• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直接粘结技术中,金属和陶瓷托槽的剪切粘结强度取决于蚀刻方案

Shear Bond Strength of Metal and Ceramic Brackets Depending on Etching Protocol in Direct Bonding Technique.

作者信息

Nawrocka Agnieszka, Nowak Joanna, Sauro Salvatore, Hardan Louis, Bourgi Rim, Lukomska-Szymanska Monika

机构信息

Department of General Dentistry, Medical University of Lodz, 251 Pomorska St., 92-213 Lodz, Poland.

University Laboratory of Materials Research, Medical University of Lodz, Pomorska 251, 92-213 Lodz, Poland.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2023 Oct 15;16(20):6697. doi: 10.3390/ma16206697.

DOI:10.3390/ma16206697
PMID:37895679
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10608197/
Abstract

Successful orthodontic therapy, apart from a proper treatment plan, depends on optimal bracket-enamel adhesion. Among numerous factors affecting adhesion, the type of bracket and preparation of the tooth's surface are crucial. The aim of this study was to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of metal and ceramic brackets to the enamel's surface using direct bonding. Forty extracted human premolars were divided into four groups according to the etching method (etch-and-rinse and self-etch) and bracket type. The SBS and adhesive remnant index (ARI) were determined. The ceramic brackets achieved the highest SBS values both in the self-etch (SE) and etch-and-rinse (ER) protocols. Higher SBS values for ceramic and metallic brackets were found in the ER protocol. In all tested groups, the achieved SBS value was satisfactory to withstand orthodontic and occlusal forces. There was no significant difference in the ARI score between study groups ( = 0.71). The fracture occurred between the bracket base and adhesive material in both types of brackets, which decreased the risk of enamel damage during debonding.

摘要

成功的正畸治疗,除了要有合适的治疗方案外,还取决于最佳的托槽-牙釉质黏附。在众多影响黏附的因素中,托槽类型和牙齿表面处理至关重要。本研究的目的是通过直接黏结比较金属托槽和陶瓷托槽与牙釉质表面的剪切粘结强度(SBS)。根据酸蚀方法(酸蚀冲洗法和自酸蚀法)和托槽类型,将40颗拔除的人类前磨牙分为四组。测定了SBS和黏附剂残留指数(ARI)。在自酸蚀(SE)和酸蚀冲洗(ER)方案中,陶瓷托槽均获得了最高的SBS值。在ER方案中,陶瓷和金属托槽的SBS值更高。在所有测试组中,所获得的SBS值足以承受正畸力和咬合力。研究组之间的ARI评分无显著差异(=0.71)。两种类型的托槽在托槽底座和黏结材料之间均发生断裂,这降低了去粘结过程中牙釉质损伤的风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/421a/10608197/02aa983e4870/materials-16-06697-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/421a/10608197/a38eece55d50/materials-16-06697-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/421a/10608197/39a97ad95bf1/materials-16-06697-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/421a/10608197/59b698dd4f0a/materials-16-06697-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/421a/10608197/d89674902e3d/materials-16-06697-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/421a/10608197/dbc9189df806/materials-16-06697-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/421a/10608197/02aa983e4870/materials-16-06697-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/421a/10608197/a38eece55d50/materials-16-06697-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/421a/10608197/39a97ad95bf1/materials-16-06697-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/421a/10608197/59b698dd4f0a/materials-16-06697-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/421a/10608197/d89674902e3d/materials-16-06697-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/421a/10608197/dbc9189df806/materials-16-06697-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/421a/10608197/02aa983e4870/materials-16-06697-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Shear Bond Strength of Metal and Ceramic Brackets Depending on Etching Protocol in Direct Bonding Technique.直接粘结技术中,金属和陶瓷托槽的剪切粘结强度取决于蚀刻方案
Materials (Basel). 2023 Oct 15;16(20):6697. doi: 10.3390/ma16206697.
2
Shear bond strength and debonding characteristics of metal and ceramic brackets bonded with conventional acid-etch and self-etch primer systems: An in-vivo study.采用传统酸蚀和自酸蚀底漆系统粘结的金属和陶瓷托槽的剪切粘结强度及脱粘特性:一项体内研究。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2016 Feb 1;8(1):e38-43. doi: 10.4317/jced.52658. eCollection 2016 Feb.
3
Shear bond strength of two 2-step etch-and-rinse adhesives when bonding ceramic brackets to bovine enamel.将陶瓷托槽粘结到牛牙釉质上时两种两步酸蚀冲洗粘结剂的剪切粘结强度。
Int Orthod. 2017 Sep;15(3):388-404. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2017.06.003. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
4
The Influence of Indirect Bonding Technique on Adhesion of Orthodontic Brackets and Post-Debonding Enamel Integrity-An In Vitro Study.间接粘结技术对正畸托槽粘结及脱粘后釉质完整性的影响——一项体外研究
Materials (Basel). 2023 Nov 17;16(22):7202. doi: 10.3390/ma16227202.
5
bond strengths post thermal and fatigue load cycling of sapphire brackets bonded with self-etch primer and evaluation of enamel damage.使用自酸蚀底漆粘结的蓝宝石托槽在热循环和疲劳加载循环后的粘结强度以及釉质损伤评估
J Clin Exp Dent. 2020 Jan 1;12(1):e22-e30. doi: 10.4317/medoral.56444. eCollection 2020 Jan.
6
Effects of a fluoride-containing casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate complex on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.含氟酪蛋白磷酸肽-无定形磷酸钙复合物对正畸托槽粘结强度的影响。
Eur J Orthod. 2012 Apr;34(2):193-7. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq183. Epub 2011 Feb 11.
7
Bond Strength of Metallic or Ceramic Orthodontic Brackets to Enamel, Acrylic, or Porcelain Surfaces.金属或陶瓷正畸托槽与牙釉质、丙烯酸或瓷表面的粘结强度。
Materials (Basel). 2020 Nov 17;13(22):5197. doi: 10.3390/ma13225197.
8
Effects of one-step orthodontic adhesive on microleakage and bracket bond strength: An in vitro comparative study.一步法正畸粘接剂对微渗漏和托槽粘接强度的影响:体外对比研究。
Int Orthod. 2020 Jun;18(2):366-373. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2020.01.010. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
9
Influence of phototherapy on bond strength and failure modes of enamel bonded to ceramic and metallic brackets with different surface treatment regimes.光疗对不同表面处理方案的陶瓷和金属托槽与牙釉质粘结强度和破坏模式的影响。
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2019 Jun;26:214-217. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2019.03.021. Epub 2019 Mar 30.
10
Effects of enamel sealing on shear bond strength and the adhesive remnant index : Study of three fluoride-releasing adhesives in combination with metal and ceramic brackets.釉质封闭对剪切粘结强度和粘结剂残留指数的影响:三种含氟粘结剂与金属及陶瓷托槽联合应用的研究
J Orofac Orthop. 2017 Jan;78(1):1-10. doi: 10.1007/s00056-016-0065-x. Epub 2016 Nov 28.

