• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

疑似肺栓塞临床预测试验概率评分 4 级模型的推导与验证,有助于安全减少影像学检查。

Derivation and Validation of a 4-Level Clinical Pretest Probability Score for Suspected Pulmonary Embolism to Safely Decrease Imaging Testing.

机构信息

Emergency Department, CHU Angers, Institut Mitovasc UMR (CNRS 6015-INSERM 1083), UNIV Angers, F-CRIN INNOVTE, Angers, France.

Emergency Department, CHU Angers, Angers, France.

出版信息

JAMA Cardiol. 2021 Jun 1;6(6):669-677. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.0064.

DOI:10.1001/jamacardio.2021.0064
PMID:33656522
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7931139/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

In patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE), overuse of diagnostic imaging is an important point of concern.

OBJECTIVE

To derive and validate a 4-level pretest probability rule (4-Level Pulmonary Embolism Clinical Probability Score [4PEPS]) that makes it possible to rule out PE solely on clinical criteria and optimized D-dimer measurement to safely decrease imaging testing for suspected PE.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This study included consecutive outpatients suspected of having PE from US and European emergency departments. Individual data from 3 merged management studies (n = 11 114; overall prevalence of PE, 11%) were used for the derivation cohort and internal validation cohort. The external validation cohorts were taken from 2 independent studies, the first with a high PE prevalence (n = 1548; prevalence, 21.5%) and the second with a moderate PE prevalence (n = 1669; prevalence, 11.7%). A prior definition of pretest probability target values to achieve a posttest probability less than 2% was used on the basis of the negative likelihood ratios of D-dimer. Data were collected from January 2003 to April 2016, and data were analyzed from June 2018 to August 2019.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The rate of PE diagnosed during the initial workup or during follow-up and the rate of imaging testing.

RESULTS

Of the 5588 patients in the derivation cohort, 3441 (61.8%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 52 (18.5) years. The 4PEPS comprises 13 clinical variables scored from -2 to 5. It results in the following strategy: (1) very low probability of PE if 4PEPS is less than 0: PE ruled out without testing; (2) low probability of PE if 4PEPS is 0 to 5: PE ruled out if D-dimer level is less than 1.0 μg/mL; (3) moderate probability of PE if 4PEPS is 6 to 12: PE ruled out if D-dimer level is less than the age-adjusted cutoff value; (4) high probability of PE if 4PEPS is greater than 12: PE ruled out by imaging without preceding D-dimer test. In the first and the second external validation cohorts, the area under the receiver operator characteristic curves were 0.79 (95% CI, 0.76 to 0.82) and 0.78 (95% CI, 0.74 to 0.81), respectively. The false-negative testing rates if the 4PEPS strategy had been applied were 0.71% (95% CI, 0.37 to 1.23) and 0.89% (95% CI, 0.53 to 1.49), respectively. The absolute reductions in imaging testing were -22% (95% CI, -26 to -19) and -19% (95% CI, -22 to -16) in the first and second external validation cohorts, respectively. The 4PEPS strategy compared favorably with all recent strategies in terms of imaging testing.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The 4PEPS strategy may lead to a substantial and safe reduction in imaging testing for patients with suspected PE. It should now be tested in a formal outcome study.

摘要

重要性

在疑似肺栓塞(PE)患者中,过度使用诊断性影像学检查是一个重要的关注点。

目的

制定并验证一个 4 级预测概率规则(4-Level Pulmonary Embolism Clinical Probability Score [4PEPS]),该规则可仅根据临床标准和优化的 D-二聚体测量结果排除 PE,从而安全减少疑似 PE 的影像学检查。

设计、地点和参与者:这项研究纳入了来自美国和欧洲急诊科的连续疑似患有 PE 的门诊患者。来自 3 项合并管理研究的个体数据(n = 11 114;PE 的总体患病率为 11%)用于推导队列和内部验证队列。外部验证队列来自 2 项独立研究,其中第一项研究的 PE 患病率较高(n = 1548;患病率为 21.5%),第二项研究的 PE 患病率中等(n = 1669;患病率为 11.7%)。根据 D-二聚体的负似然比,采用预先定义的预测概率目标值来排除检测后概率小于 2%。数据收集于 2003 年 1 月至 2016 年 4 月,数据分析于 2018 年 6 月至 2019 年 8 月进行。

