Suppr超能文献

FLOT方案与CROSS方案治疗食管癌和胃癌患者的真实世界疗效

Real-World Outcomes of FLOT versus CROSS Regimens for Patients with Oesophagogastric Cancers.

作者信息

Shahnam Adel, Nindra Udit, McNamee Nicholas, Yoon Robert, Asghari Ray, Ng Weng, Karikios Deme, Wong Mark

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Westmead Hospital and Blacktown Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Department of Medical Oncology, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Gastrointest Tumors. 2023 Aug 3;10(1):19-28. doi: 10.1159/000531536. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Treatment of oesophageal (OC), gastro-oesophageal junction (GOJ), and gastric cancer (GC) includes either neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Oesophageal Cancer Followed by Surgery Study (CROSS) for OC or GOJ or perioperative 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT) for OC, GOJ, and GC adenocarcinomas. This study aims to describe the real-world outcomes of patients with GC, GOJ, and OC treated with FLOT or CROSS and identify variables associated with efficacy through exploratory analysis. We also aimed to evaluate the comparison of FLOT and CROSS for the treatment of OC and GOJ adenocarcinomas.

METHODS

This is a retrospective observational study of patients with locally advanced OC, GOJ, or GC treated with FLOT or CROSS between January 2015 and June 2021 in 5 cancer centres across Sydney, Australia. Long-rank test was used to compare survival estimated between subgroups. Hazard ratios for univariate and multivariate analyses were estimated with Cox proportional regression.

RESULTS

The study included 168 patients. The 24-month relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) for FLOT were 59% and 69%, respectively. The median RFS was 29.6 months and median OS was not reached. For CROSS, the 24-month RFS and OS were 55% and 63% with a median RFS and OS of 28.5 and 40.2 months, respectively. There was no difference in OS and RFS between the treatments. FLOT was less tolerable than CROSS with more dose reductions, treatment discontinuation, and clinically relevant grade 3 and 4 toxicity. Neutrophil lymphocyte ratio was associated with survival for both treatments.

CONCLUSION

Similar efficacy outcomes were seen in this real-world population compared to the clinical trials for FLOT and CROSS.

摘要

引言

食管癌(OC)、胃食管交界癌(GOJ)和胃癌(GC)的治疗方案包括对OC或GOJ采用新辅助放化疗(食管癌新辅助化疗后手术研究[CROSS]),或对OC、GOJ和GC腺癌采用围手术期氟尿嘧啶、亚叶酸钙、奥沙利铂和多西他赛(FLOT)方案。本研究旨在描述接受FLOT或CROSS治疗的GC、GOJ和OC患者的真实世界转归,并通过探索性分析确定与疗效相关的变量。我们还旨在评估FLOT和CROSS治疗OC和GOJ腺癌的疗效比较。

方法

这是一项对2015年1月至2021年6月期间在澳大利亚悉尼的5个癌症中心接受FLOT或CROSS治疗的局部晚期OC、GOJ或GC患者进行的回顾性观察研究。采用长秩检验比较亚组间的生存估计值。单因素和多因素分析的风险比通过Cox比例回归估计。

结果

该研究纳入了168例患者。FLOT方案的24个月无复发生存率(RFS)和总生存率(OS)分别为59%和69%。中位RFS为29.6个月,中位OS未达到。对于CROSS方案,24个月RFS和OS分别为55%和63%,中位RFS和OS分别为28.5个月和40.2个月。两种治疗方案的OS和RFS无差异。FLOT方案的耐受性低于CROSS方案,剂量减少、治疗中断以及临床相关的3级和4级毒性反应更多。中性粒细胞淋巴细胞比值与两种治疗方案的生存均相关。

结论

与FLOT和CROSS的临床试验相比,在这一真实世界人群中观察到了相似的疗效转归。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e233/10601866/c550553aa065/gat-2023-0010-0001-531536_F01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验