引用本文的文献

1
The Influence of Resin Infiltration on the Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.树脂渗透对正畸托槽剪切粘结强度的影响:一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Funct Biomater. 2025 Jan 17;16(1):32. doi: 10.3390/jfb16010032.
2
Shear Bond Strength of Ceramic Brackets on Enamel Conditioned With CO2 Laser.二氧化碳激光预处理牙釉质后陶瓷托槽的剪切粘结强度
Cureus. 2024 Oct 31;16(10):e72761. doi: 10.7759/cureus.72761. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
Metallic vs Ceramic Bracket Failures After 12 Months of Treatment: A Prospective Clinical Trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Corrosion of orthodontic brackets: qualitative and quantitative surface analysis.正畸托槽的腐蚀:定性和定量表面分析
Angle Orthod. 2022 May 23;92(5):661-8. doi: 10.2319/072321-584.1.
2
Bracket Failure in Orthodontic Patients: The Incidence and the Influence of Different Factors.正畸患者的托槽脱落:发生率及不同因素的影响。
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Jan 11;2022:5128870. doi: 10.1155/2022/5128870. eCollection 2022.
3
Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Brackets Bonded with self Etch Primer/Adhesive and Conventional Etch/Primer and Adhesive System.
金属托槽与陶瓷托槽在治疗 12 个月后的失败率:一项前瞻性临床试验。
Int Dent J. 2024 Dec;74(6):1371-1377. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2024.04.023. Epub 2024 May 13.
自酸蚀底漆/粘合剂与传统酸蚀/底漆及粘合剂系统粘结托槽的剪切粘结强度对比评估
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021 Nov;13(Suppl 2):S1168-S1173. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_412_21. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
4
Traditional Microscopic Techniques Employed in Dental Adhesion Research-Applications and Protocols of Specimen Preparation.传统的显微镜技术在牙科黏附研究中的应用-标本制备的应用和方案。
Biosensors (Basel). 2021 Oct 21;11(11):408. doi: 10.3390/bios11110408.
5
Physical and chemical mechanisms involved in adhesion of orthodontic bonding composites: in vitro evaluations.正畸粘接复合材料黏附的物理和化学机制:体外评估。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Jul 16;21(1):350. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01715-9.
6
Bond Strength of Metallic or Ceramic Orthodontic Brackets to Enamel, Acrylic, or Porcelain Surfaces.金属或陶瓷正畸托槽与牙釉质、丙烯酸或瓷表面的粘结强度。
Materials (Basel). 2020 Nov 17;13(22):5197. doi: 10.3390/ma13225197.
7
Orthodontic Bonding: Review of the Literature.正畸粘结:文献综述
Int J Dent. 2020 Jul 14;2020:8874909. doi: 10.1155/2020/8874909. eCollection 2020.
8
Effect of thermal cycling on temperature changes and bond strength in different test specimens.热循环对不同测试样本温度变化及粘结强度的影响。
Biomater Investig Dent. 2020 Jan 29;7(1):16-24. doi: 10.1080/26415275.2019.1709470. eCollection 2020.
9
Effects of one-step orthodontic adhesive on microleakage and bracket bond strength: An in vitro comparative study.一步法正畸粘接剂对微渗漏和托槽粘接强度的影响:体外对比研究。
Int Orthod. 2020 Jun;18(2):366-373. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2020.01.010. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
10
The Indirect Bonding Technique in Orthodontics-A Narrative Literature Review.正畸学中的间接粘结技术——一篇叙述性文献综述
Materials (Basel). 2020 Feb 22;13(4):986. doi: 10.3390/ma13040986.