• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

主动脉瓣狭窄的计算机断层钙评分:二叶瓣与三叶瓣形态。

Computed tomography calcium scoring in aortic stenosis: bicuspid versus tricuspid morphology.

机构信息

Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Cardiology, Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Quebec, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Heart. 2024 Mar 22;110(8):594-602. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2023-323281.

DOI:10.1136/heartjnl-2023-323281
PMID:37903555
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

CT aortic valve calcium score (AVC) and density (AVC) thresholds have been recommended for aortic stenosis (AS) severity assessment in tricuspid aortic valve (TAV). We aimed to compare AVC and AVC in bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) versus TAV.

METHODS

Retrospective single-centre study of patients with echocardiographic AS-severity and CT-AVC assessments within 6 months, and left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50%, all referred for clinical AS evaluation.Severe AS was defined as aortic valve area (AVA) ≤1 cm or indexed AVA ≤0.6cm/m plus mean gradient ≥40 mm Hg or peak velocity ≥4 m/s. AVC was assessed by Agatston method.

RESULTS

Of the 1957 patients, 328 had BAV and 1629 had TAV, age 65±11 vs 80±9 years (p<0.001), men 65% vs 56% (p=0.006), respectively. BAV morphology was associated with higher AVC and AVC independent of age, comorbidities and AS severity (p<0.001) in men only (sex and BAV interaction p<0.001). In patients with severe AS, mean AVC and AVC were higher in BAV-men than that in TAV-men (both p<0.001), but similar in BAV-women and TAV-women (both p≥0.4). Such patterns remained the same after adjustment for clinical covariates and AS severity. Best thresholds for severe AS diagnosis in BAV-men were 2916 AU by AVC and 600 AU/cm by AVC which were higher than the guideline-recommended thresholds, while thresholds in BAV-women (1036 AU and 282 AU/cm) were similar to guideline-recommended ones.

CONCLUSION

Valve calcification in AS differs according to valve morphology and sex. BAV-men with severe AS exhibit greater AVC and AVC than TAV-men. This presents a diagnostic challenge to the current guidelines, which needs confirmation in larger studies.

摘要

目的

CT 主动脉瓣钙评分(AVC)和密度(AVC)阈值已被推荐用于三尖瓣主动脉瓣(TAV)的主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)严重程度评估。我们旨在比较二叶式主动脉瓣(BAV)与三叶式主动脉瓣(TAV)的 AVC 和 AVC。

方法

回顾性单中心研究,纳入了在 6 个月内接受超声心动图 AS 严重程度和 CT-AVC 评估以及左心室射血分数≥50%的患者,所有患者均因临床 AS 评估而转诊。严重 AS 的定义为主动脉瓣口面积(AVA)≤1cm 或指数化 AVA≤0.6cm/m 加上平均梯度≥40mmHg 或峰值速度≥4m/s。AVC 通过 Agatston 方法评估。

结果

在 1957 例患者中,328 例为 BAV,1629 例为 TAV,年龄分别为 65±11 岁和 80±9 岁(p<0.001),男性分别占 65%和 56%(p=0.006)。BAV 形态与男性的 AVC 和 AVC 独立于年龄、合并症和 AS 严重程度有关(均 p<0.001)(性别与 BAV 相互作用 p<0.001)。在严重 AS 患者中,BAV 男性的平均 AVC 和 AVC 均高于 TAV 男性(均 p<0.001),但 BAV 女性和 TAV 女性之间相似(均 p≥0.4)。在调整临床协变量和 AS 严重程度后,仍存在相同的模式。BAV 男性严重 AS 诊断的最佳阈值为 AVC 为 2916AU 和 AVC 为 600AU/cm,高于指南推荐的阈值,而 BAV 女性的阈值(1036AU 和 282AU/cm)与指南推荐的相似。

结论

根据瓣膜形态和性别,AS 中的瓣膜钙化不同。严重 AS 的 BAV 男性比 TAV 男性具有更大的 AVC 和 AVC。这对当前指南提出了诊断挑战,需要在更大的研究中进行证实。

相似文献

1
Computed tomography calcium scoring in aortic stenosis: bicuspid versus tricuspid morphology.主动脉瓣狭窄的计算机断层钙评分:二叶瓣与三叶瓣形态。
Heart. 2024 Mar 22;110(8):594-602. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2023-323281.
2
Sex-Specific Differences in Aortic Valve Calcification Between Bicuspid and Tricuspid Severe Aortic Stenosis.二叶式和三叶式重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者主动脉瓣钙化的性别差异。
Am J Cardiol. 2023 Jun 15;197:87-92. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.03.024. Epub 2023 May 2.
3
Prognostic Implications of Bicuspid and Tricuspid Aortic Valve Phenotype on Progression of Moderate Aortic Stenosis and Ascending Aorta Dilatation.二叶式和三叶式主动脉瓣表型对中度主动脉瓣狭窄和升主动脉扩张进展的预后意义。
Am J Cardiol. 2021 Dec 15;161:76-83. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.08.050. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
4
Effect of age and aortic valve anatomy on calcification and haemodynamic severity of aortic stenosis.年龄和主动脉瓣解剖结构对主动脉瓣狭窄钙化及血流动力学严重程度的影响。
Heart. 2017 Jan 1;103(1):32-39. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-309665. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
5
Aortic Stenosis Progression, Cardiac Damage, and Survival: Comparison Between Bicuspid and Tricuspid Aortic Valves.主动脉瓣狭窄进展、心脏损伤和生存:二叶式和三叶式主动脉瓣的比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Jun;14(6):1113-1126. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2021.01.017. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
6
[Impact of bicuspid aortic valve or tricuspid aortic valve on hemodynamics and left ventricular reverse remodeling in patients after transcatheter aortic valve replacement].[二叶式主动脉瓣或三叶式主动脉瓣对经导管主动脉瓣置换术后患者血流动力学及左心室逆向重构的影响]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2022 Dec 24;50(12):1193-1200. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20221104-00865.
7
Indexed aortic valve area using multimodality imaging for assessing the severity of bicuspid aortic stenosis.采用多模态影像学对主动脉瓣面积进行索引评估,以评估二叶式主动脉瓣狭窄的严重程度。
Int J Cardiol. 2024 Nov 1;414:132416. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132416. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
8
Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Stenosis Demonstrate Adverse Left Ventricular Remodeling and Impaired Cardiac Function Before Surgery With Increased Risk of Postoperative Heart Failure.二叶式主动脉瓣狭窄患者在术前即存在左心室重构不良和心功能受损,术后心力衰竭风险增加。
Circulation. 2022 Oct 25;146(17):1310-1322. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.060125. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
9
Comparative study of bicuspid vs. tricuspid aortic valve stenosis.二叶式主动脉瓣与三叶式主动脉瓣狭窄的对比研究。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Jan 1;19(1):3-8. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jex211.
10
Computed Tomography Aortic Valve Calcium Scoring in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis.二叶式主动脉瓣狭窄患者的计算机断层扫描主动脉瓣钙化评分
Struct Heart. 2022 Apr 26;6(1):100027. doi: 10.1016/j.shj.2022.100027. eCollection 2022 Apr.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic and therapeutic implications of a low aortic valve calcium score in patients with low-gradient aortic stenosis.低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄患者主动脉瓣钙评分低的预后及治疗意义
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025 Jan 31;26(2):287-298. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeae276.
2
Aortic Valve Calcium Score: Applications in Clinical Practice and Scientific Research-A Narrative Review.主动脉瓣钙化评分:在临床实践与科研中的应用——一篇叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 11;13(14):4064. doi: 10.3390/jcm13144064.