Suppr超能文献

掺有粉煤灰、玉米芯灰或陶瓷废料粉末的环保型砌筑砂浆

Environmentally Friendly Masonry Mortar Blended with Fly Ash, Corn Cob Ash or Ceramic Waste Powder.

作者信息

Šupić Slobodan, Malešev Mirjana, Pantić Vladan, Lukić Ivan, Radonjanin Vlastimir, Ognjanović Miloš, Broćeta Gordana

机构信息

Department of Civil Engineering and Geodesy, Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia.

Vinča, Institute of Nuclear Sciences, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2023 Oct 17;16(20):6725. doi: 10.3390/ma16206725.

Abstract

Implementing a circular approach through waste valorization in mortar production with environmentally efficient mix design is a viable pathway for relieving the ecological burden of greenhouse gas emissions, resource depletion and waste management. The main objective of this paper is to evaluate the feasibility of using fly ash (FA), corn cob ash (CCA), and ceramic waste powder (CWP) as supplementary cementitious materials (SCM) in cement-lime masonry mortars. As part of an extensive experimental study, twelve mortar mixtures were made: three reference and nine blended, with mixing ratios of 1:1:5, 1:0.7:4.2, and 1:1:4 ((cement + SCM)/lime/sand), by volume. The examined properties include workability, compressive and flexural strengths, dry bulk density, capillary water absorption, adhesive bond strength, and water vapor permeability. The compressive and flexural strengths of tested mortars were notably impaired, with reductions of up to 60%, while the capillary water absorption coefficient rose by 100% compared to the reference values. The adhesive bond strength of some blended mortars exceeded the strength of the reference mortars. Nevertheless, all blended mortars fulfilled the requirements for general-purpose mortars, while the majority met the criteria for structural masonry applications. In addition, a performance-based index and weighting triangle were used for the comparison and ranking of all analyzed mortar mixtures. The findings of this study may herald a novel use of FA, CCA, and CWP as more eco-friendly binding materials in contemporary construction leading to the reduction in the process's carbon footprint, the improvement in cost efficiency, and the mitigation of the detrimental environmental impact of waste disposal.

摘要

通过在砂浆生产中进行废物增值利用并采用环境高效的配合比设计来实施循环利用方法,是减轻温室气体排放、资源枯竭和废物管理的生态负担的可行途径。本文的主要目的是评估在水泥 - 石灰砌筑砂浆中使用粉煤灰(FA)、玉米芯灰(CCA)和陶瓷废粉(CWP)作为辅助胶凝材料(SCM)的可行性。作为广泛实验研究的一部分,制备了十二种砂浆混合物:三种基准混合物和九种混合混合物,体积比为1:1:5、1:0.7:4.2和1:1:4((水泥 + SCM)/石灰/砂)。所检测的性能包括工作性、抗压强度和抗折强度、干堆积密度、毛细吸水系数、粘结强度和水蒸气渗透性。与基准值相比,测试砂浆的抗压强度和抗折强度显著降低,降幅高达60%,而毛细吸水系数上升了100%。一些混合砂浆的粘结强度超过了基准砂浆的强度。尽管如此,所有混合砂浆均满足通用砂浆的要求,而大多数混合砂浆符合结构砌体应用的标准。此外,还使用了基于性能的指标和权重三角形对所有分析的砂浆混合物进行比较和排名。本研究的结果可能预示着在当代建筑中,将粉煤灰、玉米芯灰和陶瓷废粉作为更环保的粘结材料的新用途,从而减少该过程的碳足迹,提高成本效益,并减轻废物处置对环境的不利影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21be/10608085/d5f11f4e8d76/materials-16-06725-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验