主要结果和措施

在初始检查或随访期间诊断为 PE 的比例以及影像学检查的比例。

结果

在推导队列的 5588 名患者中,3441 名(61.8%)为女性,平均(SD)年龄为 52(18.5)岁。4PEPS 包含 13 个从-2 到 5 分的临床变量。它产生了以下策略:(1)如果 4PEPS 小于 0,则 PE 的可能性非常低:如果 D-二聚体水平小于 1.0μg/mL,则无需检测即可排除 PE;(2)如果 4PEPS 为 0 至 5,则 PE 的可能性较低:如果 D-二聚体水平小于年龄调整后的临界值,则排除 PE;(3)如果 4PEPS 为 6 至 12,则 PE 的可能性为中度:如果 D-二聚体水平小于年龄调整的临界值,则排除 PE;(4)如果 4PEPS 大于 12,则 PE 的可能性较高:如果没有事先进行 D-二聚体检测,则通过影像学检查排除 PE。在第一个和第二个外部验证队列中,受试者工作特征曲线下的面积分别为 0.79(95%CI,0.76 至 0.82)和 0.78(95%CI,0.74 至 0.81)。如果应用 4PEPS 策略,假阴性检测率分别为 0.71%(95%CI,0.37 至 1.23)和 0.89%(95%CI,0.53 至 1.49)。在第一个和第二个外部验证队列中,影像学检查的绝对减少率分别为-22%(95%CI,-26 至-19)和-19%(95%CI,-22 至-16)。就影像学检查而言,4PEPS 策略与最近的所有策略相比均具有优势。

