Suppr超能文献

婴儿猝死综合征与婴儿呼吸暂停的流行病学比较。

Epidemiological comparisons of sudden infant death syndrome with infant apnoea.

作者信息

Davis N, Bossung-Sweeney L, Peterson D R

出版信息

Aust Paediatr J. 1986;22 Suppl 1:29-32.

PMID:3789999
Abstract

A unique opportunity to study proven infant apnoea (PIA) and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) occurrences epidemiologically in 12 Counties in north-western Washington State during the same time period during which 180,017 live births were recorded revealed markedly dissimilar distribution patterns. The overall incidence of SIDS exceeded that of PIA by a factor of 3. Five PIA babies subsequently succumbed to SIDS. Statistical analysis reveals that these five events cannot be explained as random coincidences; they represent 3% of 163 PIA cases but only 1% of 503 SIDS occurrences. Infant apnoea is an infrequent precursor of SIDS. These results do not support the view that SIDS and infant apnoea are related conditions caused by a common underlying disorder. Aetiological models other than infant apnoea must be devised if the momentum of SIDS research is to be sustained.

摘要

在华盛顿州西北部12个县对确诊的婴儿呼吸暂停(PIA)和婴儿猝死综合征(SIDS)发病情况进行同期流行病学研究的独特机会,在记录了180,017例活产的同一时期内,揭示了明显不同的分布模式。SIDS的总体发病率超过PIA发病率3倍。5名PIA婴儿随后死于SIDS。统计分析表明,这5起事件不能解释为随机巧合;它们占163例PIA病例的3%,但仅占503例SIDS病例的1%。婴儿呼吸暂停是SIDS罕见的先兆。这些结果不支持SIDS和婴儿呼吸暂停是由共同潜在疾病引起的相关病症这一观点。如果要保持SIDS研究的势头,就必须设计出除婴儿呼吸暂停之外的病因模型。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验