• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性冠状动脉综合征患者基因分型的临床应用:来自FORCE-ACS注册研究的见解

The Clinical Implementation of Genotyping in Patients with an Acute Coronary Syndrome: Insights From the FORCE-ACS Registry.

作者信息

Azzahhafi Jaouad, Broek Wout W A van den, Chan Pin Yin Dean R P P, Harmsze Ankie M, van Schaik Ron H N, Ten Berg Jurriën M

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands.

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2023 Jan-Dec;28:10742484231210704. doi: 10.1177/10742484231210704.

DOI:10.1177/10742484231210704
PMID:37899583
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Guidelines recommend prasugrel or ticagrelor for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. However, these P2Y inhibitors increase bleeding risk compared to clopidogrel. Although genotype-guided P2Y-inhibitor selection has been shown to reduce bleeding risk, data on its clinical implementation is lacking.

METHODS

The study included ACS patients receiving genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy, utilising either a point-of-care (POC) device or laboratory-based testing. We aimed to collect qualitative and quantitative data on genotyping, eligibility for de-escalation, physician adherence to genotype results, time to de-escalation and cost reduction.

RESULTS

Of the 1,530 patients included in the ACS registry from 2021 to 2023, 738 ACS patients treated with ticagrelor received a genotype test. The median turnover time of genotyping was 6.3 hours (interquartile range [IQR], 3.2-16.7), with 82.3% of the genotyping results known within 24 hours after admission. POC genotyping exhibited significantly shorter turnaround times compared to laboratory-based testing (with respective medians of 5.7 vs 47.8 hours;  < .001). Of the genotyped patients, 81.7% were eligible for de-escalation which was carried out within 24 hours in 70.9% and within 48 h in 93.0%. The time to de-escalation was significantly shorter using POC (25.4 hours) compared to laboratory-based testing (58.9 hours;  < .001). Implementing this strategy led to a reduction of €211,150.50 in medication costs.

CONCLUSIONS

CYP2C19 genotype-guided-de-escalation in an all-comers ACS population is feasible. POC genotyping leads to shorter turnaround times and quicker de-escalation. Time to de-escalation from ticagrelor to clopidogrel in noncarriers was short, with high physician adherence to genotype results.

摘要

背景

指南推荐普拉格雷或替格瑞洛用于急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者。然而,与氯吡格雷相比,这些P2Y抑制剂会增加出血风险。尽管基因分型指导的P2Y抑制剂选择已被证明可降低出血风险,但缺乏其临床应用的数据。

方法

该研究纳入了接受基因分型指导抗血小板治疗的ACS患者,采用即时检验(POC)设备或基于实验室的检测方法。我们旨在收集关于基因分型、降阶梯治疗资格、医生对基因分型结果的依从性、降阶梯治疗时间和成本降低的定性和定量数据。

结果

在2021年至2023年纳入ACS登记册的1530例患者中,738例接受替格瑞洛治疗的ACS患者进行了基因分型检测。基因分型的中位周转时间为6.3小时(四分位间距[IQR],3.2 - 16.7),82.3%的基因分型结果在入院后24小时内已知。与基于实验室的检测相比,POC基因分型的周转时间明显更短(中位数分别为5.7小时和47.8小时;<0.001)。在进行基因分型的患者中,81.7%有资格进行降阶梯治疗,其中70.9%在24小时内进行了降阶梯治疗,93.0%在48小时内进行了降阶梯治疗。与基于实验室的检测相比,使用POC进行降阶梯治疗的时间明显更短(25.4小时)(58.9小时;<0.001)。实施该策略使药物成本降低了211,150.50欧元。

结论

在所有ACS患者群体中,CYP2C19基因分型指导的降阶梯治疗是可行的。POC基因分型可缩短周转时间并加快降阶梯治疗。非携带者从替格瑞洛降阶梯至氯吡格雷的时间较短,医生对基因分型结果的依从性较高。