结论和相关性

4PEPS 策略可能会导致疑似 PE 患者的影像学检查大幅减少,且安全。现在应在正式的结局研究中进行检验。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67b7/7931139/0e71dbfb056f/jamacardiol-e210064-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67b7/7931139/0e71dbfb056f/jamacardiol-e210064-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67b7/7931139/0e71dbfb056f/jamacardiol-e210064-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Derivation and Validation of a 4-Level Clinical Pretest Probability Score for Suspected Pulmonary Embolism to Safely Decrease Imaging Testing.疑似肺栓塞临床预测试验概率评分 4 级模型的推导与验证,有助于安全减少影像学检查。
JAMA Cardiol. 2021 Jun 1;6(6):669-677. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.0064.
2
Performance of the 4-Level Pulmonary Embolism Clinical Probability Score (4PEPS) in the diagnostic management of pulmonary embolism: An external validation study.4 级肺栓塞临床可能性评分(4PEPS)在肺栓塞诊断管理中的表现:一项外部验证研究。
Thromb Res. 2023 Nov;231:65-75. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2023.09.010. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
3
Age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff levels to rule out pulmonary embolism: the ADJUST-PE study.年龄校正 D-二聚体界值排除肺栓塞:ADJUST-PE 研究。
JAMA. 2014 Mar 19;311(11):1117-24. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.2135.
4
Pulmonary embolism risk stratification: external validation of the 4-level Clinical Pretest Probability Score (4PEPS).肺栓塞风险分层:4级临床预检概率评分(4PEPS)的外部验证
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2024 Feb 15;8(1):102348. doi: 10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102348. eCollection 2024 Jan.
5
Comparison of the safety and efficacy of YEARS, PEGeD, 4PEPS or the sole item "PE is the most likely diagnosis" strategies for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: post-hoc analysis of two European cohort studies.急诊科中 YEARS、PEGeD、4PEPS 或单一项目“PE 是最可能的诊断”策略对肺栓塞诊断的安全性和有效性比较:两项欧洲队列研究的事后分析
Eur J Emerg Med. 2022 Oct 1;29(5):341-347. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000967. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
6
Excluding pulmonary embolism at the bedside without diagnostic imaging: management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism presenting to the emergency department by using a simple clinical model and d-dimer.床旁无需诊断性影像学检查排除肺栓塞:应用简单临床模型和D-二聚体对急诊科疑似肺栓塞患者的管理
Ann Intern Med. 2001 Jul 17;135(2):98-107. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-135-2-200107170-00010.
7
Outcomes of high pretest probability patients undergoing d-dimer testing for pulmonary embolism: a pilot study.对肺栓塞进行D-二聚体检测的高预测试验概率患者的结果:一项试点研究。
J Emerg Med. 2008 Nov;35(4):373-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.08.070. Epub 2008 Mar 17.
8
Effect of a Diagnostic Strategy Using an Elevated and Age-Adjusted D-Dimer Threshold on Thromboembolic Events in Emergency Department Patients With Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: A Randomized Clinical Trial.采用升高和年龄校正的 D-二聚体阈值的诊断策略对疑似肺栓塞急诊科患者的血栓栓塞事件的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2021 Dec 7;326(21):2141-2149. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.20750.
9
Is stand-alone D-dimer testing safe to rule out acute pulmonary embolism?单独进行 D-二聚体检测排除急性肺栓塞安全吗?
J Thromb Haemost. 2017 Feb;15(2):323-328. doi: 10.1111/jth.13574. Epub 2016 Dec 24.
10
Assessing clinical probability of pulmonary embolism: prospective validation of the simplified Geneva score.评估肺栓塞的临床可能性:简化的日内瓦评分的前瞻性验证。
J Thromb Haemost. 2017 Sep;15(9):1764-1769. doi: 10.1111/jth.13770. Epub 2017 Aug 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Testosterone Therapy as an Isolated Risk Factor for Venous Thrombosis: A Case Report.睾酮治疗作为静脉血栓形成的独立危险因素:一例报告
Cureus. 2024 Jul 1;16(7):e63611. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63611. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Revision of Clinical Pre-Test Probability Scores in Hospitalized Patients with Pulmonary Embolism and SARS-CoV-2 Infection.住院肺栓塞合并新型冠状病毒肺炎患者临床预测试验概率评分的修订
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jan 10;24(1):18. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2401018. eCollection 2023 Jan.
3
Pulmonary embolism risk stratification: external validation of the 4-level Clinical Pretest Probability Score (4PEPS).
肺栓塞风险分层:4级临床预检概率评分(4PEPS)的外部验证
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2024 Feb 15;8(1):102348. doi: 10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102348. eCollection 2024 Jan.
4
ERS International Congress 2023: highlights from the Pulmonary Vascular Diseases Assembly.2023年欧洲呼吸学会国际大会:肺血管疾病研讨会亮点
ERJ Open Res. 2024 Feb 26;10(1). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00847-2023. eCollection 2024 Jan.
5
The History of Diagnosing Venous Thromboembolism.诊断静脉血栓栓塞症的历史。
Semin Thromb Hemost. 2024 Jul;50(5):739-750. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1779484. Epub 2024 Feb 19.
6
Contemporary approaches to pulmonary embolism diagnosis: a clinical review.肺栓塞诊断的当代方法:临床综述
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2024 Jun;11(2):127-135. doi: 10.15441/ceem.23.157. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
7
High and intermediate risk pulmonary embolism in the ICU.重症监护病房中的高危和中危肺栓塞
Intensive Care Med. 2024 Feb;50(2):195-208. doi: 10.1007/s00134-023-07275-6. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
8
Turning radiology reports into epidemiological data to track seasonal pulmonary infections and the COVID-19 pandemic.将放射学报告转化为流行病学数据,以追踪季节性肺部感染和 COVID-19 大流行。
Eur Radiol. 2024 Jun;34(6):3624-3634. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10424-6. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
9
Evaluation and Recalibration of Risk-Stratified Pancreatoduodenectomy Drain Fluid Amylase Removal Criteria.风险分层胰十二指肠切除术引流液淀粉酶清除标准的评估和重新校准。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Dec;27(12):2806-2814. doi: 10.1007/s11605-023-05863-x. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
10
Derivation of a HEAR Pathway for Emergency Department Chest Pain Patients to Safely Avoid a Second Troponin Test.急诊科胸痛患者安全避免二次肌钙蛋白检测的HEAR路径推导
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Oct 16;13(20):3217. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13203217.