Frączek Tadeusz, Prusak Rafał, Michalski Jerzy, Skuza Zbigniew, Ogórek Marzena
Department of Materials Engineering, Faculty of Production Engineering and Materials Technology, Czestochowa University of Technology, 42-201 Czestochowa, Poland.
Department of Production, Faculty of Production Engineering and Materials Technology, Czestochowa University of Technology, 42-201 Czestochowa, Poland.
Materials (Basel). 2023 Oct 16;16(20):6708. doi: 10.3390/ma16206708.
The aim of this study was to determine the impact of the heating rate of steel balls made of AISI 52100 alloy steel on the kinetics and efficiency of the gas nitriding process when carried out using a chemical reactor with precise thermo-gravimetric measurements, which allowed for changes in sample mass during heating and nitriding to be monitored with an accuracy of 50 µg. In the chemical reactor, the examined alloy steel was subjected to a heating process at the selected nitriding temperature of 590 °C. Two heating variants were used: the first variant relied on heating to the nitriding temperature with different rates-1 °C per minute, 2 °C per minute, 5 °C per minute and 10 °C per minute, respectively-whereas the second variant relied on the fast-25 °C per minute-heating of treated specimens to a temperature of 475 °C, at which, the nitrogenous potential of the atmosphere promotes faster nitrogen diffusion deep into the nitrided substrate, followed by reheating up to the nitriding temperature at different rates: 1 °C per minute, 2 °C per minute, 5 °C per minute, and 10 °C per minute, respectively. To evaluate the impact of heating rate kinetics and effectiveness during nitriding on the obtained surface layer quality, we investigated the phase composition, microhardness distribution, and thickness of the obtained diffusion layers. It was found that heating to a temperature of 475 °C in the nitriding process does not significantly affect the average mass gain of a sample. Above this temperature, within the range of nitriding temperatures, the extension of time increases the sample's mass gain. Simultaneously, it was found that the use of a constant heating rate allows for thicker nitrided layers and a greater sample hardness to be obtained. Dual-stage heating, in turn, is more effective in the context of sample mass gain per time unit.
本研究的目的是,当使用具有精确热重测量功能的化学反应器进行气体渗氮过程时,确定由AISI 52100合金钢制成的钢球的加热速率对渗氮过程动力学和效率的影响,该反应器能够以50微克的精度监测加热和渗氮过程中样品质量的变化。在化学反应器中,将受试合金钢在选定的590℃渗氮温度下进行加热过程。使用了两种加热方式:第一种方式是分别以不同速率——每分钟1℃、每分钟2℃、每分钟5℃和每分钟10℃——加热至渗氮温度,而第二种方式是将处理后的试样以每分钟25℃的快速加热至475℃,在此温度下,气氛的氮势促进氮更快地扩散到渗氮基体深处,随后再分别以每分钟1℃、每分钟2℃、每分钟5℃和每分钟10℃的不同速率重新加热至渗氮温度。为了评估渗氮过程中加热速率动力学和有效性对所得表面层质量的影响,我们研究了所得扩散层的相组成、显微硬度分布和厚度。结果发现,在渗氮过程中加热至475℃对样品的平均质量增加没有显著影响。高于此温度,在渗氮温度范围内,时间的延长会增加样品的质量增加。同时,发现使用恒定的加热速率可以获得更厚的渗氮层和更高的样品硬度。反过来,在单位时间内样品质量增加方面,两级加热更有效。