Kowalski Jakub, Rylska Dorota, Januszewicz Bartłomiej, Konieczny Bartlomiej, Cichomski Michal, Matinlinna Jukka P, Radwanski Mateusz, Sokolowski Jerzy, Lukomska-Szymanska Monika
Department of General Dentistry, Medical University of Lodz, 92-213 Lodz, Poland.
Institute of Materials Science and Engineering, Lodz University of Technology, 1/15 Stefanowskiego St., 90-924 Lodz, Poland.
Materials (Basel). 2023 Oct 10;16(20):6624. doi: 10.3390/ma16206624.
Metals subjected to the oral environment are prone to corrosion over time and this can be harmful. Metallic restoration components such as dental subgingival implant abutments are exposed to pH changes and different ions while in contact with saliva. The aim of the study was to evaluate the corrosion resistance of titanium dental implant abutments and to compare and contrast the surface characteristics of these alloys before and after corrosion. The corrosion examination (E, j, OCP, polarization curve) of two implant abutments (TiDesign EV, Astra Tech, Dentsply, York, PA, USA; Individual Titanium Abutment, Apollo Implants Components, Pabianice, Poland) was performed in 0.9% NaCl and 5% HCl. Moreover, specimens were investigated using SEM-EDS before and after the corrosion test. The value of j in NaCl was higher for Astra (34.2 × 10 ± 2.5 × 10 A/cm) than for Apollo (8.8 × 10 ± 2.5 × 10 A/cm). Whereas, in HCl, the opposite relationship was observed (Astra 2.9 × 10 ± 0.8 × 10 A/cm and Apollo 62.7 × 10 ± 9.3 × 10 A/cm). An average reactive anodic current density in NaCl for Astra amounted up to ~0.2 × 10-1.5 × 10 A/cm, while for Apollo-up to ~3.3-9.7 × 10 A/cm. The composition of both alloys after corrosion in NaCl demonstrated some changes: a decrease in the Ti, and Al and an increase in oxygen content. Hence, both alloys after corrosion in HCl demonstrated some minor changes in the elemental composition. Based on the results it can be concluded that: 1. Astra and Apollo abutments revealed good corrosion resistance and a passivation layer on the surface. 2. Apollo abutments exhibited better corrosion resistance in a neutral environment, suggesting that Astra abutments were found to be more resistant to corrosion in an acidic medium.
长期处于口腔环境中的金属容易发生腐蚀,这可能是有害的。诸如牙种植体龈下基台等金属修复部件在与唾液接触时会暴露于pH值变化和不同离子中。本研究的目的是评估钛牙种植体基台的耐腐蚀性,并比较和对比这些合金在腐蚀前后的表面特性。在0.9%氯化钠溶液和5%盐酸中对两种种植体基台(美国宾夕法尼亚州约克市登士柏公司的TiDesign EV、Astra Tech;波兰帕比亚尼采市阿波罗种植体部件公司的个性化钛基台)进行了腐蚀检测(E、j、开路电位、极化曲线)。此外,在腐蚀试验前后使用扫描电子显微镜-能谱仪对样本进行了研究。在氯化钠溶液中,Astra基台的j值(34.2×10±2.5×10 A/cm²)高于阿波罗基台(8.8×10±2.5×10 A/cm²)。而在盐酸中,观察到相反的关系(Astra基台为2.9×10±0.8×10 A/cm²,阿波罗基台为62.7×10±9.3×10 A/cm²)。Astra基台在氯化钠溶液中的平均活性阳极电流密度高达约0.2×10⁻¹.⁵×10 A/cm²,而阿波罗基台高达约3.3⁻9.7×10 A/cm²。两种合金在氯化钠溶液中腐蚀后的成分都有一些变化:钛、铝含量减少,氧含量增加。因此,两种合金在盐酸中腐蚀后元素组成也有一些微小变化。基于这些结果可以得出结论:1. Astra和阿波罗基台显示出良好的耐腐蚀性,且表面有钝化层。2. 阿波罗基台在中性环境中表现出更好的耐腐蚀性,表明Astra基台在酸性介质中更耐腐蚀。