs-cTnT (<14 ng/L), the HEAR pathway recommends early discharge without further testing. After the HEAR pathway had been applied to rule out NSTEMI, the negative predictive value of index visit NSTEMI was 100.0% (95% CI, 99.8% to 100.0%) and false-negative rate of 180-day MACE was 0.40% (95% CI, 0.18% to 0.87%). Compared with the 0 h hs-cTnT < limit of detection (LoD) strategy (<5 ng/L), the HEAR pathway could correctly reclassify 1298 patients without MACE as low risk and lead to a 18.2% decrease (95% CI, 17.4-19.1%) in the need for a second troponin test. The HEAR pathway may lead to a substantial and safe reduction in repeated troponin test for emergency department patients with suspected NSTEMI.

摘要

本研究旨在基于HEAR评分和0小时高敏心肌肌钙蛋白T(hs-cTnT)制定一条决策路径,以在急诊科安全地避免对疑似非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)患者进行二次肌钙蛋白检测。HEAR评分由病史、心电图、年龄和危险因素组成。基于排除组中NSTEMI患病率的预定义安全阈值,采用贝叶斯方法建立HEAR路径。总共回顾性纳入了7131例患者,其中582例(8.2%)初次就诊时诊断为NSTEMI,940例(13.2%)发生了180天主要不良心血管事件(MACE)。对于HEAR评分低风险(0至2分)且0小时hs-cTnT低(<14 ng/L)的患者,HEAR路径建议早期出院,无需进一步检测。在应用HEAR路径排除NSTEMI后,初次就诊时NSTEMI的阴性预测值为100.0%(95%CI,99.8%至100.0%),180天MACE的假阴性率为0.40%(95%CI,0.18%至0.87%)。与0小时hs-cTnT<检测下限(LoD)策略(<5 ng/L)相比,HEAR路径可将1298例无MACE的患者正确重新分类为低风险,并使二次肌钙蛋白检测需求降低18.2%(95%CI,17.4 - 19.1%)。HEAR路径可能会大幅且安全地减少对急诊科疑似NSTEMI患者重复进行肌钙蛋白检测的情况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f59b/10605779/848e08101bda/diagnostics-13-03217-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f59b/10605779/b3e67609e60e/diagnostics-13-03217-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f59b/10605779/5e7035f47389/diagnostics-13-03217-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f59b/10605779/f8e9cff4457a/diagnostics-13-03217-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f59b/10605779/7491b573b799/diagnostics-13-03217-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f59b/10605779/848e08101bda/diagnostics-13-03217-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f59b/10605779/b3e67609e60e/diagnostics-13-03217-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f59b/10605779/5e7035f47389/diagnostics-13-03217-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f59b/10605779/f8e9cff4457a/diagnostics-13-03217-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f59b/10605779/7491b573b799/diagnostics-13-03217-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f59b/10605779/848e08101bda/diagnostics-13-03217-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Derivation of a HEAR Pathway for Emergency Department Chest Pain Patients to Safely Avoid a Second Troponin Test.急诊科胸痛患者安全避免二次肌钙蛋白检测的HEAR路径推导
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Oct 16;13(20):3217. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13203217.
2
Evaluation of HEAR score to rule-out major adverse cardiac events without troponin test in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain.运用 HEAR 评分系统,在急诊科胸痛就诊患者中,无需进行肌钙蛋白检测即可排除主要不良心脏事件。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2021 Aug 1;28(4):292-298. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000791.
3
Evaluation of the 0 h/1 h high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T algorithm in diagnosis of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) in Han population.评价 0 h/1 h 高敏肌钙蛋白 T 算法在汉族人群中非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)诊断中的应用。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Dec 23;59(4):757-764. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-0367. Print 2021 Mar 26.
4
Use of the HEAR Score for 30-Day Risk-Stratification in Emergency Department Patients.HEAR 评分在急诊科患者 30 天风险分层中的应用。
Am J Med. 2023 Sep;136(9):918-926.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2023.04.041. Epub 2023 May 24.
5
A single value of high-sensitive troponin T below the limit of detection is not enough for ruling out non ST elevation myocardial infarction in the emergency department.在急诊科,单次高敏肌钙蛋白T值低于检测下限不足以排除非ST段抬高型心肌梗死。
Clin Biochem. 2016 Oct;49(15):1113-1117. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2016.05.021. Epub 2016 May 24.