相似文献

1
The Clinical Implementation of Genotyping in Patients with an Acute Coronary Syndrome: Insights From the FORCE-ACS Registry.急性冠状动脉综合征患者基因分型的临床应用:来自FORCE-ACS注册研究的见解
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2023 Jan-Dec;28:10742484231210704. doi: 10.1177/10742484231210704.
2
Financial Analysis of CYP2C19 Genotyping in Patients Receiving Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Following Acute Coronary Syndrome and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.CYP2C19 基因分型在急性冠状动脉综合征和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后接受双联抗血小板治疗患者中的财务分析。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015 Jul;21(7):552-7. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2015.21.7.552.
3
Genotype-Phenotype Association and Impact on Outcomes following Guided De-Escalation of Anti-Platelet Treatment in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients: The TROPICAL-ACS Genotyping Substudy.基因型-表型相关性及其对急性冠状动脉综合征患者抗血小板治疗降级指导后的结局影响:TROPICAL-ACS 基因分型子研究。
Thromb Haemost. 2018 Sep;118(9):1656-1667. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1667337. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
4
Effect of Genotype-Guided Oral P2Y12 Inhibitor Selection vs Conventional Clopidogrel Therapy on Ischemic Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The TAILOR-PCI Randomized Clinical Trial.基因指导的口服 P2Y12 抑制剂选择与常规氯吡格雷治疗对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后缺血结局的影响:TAILOR-PCI 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2020 Aug 25;324(8):761-771. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.12443.
5
Cost-effectiveness of CYP2C19-guided antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous coronary intervention informed by real-world data.基于真实世界数据的 CYP2C19 指导的抗血小板治疗在急性冠状动脉综合征和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中的成本效益。
Pharmacogenomics J. 2020 Oct;20(5):724-735. doi: 10.1038/s41397-020-0162-5. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
6
Economic Evaluations of CYP2C19 Genotype-Guided Antiplatelet Therapy Compared to the Universal Use of Antiplatelets in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review.CYP2C19 基因指导的抗血小板治疗与急性冠状动脉综合征患者普遍使用抗血小板药物的经济学评价:系统评价。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2020 May;25(3):201-211. doi: 10.1177/1074248420902298. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
7
Cost-effectiveness of genotype-guided and dual antiplatelet therapies in acute coronary syndrome.基因型指导与双联抗血小板治疗急性冠脉综合征的成本效果分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Feb 18;160(4):221-32. doi: 10.7326/M13-1999.
8
Implementation of CYP2C19 genotyping and clinical outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention in East Asian patients treated with oral P2Y inhibitors.东亚经口 P2Y 抑制剂治疗的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者 CYP2C19 基因分型与临床结局的实施。
Thromb Res. 2023 Aug;228:85-93. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2023.05.023. Epub 2023 May 29.
9
De-escalation from Prasugrel or Ticagrelor to Clopidogrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Managed with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Updated Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者从普拉格雷或替格瑞洛降级为氯吡格雷治疗:随机临床试验的最新荟萃分析
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2022 May;22(3):287-298. doi: 10.1007/s40256-021-00504-7. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
10
Feasibility of Community Pharmacist-Initiated and Point-of-Care Genotype-Guided De-Escalation of Oral P2Y12 Inhibitors.社区药师主导的基于基因型的即时降阶梯治疗口服 P2Y12 抑制剂的可行性。
Genes (Basel). 2023 Feb 25;14(3):578. doi: 10.3390/genes14030578.

引用本文的文献

1
CYP2C19 point-of-care testing: where are we now and where should we go?CYP2C19即时检验:我们目前的状况及未来的方向?
Pharmacogenomics J. 2025 Jun 13;25(4):16. doi: 10.1038/s41397-025-00375-0.
2
Cost-effectiveness of implementing a genotype-guided de-escalation strategy in patients with acute coronary syndrome.在急性冠状动脉综合征患者中实施基因导向的降阶梯治疗策略的成本效益
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2025 May 2;11(3):230-240. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvae087.
3
Genotype-Guided Antiplatelet Therapy: JACC Review Topic of the Week.
基于基因型的抗血小板治疗:JACC 本周综述主题。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024 Sep 17;84(12):1107-1118. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.06.038.
4
Accuracy and technical characteristics of CYP2C19 point of care tests: a systematic review.基于即时检测的 CYP2C19 检测方法的准确性和技术特征:系统评价。
Pharmacogenomics. 2024;25(8-9):407-423. doi: 10.1080/14622416.2024.2392479. Epub 2024 Sep 4.