Suppr超能文献

局部晚期胃食管结合部腺癌新辅助放化疗或化疗后的预后。

Prognosis after neoadjuvant chemoradiation or chemotherapy for locally advanced gastro-oesophageal junctional adenocarcinoma.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Gastric and Mixed Tumor Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.

Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 2021 Nov 11;108(11):1332-1340. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab228.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Trials typically group cancers of the gastro-oesophageal junction (GOJ) with oesophageal or gastric cancer when studying neoadjuvant chemoradiation and perioperative chemotherapy, so the results may not be fully applicable to GOJ cancer. Because optimal neoadjuvant treatment for GOJ cancer remains controversial, outcomes with neoadjuvant chemoradiation versus chemotherapy for locally advanced GOJ adenocarcinoma were compared retrospectively.

METHODS

Data were collected from all patients who underwent neoadjuvant treatment followed by surgery for adenocarcinoma located at the GOJ at a single high-volume institution between 2002 and 2017. Postoperative major complications and mortality were compared between groups using Fisher's exact test. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were assessed by log rank test and multivariable Cox regression analyses. Cumulative incidence functions were used to estimate recurrence, and groups were compared using Gray's test.

RESULTS

Of 775 patients, 650 had neoadjuvant chemoradiation and 125 had chemotherapy. These groups were comparable in terms of clinical tumour and lymph node categories, although the chemoradiation group had greater proportions of white men, complete pathological response to chemotherapy, and smaller proportions of diffuse cancer, poor differentiation, and neurovascular invasion. Postoperative major complications (20.0 versus 17.6 per cent) and 30-day mortality (1.7 versus 1.6 per cent) were not significantly different between the chemoradiation and chemotherapy groups. After adjustment, type of therapy (chemoradiation versus chemotherapy) was not significantly associated with OS (hazard ratio (HR) 1.26, 95 per cent c.i. 0.96 to 1.67) or DFS (HR 1.27, 0.98 to 1.64). Type of recurrence (local, regional, or distant) did not differ after neoadjuvant chemoradiation versus chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

In patients undergoing surgical resection for locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the GOJ, OS and DFS did not differ significantly between patients who had neoadjuvant chemoradiation compared with chemotherapy.

摘要

背景

在研究新辅助放化疗和围手术期化疗时,临床试验通常将胃食管交界处(GOJ)癌症与食管或胃癌分组,因此结果可能不完全适用于 GOJ 癌症。由于 GOJ 癌症的最佳新辅助治疗仍存在争议,因此回顾性比较了新辅助放化疗与局部晚期 GOJ 腺癌化疗的结果。

方法

本研究从 2002 年至 2017 年在一家高容量机构接受新辅助治疗后接受手术治疗的 GOJ 腺癌患者中收集数据。使用 Fisher 精确检验比较两组之间的术后主要并发症和死亡率。通过对数秩检验和多变量 Cox 回归分析评估总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS)。使用累积发生率函数估计复发,并使用 Gray 检验比较组间差异。

结果

在 775 名患者中,650 名接受了新辅助放化疗,125 名接受了化疗。虽然放化疗组中白人男性比例较高、化疗完全缓解率较高、弥漫性癌症、低分化和神经血管侵犯比例较低,但两组在临床肿瘤和淋巴结分类方面具有可比性。放化疗组和化疗组的术后主要并发症(20.0%与 17.6%)和 30 天死亡率(1.7%与 1.6%)无显著差异。调整后,治疗类型(放化疗与化疗)与 OS(风险比(HR)1.26,95%置信区间(CI)0.96 至 1.67)或 DFS(HR 1.27,0.98 至 1.64)无显著相关性。新辅助放化疗与化疗后局部、区域或远处复发类型无差异。

结论

在接受手术切除局部晚期 GOJ 腺癌的患者中,新辅助放化疗与化疗相比,OS 和 DFS 无显著差异。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

5
Surgical principles for optimal treatment of esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma.食管胃交界腺癌最佳治疗的外科原则
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2019 Jun 11;3(4):390-395. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12268. eCollection 2019 Jul.
7
Survival after neoadjuvant approaches to gastroesophageal junction cancer.胃食管结合部癌新辅助治疗后的生存情况。
Gastric Cancer. 2020 Jan;23(1):175-183. doi: 10.1007/s10120-019-00980-6. Epub 2019 Jun 22.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验