6
Is high-sensitivity troponin, alone or in combination with copeptin, sensitive enough for ruling out NSTEMI in very early presenters at admission? A post hoc analysis performed in emergency departments.高敏肌钙蛋白单独或与 copeptin 联合应用,对于入院时极早期就诊的患者,其用于排除 NSTEMI 的敏感性是否足够?一项在急诊科进行的事后分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 16;9(6):e023994. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023994.
7
Adding stress biomarkers to high-sensitivity cardiac troponin for rapid non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction rule-out protocols.将应激生物标志物添加到高敏心肌肌钙蛋白中,用于快速排除非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死的方案。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2022 Mar 16;11(3):201-212. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuab124.
8
Novel Criteria for the Observe-Zone of the ESC 0/1h-hs-cTnT Algorithm.ESC 0/1h-hs-cTnT 算法观测区的新标准。
Circulation. 2021 Sep 7;144(10):773-787. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.052982. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
9
High-sensitivity troponin assays for early rule-out of acute myocardial infarction in people with acute chest pain: a systematic review and economic evaluation.用于急性胸痛患者早期排除急性心肌梗死的高敏肌钙蛋白检测:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 May;25(33):1-276. doi: 10.3310/hta25330.
10
Glucose and high-sensitivity troponin T predict a low risk of major adverse cardiac events in emergency department chest pain patients.葡萄糖和高敏肌钙蛋白 T 可预测急诊科胸痛患者发生主要不良心脏事件的低风险。
Scand Cardiovasc J. 2021 Dec;55(6):354-361. doi: 10.1080/14017431.2021.1987512. Epub 2021 Oct 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of sex-specific 0-h high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T thresholds for the risk stratification of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.评估非ST段抬高型心肌梗死风险分层的性别特异性0小时高敏心肌肌钙蛋白T阈值
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2025 Apr 17;63(7):1443-1452. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2024-1118. Print 2025 Jun 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Healthcare cost burden of acute chest pain presentations.急性胸痛发作的医疗费用负担。
Emerg Med J. 2023 Jun;40(6):437-443. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2022-212674. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
2
A Closer Look at the HEART Score.深入剖析HEART评分
Cardiol Res. 2022 Oct;13(5):255-263. doi: 10.14740/cr1432. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
3
Health outcomes in people 2 years after surviving hospitalisation with COVID-19: a longitudinal cohort study.COVID-19 住院幸存者 2 年后的健康结局:一项纵向队列研究。
Lancet Respir Med. 2022 Sep;10(9):863-876. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(22)00126-6. Epub 2022 May 11.
4
2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR Guideline for the Evaluation and Diagnosis of Chest Pain: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR 胸痛评估与诊断指南:执行摘要:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会联合临床实践指南委员会的报告。
Circulation. 2021 Nov 30;144(22):e368-e454. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001030. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
5
Indirect comparison of TIMI, HEART and GRACE for predicting major cardiovascular events in patients admitted to the emergency department with acute chest pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.系统评价和荟萃分析:比较 TIMI、HEART 和 GRACE 评分预测急诊科因急性胸痛入院的患者发生主要心血管事件的能力。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 18;11(8):e048356. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048356.
6
Diagnostic accuracy of the HEART Pathway and EDACS-ADP when combined with a 0-hour/1-hour hs-cTnT protocol for assessment of acute chest pain patients.HEART 评分和 EDACS-ADP 与 0 小时/1 小时 hs-cTnT 方案联合用于评估急性胸痛患者的诊断准确性。
Emerg Med J. 2021 Nov;38(11):808-813. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-210833. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
7
Derivation and Validation of a 4-Level Clinical Pretest Probability Score for Suspected Pulmonary Embolism to Safely Decrease Imaging Testing.疑似肺栓塞临床预测试验概率评分 4 级模型的推导与验证,有助于安全减少影像学检查。
JAMA Cardiol. 2021 Jun 1;6(6):669-677. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.0064.
8
Single vs Serial Measurements of Cardiac Troponin Level in the Evaluation of Patients in the Emergency Department With Suspected Acute Myocardial Infarction.单一与连续测量心脏肌钙蛋白水平在急诊科疑似急性心肌梗死患者评估中的比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2037930. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.37930.
9
Trends and challenges of emergency and acute care in Chinese mainland: 2005-2017.中国大陆急诊与急性护理的趋势及挑战:2005 - 2017年
World J Emerg Med. 2021;12(1):5-11. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2021.01.001.
10
How to use imperfect tests for COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) to make clinical decisions.如何利用针对2019冠状病毒病(严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2)的不完善检测来做出临床决策。
Med J Aust. 2021 Feb;214(2):69-73.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50907. Epub 2021 Jan 7.