Suppr超能文献

pH值和血气分析中的采样误差——三种新型动脉血采样器的评估

Sampling errors in pH and blood gas analysis--an evaluation of three new arterial blood samplers.

作者信息

Hutchison A S, Dryburgh F J, Ralston S H

出版信息

Ann Clin Biochem. 1986 May;23 ( Pt 3):329-33. doi: 10.1177/000456328602300314.

Abstract

We have tested the accuracy, acceptability and general performance of three recently-marketed samplers for arterial blood gas measurement (the Corning Arterial Blood Sampler, the Concord 'Pulsator' and the Sarstedt 'Monovette'). All three greatly reduce or eliminate the error of venous sampling, and the Corning and Sarstedt samplers eliminate the risk of dilution of the sample by excess heparin solution. A positive bias in pO2 measurement, more marked at higher levels, was demonstrated with the Concord and Sarstedt samplers, and the latter carry a slightly increased risk of cross-infection. None of the samplers completely overcame potential sampling errors.

摘要

我们已经测试了三种最近上市的用于动脉血气测量的采样器(康宁动脉血采样器、协和“脉动器”和赛多利斯“单管采血管”)的准确性、可接受性和总体性能。这三种采样器都大大减少或消除了静脉采样的误差,并且康宁和赛多利斯采样器消除了样本被过量肝素溶液稀释的风险。使用协和采样器和赛多利斯采样器时,pO2测量存在正偏差,在较高水平时更为明显,并且赛多利斯采样器存在轻微增加的交叉感染风险。没有一种采样器能完全克服潜在的采样误差。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验