分析ChatGPT针对良性和恶性皮肤肿瘤的体格检查结果生成的鉴别诊断。 - Suppr | 超能文献

相似文献

1

Analysis of ChatGPT generated differential diagnoses in response to physical exam findings for benign and malignant cutaneous neoplasms.分析ChatGPT针对良性和恶性皮肤肿瘤的体格检查结果生成的鉴别诊断。

J Am Acad Dermatol. 2024 Mar;90(3):615-616. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2023.10.040. Epub 2023 Oct 28.

2

ChatGPT versus clinician: challenging the diagnostic capabilities of artificial intelligence in dermatology.ChatGPT 与临床医生：人工智能在皮肤病学诊断能力方面的挑战。

Clin Exp Dermatol. 2024 Jun 25;49(7):707-710. doi: 10.1093/ced/llad402.

3

Assessing question characteristic influences on ChatGPT's performance and response-explanation consistency: Insights from Taiwan's Nursing Licensing Exam.评估问题特征对 ChatGPT 表现和回应解释一致性的影响：来自台湾护理执照考试的见解。

Int J Nurs Stud. 2024 May;153:104717. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104717. Epub 2024 Feb 8.

4

Chat-GPT on brain tumors: An examination of Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning's ability to provide diagnoses and treatment plans for example neuro-oncology cases.Chat-GPT 与脑肿瘤：人工智能/机器学习提供神经肿瘤学等案例诊断和治疗方案的能力评估。

Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2024 Apr;239:108238. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108238. Epub 2024 Mar 9.

5

Evaluating the performance of large language models: ChatGPT and Google Bard in generating differential diagnoses in clinicopathological conferences of neurodegenerative disorders.评估大型语言模型的性能：ChatGPT 和 Google Bard 在神经退行性疾病临床病理会议中生成鉴别诊断的能力。

Brain Pathol. 2024 May;34(3):e13207. doi: 10.1111/bpa.13207. Epub 2023 Aug 8.

6

Claude 3 Opus and ChatGPT With GPT-4 in Dermoscopic Image Analysis for Melanoma Diagnosis: Comparative Performance Analysis.用于黑色素瘤诊断的皮肤镜图像分析中Claude 3 Opus和配备GPT-4的ChatGPT：比较性能分析

JMIR Med Inform. 2024 Aug 6;12:e59273. doi: 10.2196/59273.

7

Large-Scale assessment of ChatGPT's performance in benign and malignant bone tumors imaging report diagnosis and its potential for clinical applications.ChatGPT在良性和恶性骨肿瘤影像报告诊断中的性能大规模评估及其临床应用潜力

J Bone Oncol. 2024 Jan 22;44:100525. doi: 10.1016/j.jbo.2024.100525. eCollection 2024 Feb.

8

How does artificial intelligence master urological board examinations? A comparative analysis of different Large Language Models' accuracy and reliability in the 2022 In-Service Assessment of the European Board of Urology.人工智能如何掌握泌尿外科委员会考试？2022年欧洲泌尿外科委员会在职评估中不同大语言模型准确性和可靠性的比较分析。

World J Urol. 2024 Jan 10;42(1):20. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04749-6.

9

Dermatology diagnostic accuracy is improved by artificial intelligence-generated differential diagnoses.人工智能生成的鉴别诊断提高了皮肤病学的诊断准确性。

Int J Dermatol. 2025 May;64(5):960-962. doi: 10.1111/ijd.17591. Epub 2024 Dec 30.

10

Artificial intelligence in sleep medicine: assessing the diagnostic precision of ChatGPT-4.睡眠医学中的人工智能：评估ChatGPT-4的诊断准确性

J Clin Sleep Med. 2025 Apr 23. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.11732.

引用本文的文献

1

[Large language models-hype or hope?].[大语言模型——炒作还是希望？]

Dermatologie (Heidelb). 2025 Sep 3. doi: 10.1007/s00105-025-05576-z.

2

Medical accuracy of artificial intelligence chatbots in oncology: a scoping review.人工智能聊天机器人在肿瘤学中的医学准确性：一项范围综述。

Oncologist. 2025 Apr 4;30(4). doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyaf038.

3

A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic performance comparison between generative AI and physicians.生成式人工智能与医生诊断性能比较的系统评价与荟萃分析