Department of Psychology, Universidad a Distancia de Madrid.
Department of Psychobiology and Methodology in Behavioral Science, Campus de Somosaguas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
Psychol Assess. 2023 Nov;35(11):1030-1040. doi: 10.1037/pas0001276.
The widespread administration and multiple validations of the Fear of COVID-19 Scale (FCV-19S) in different languages have highlighted the controversy over its underlying structure and the resulting reliability index. In the present study, a meta-analysis based on structural equation modeling (MASEM) was conducted to assess the internal structure of the seven-item, 5-point Likert-type FCV-19S version, estimate an overall reliability index from the underlying model that best reflected the internal structure (one τ-equivalent factor, one congeneric factor, or two-factor models), and perform moderator analyses for the model-implied interitem correlations and estimated factor loadings. A Pearson interitem correlation matrix was obtained for 48 independent studies, from which a pooled matrix was calculated following a random-effects multivariate meta-analysis. The results from the one-stage MASEM analysis showed that the two-factor model properly fitted the pooled matrix, while the τ-equivalent and congeneric one-factor models did not. Even though, the use of a bifactor model exhibited the predominance of the general factor over the domain-specific ones. High omega coefficients were obtained for the entire scale (.91) and the psychological (.83) and physiological (.83) symptoms subscales. Moderator analyses evidenced an increase in the estimated factor loadings, as well as in the reliability of the FCV-19S, when the standard deviation of the total scores increased and when the FCV-19S was administered to specific (vs. general) populations. The FCV-19S can be therefore considered as a highly related two-factor scale whose reliability makes it suitable for applied and research purposes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
《COVID-19 恐惧量表(FCV-19S)在不同语言中的广泛应用和多次验证突出了其潜在结构和由此产生的可靠性指标的争议。在本研究中,采用基于结构方程模型(MASEM)的荟萃分析来评估七项五点 Likert 式 FCV-19S 版本的内部结构,从最能反映内部结构的基础模型中估计总体可靠性指标(一个 τ 等效因素、一个同形因素或两个因素模型),并对模型隐含的项目间相关性和估计的因子负荷进行调节分析。对 48 项独立研究的 Pearson 项目间相关矩阵进行了分析,随后对多元随机效应荟萃分析后的汇总矩阵进行了计算。单阶段 MASEM 分析的结果表明,两因素模型恰当地拟合了汇总矩阵,而 τ 等效和同形单因素模型则不恰当。尽管如此,双因素模型的使用显示出一般因素对特定领域因素的优势。整个量表(.91)和心理(.83)和生理(.83)症状分量表的 ω 系数都很高。调节分析表明,当总分的标准差增加且 FCV-19S 用于特定(而非一般)人群时,估计的因子负荷以及 FCV-19S 的可靠性都会增加。因此,可以认为 FCV-19S 是一种高度相关的两因素量表,其可靠性使其适用于应用和研究目的。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。